People saying a TE but I really don't think it is that huge of a need. If we have Nelson, Cobb, Jones and Boykin, is a TE really that important? Quarless did a very good job at the end and he is a good blocker. I would worry more about the lines and safety. I see on walters football they have us taking Mosely at ILB.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 

The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

From the mocks I've seen he's not going to fall to 21. As far as the TE, WPR touched on this, but although I generally agree with your post and would personally prefer we go BPA defense, if some stud falls in our lap I wouldn't complain taking him. A.R. was an obvious example, to some extent Lacy was. Did N.E. need both Hernandez and Gronk? No, but man were they dangerous with both of those guys.

Originally Posted by: musccy 

Ha Ha ROFL LMAO Clinton Dix. Trade up Ted, do it.

8-[

Originally Posted by: VinceLambeauStarr 

I have wondered what will Ted do if say Clinton-Dix/Mosley/Nix (not all three, just one of them) etc slide a little. Would he trade up to say, 16 or 17?

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 

hmm, 4-5 spots - Iuno, I can't see it :-

Considering what we need and where, I am betting Ted will likely stick to his guns and pick in the 21st position every round.

Originally Posted by: VinceLambeauStarr