Would you trade for Jimmy Graham?· Page 20

play2win
Senior Member

10 years ago

Actually, we were both wrong... I was much closer..

play2win Offline Posted: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 7:05:58 PM

I had no idea Dex! Cool!

I'm not down on Boykin at all. He could easily hold firm as our #3, or move up. I firmly believe this.

---So I apologize, at the time you converted p2w to thinking Boykin might beat out RC18 or Jordy it was TWO stats...the one I stated and FUMBLES.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

go fuck yourself asshole!!!!! Fucking smurf troll bitch!!!!

I suspected you wrre a troll bitch before Dakota even brought it up in the Rodgers dratf thread, laughed when he posted such, and have felt the same ever since. Really, you fucking prick, go fuck yourself. ASSHOLE!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#192

go fuck yourself asshole!!!!! Fucking smurf troll bitch!!!!

Originally Posted by: play2win

Let's not jump at eachothers throats.

Play2Win, I asked you a question in the editor thread. What gives with the no response dude!!!![grin1]

As for this topic, ... Jimmy Graham is NOT worth two first round picks.

play2win
Senior Member

10 years ago

#193

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

i suspect YOU are the troll Kevin, and that is SO FUCKING UNCOOL!

Adios!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

10 years ago

#194

i suspect YOU are the troll Kevin, and that is SO FUCKING UNCOOL!

Adios!

Originally Posted by: play2win

huh?

mi_keys
Senior Member

10 years ago

#195

For fun...go research the bio of SB winning HC, Brian Billick. You might be surprised to know where his road to SB HC started.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

Well if my lazy search of wikipedia is to be believed: High school football player that evidently holds the California state record for career interceptions. Played college ball. On NFL offseason rosters for a year. Grad assistent for a year. Two years in public relations for an NFL franchise and then coached for the next 27 years. Not sure what point you're making.

Born and bred a cheesehead

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#196

huh?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Did you tell him a post with a cuss word doesn't count in his 7 day total? 😆

Troll? Oh boy. I would bet I've followed the Packers for more years and more closely than you have.

This is my favorite franchise in all of professional sports. Just a special place with a special tradition.

I'm not sure why you flip out when what I do is bring up things you've posted. I'm sorry if I ridicule some of the things you say, but I do find much of what you say to be humorous and way out there. I'm sure it comes from a love for your team. It sounds terrible but we are very different types of Packers fan. I insist on objectivity...I can't do it the other way. I used to but there's no going back once you've crossed the line and if you ever do it, you'll understand. I wish I could be like you...I truly do. It was more fun that way. It's still fun, just not as much. I give you credit...you say some bizarre things, flip out, and come back and repeat the process over and over. I admire your stick-to-it-iveness. Curious to see if Dex is similar in that regard.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#197

Originally Posted by: mi_keys

So, where did the NFL portion of his career begin... As a PR guy for the Niners. The guy went from Niners PR guy to SB winning HC. If Brian Billick had done nothing but been a PR guy and offered his opinion you would invalidate it as he was ONLY a PR guy for an NFL team which wouldn't be good enough for the purpose of this debate.

Schefter spoke to Jimmy G.

Ed Werder spoke to Jimmy G.

Nate Davis USA Today spoke to Jimmy G.

Mike Florio PFT.com spoke to Jimmy G.

I'm a crazy idiot, they're just nobodies or somehow their opinion matters LESS than yours and you guys are right.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

mi_keys
Senior Member

10 years ago

#198

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

2 years in PR after first being a college player, NFL offseason member and grad assistant. He then goes back and spends almost the entirety of his career coaching.

I then came across this:
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/football/2007-07-30-1243447559_x.htm

So he was hired onto the PR payroll because there wasn't room on the coaching staff and the media following the team at the time thought he was a coach, evidently

Not at all comparable to the media folks you've quoted.

Born and bred a cheesehead

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#199

Originally Posted by: mi_keys

Of course he's not... because he didn't stay a PR guy. My contention was had he stayed a PR guy you would've paid no attention to him but inside that PR guy was a guy who would one day coach a SB winner.

One of my former bosses was very good at scouting NFL talent. He was being courted by Gary Horton to get into the game but he chose not to. If he was on this board, you would have no respect for his opinion if they ran counter to yours simply because they ran counter. You would not respect the fact that the guy was gifted with knowing certain things that others didn't know, including yourself, but you wouldn't even know that and would focus on the fact he didn't think like you blissfully unaware of how much more he actually knew than you.

I know it is not the Packer way to do biz like this. That isn't the topic, though. It is would YOU do this if you had the ability to do it? Given all the info that I'm privy to I would go for it and give Aaron all the weapons I could as his window is closing and perhaps we'll be plunged into a another 2.5 decade drought like before Brett and Aaron arrived. Playing conservative while you have a star QB is dumb.. you let him go to waste because he is good enough to elevate you way up there. I can see the argument that says and has said in this thread the same about the D. I think the D has been given all it needs. So many high picks and now Peppers even as old as he is. The point is this team should be made as strong as it can at ALL times all the much more while it has a guy at the helm who can win multiple SB's if given the team around him. Now, we're behind Seattle and Aaron's career may be over before we can overcome them. We're just now getting to the point where we're catching SF and now there's a Seattle. Would you like to just assume we're going to be able to take them this year, or will it take a few years of Niner-esque season ending losses to convince you we didn't do enough? I know you'd never do it, but think back on how we didn't go for it by getting guys like Jimmy Graham while we could've while Seattle wins multiples and Aaron's career ends with no more rings. You can feel good that we played safe and held on to some first round picks that may be the next Justin Harrell far more likely than they'll be the next Aaron Rodgers. History bears that one out with signficant force.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

10 years ago

#200

You know at this point I hope we trade for Graham just to see how many more twists and turns it'll produce in this thread.

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (1h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (1h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (1h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (5h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (5h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (7h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (7h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (7h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (7h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (7h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (7h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (7h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (7h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (8h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (9h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (9h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (9h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (9h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (10h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (10h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (10h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (11h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (11h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (11h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (12h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (13h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (13h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (13h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (14h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (14h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (14h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (14h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (14h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (14h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (14h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (14h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (14h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (14h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (14h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (14h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (14h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (14h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (14h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS