If I could applaud your last paragraph and leave out the crap above it, I would hahahaha, as you seem to be defending Capers.
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker
Not Capers... the scheme, which NFL coaches know can work and has worked. It's the traditional 3-4 scheme... which I think the Patriots used when they won 3 out of 4 straight Super Bowls. Personally I think Capers 3-4 system which is more high risk (and hopefully high reward) is better (just like you) which the Packers ran from 2009 to 2011 but got away from after the DL and DB got a lot worse in 2011 due to injuries, FA and declining vets and Packers need to go to something less aggressive.
I just think you don't understand how coaches can ask certain positions to be role players and do more of the dirty work to open up others t make plays. Almost every system someone has to do the dirty work unless you get something like a full time 4-2 cover or tampa 2 like the bears play under lovie smith.
Apparently, you missed the whole second half of my post about run stopping being better with mobile D-Linemen also - people with the capability actually tackle, not just take up space and not even do a good job of that.
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker
Nope I didn't... It's just clear your logic is all players equally being trying to be play makers is best which is your philosophy.
Sometimes that's true, sometimes it's not true. Players like Ryan Pickett, Brady Poppinga and many others have been best in role positions doing the dirty work to get other guys open to make the play.
I did not say or mean teams would automatically stop scheming to stop Matthews. What I said is that they would pay a price if they did that when we had a decent mobile D-Line that could actually provide its own pressure on the passer. With the fat turds we had in the line last season, opponents could do a lot more than chip Matthews with a TE, and the D-Line practically never made 'em pay a price for it.
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker
Well if you watch the game you would of saw on 3rd down when the pass rushers would come in and they would still double Matthews. So they whole, if you do this every thing is solved is just not correct. Teams chip the best pass rusher even with other pass rushers in there.
And what's up with the stupid name calling? Fat turds? Are we in middle school or something? If that profile pic is of you, you don't look like the skinniest guy out there.
And your other post - about Richardson? Come on! He is back up quality at best. The guy is no kind of a cover Safety.
Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker
Ummm I think you misread what I wrote or didn't understand something as you agreed with me about Richards not being the coverage S they seem to want.
What I said was (and said it's probably a horrible idea), but I wonder how Richardson would look if gained some weight and played as a coverage
ILB (not S but ILB). Again probably a horrible idea but just something I wondered about.
you just agreed with what I said about Richardson... yet you're saying "come on!" and using a disagreeing tone.
My post said Richardson can't be used like they want at S (cover Safety) that can rotate back and forth between SS and FS.
The thing I was wondering (and I said it's probably a horrible idea) I wonder if they asked him to gain weight and become a coverage ILB (not Safety like you wrot