Owen Daniels paying Packers a visit

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

The Packers have a pair of free agent tight ends in Jermichael Finley and Andrew Quarless who have yet to sign contracts for next season, but the team isn't waiting for them to make up their minds to explore other options. Tom Silverstein of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that Owen Daniels is visiting with...

Josh Alper wrote:

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

texaspackerbacker
Veteran Member

10 years ago

Quarless is the solution. Ted better get him signed. Finley can go wherever. As for Daniels, he is still just 30. If he is not permanently damaged from his injury, and if he is cheap enough, he would be a good addition.

Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.

dhazer
Veteran Member

10 years ago

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker

They better sign him he is "Packer People" and by that I mean he has his injuries so he will fit in lol

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

porky88
Veteran Member

10 years ago

The biggest play of Quarless' career was a TD catch against Minnesota in 2010, which he actually dropped. Brad Childress just wasn't quick enough to challenge the play. He does have talent, but I wouldn’t put all my eggs into one basket.

Plus, it’d be nice to see the Packers get back to two tight end sets. A veteran plus an emerging Quarless (or draft pick) could open up that part of the playbook.

http://www.row12.com/

danreb
Registered

10 years ago

Daniels is a sure-handed tight end. Not the mismatch Finley is, but hey, it's a good signing if we make it happen.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

You all know how ted and Mike love their TE's!!!!
Have you all forgot about Brandon Bostic?

Then there is Jake Stoneburner.

Silly not to think these guys aren't going to get better their 2nd year.

Plenty of room for Owen Daniel if Quarless goes elsewhere. Even if Ted resigns Quarless it would be good to bring Daniels in.

Not even counting on Finley, no way The Packers let him come back after the injury.

Bostic, Stoneburner, Quarless, the ever present Ryan Taylor and Daniel wouldn't be a bad lineup at TE.

You've got Taylor, Bostic and Stoneburner contributing on Special teams while developeing another year with Quarless and Daniel as a pretty good pair of starting TE's.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

QCHuskerFan
Member

10 years ago

They better sign him he is "Packer People" and by that I mean he has his injuries so he will fit in lol

Originally Posted by: dhazer

You are on a roll this afternoon!😆

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

cheeseheads123
Member

10 years ago

Sure-handed and could definitely help the red zone offense.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

I want Quarless back, his blocking is very good and he has improved in receiving.

If we were going to bring in a FA at TE, I would look at Pettigrew.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Yerko
Senior Member

10 years ago

#10

I want Quarless back, his blocking is very good and he has improved in receiving.

If we were going to bring in a FA at TE, I would look at Pettigrew.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Pettigrew has a very bad history of dropping passes ever since his ankle injury, right?

I think Owen Daniels would be a good signing for the Packers. They have clearly expressed no interest in bringing back Finley (that's fine) and Owen Daniels is very sure-handed and is a red zone threat.

He'd be a good locker room presence and veteran presence for our young tight ends as well.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (1h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (2h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (8h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (9h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (16h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS