wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

People saying a TE but I really don't think it is that huge of a need. If we have Nelson, Cobb, Jones and Boykin, is a TE really that important? Quarless did a very good job at the end and he is a good blocker. I would worry more about the lines and safety. I see on walters football they have us taking Mosely at ILB.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



It depends on the TE. If they can land an All Pro TE then yeah they need him. If it is just a run of the mill average TE who doesn't do anything outstanding and can be replaced by 30 other guys then no they don't need him.
UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago

I don't think it's that different from any other position, really. TE just has lower positional value. Or used to have. Right now, I'd take a TE of Gronk's or Graham's caliber with the 21st pick in a heartbeat.

Not going BPA and drafting purely for need is what teams like the Jaguars tend to do. That nets you guys like Alualu at 10 overall and Gabbert in that same slot. The Lions did the same thing before they started drafting BPA. They've take a big step up from those days since they went with a guy like Farley, even though DT wasn't a need at that time.

The draft is just not something you should fill holes with like that. That's what FA is for. Even if we do barely use FA, that doesn't mean you want to go and then use the draft as a substitute.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Exactly. Ted must use FA or make a trade for a veteran top FS. Then, draft BPA. Problem is, will he make a move prior to the draft to insure S is covered?
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I do not know if it applies to safety, but Jason Wilde did say the Packers wouldn't take Matt Elam because of his height. One cornerback in nine drafts doesn't do much to debunk the rule. Plus, I believe Hayward was listed as 6-1 at Vanderbilt. Colleges do exaggerate height, but it's not as if he's as small as Lamarcus Joyner or Terrell Buckley. I’m sure Thompson (and Wolf) had exceptions over their tenure as GM, but I’m guessing it was rare. Regardless, it would surprise me if the Packers took Joyner or any cornerback that small.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
11 years ago

Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Jason Garrett owes 10% of his yearly earnings since becoming a coach in the NFL to Terrell Buckley.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
porky88
11 years ago

Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


I did check every one of Ted Thompson's drafts and I did not find a single cornerback under 5-11. It is the Terrell Buckley rule. I thought it applied to 6-0 and under, but Beast correctly pointed out that it is 5-10 and under. For what it's worth, I found no DB smaller than 5-10. Regardless, this rules out Florida State CB/S Lamarcus Joyner, who I find to be one of the most instinctive players in this draft.
cheeseheads123
11 years ago
Thats a shame because Joyner is one hell of a player
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

I don't think it's that different from any other position, really. TE just has lower positional value. Or used to have. Right now, I'd take a TE of Gronk's or Graham's caliber with the 21st pick in a heartbeat.

Not going BPA and drafting purely for need is what teams like the Jaguars tend to do. That nets you guys like Alualu at 10 overall and Gabbert in that same slot. The Lions did the same thing before they started drafting BPA. They've take a big step up from those days since they went with a guy like Farley, even though DT wasn't a need at that time.

The draft is just not something you should fill holes with like that. That's what FA is for. Even if we do barely use FA, that doesn't mean you want to go and then use the draft as a substitute.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



I agree with most of what you say. The problem is, TE is a position where it is hard to identify a future star. As I said, Gronk and Graham are examples of that. There probably are a lot of negative examples too.

You can modify drafting BPA by putting a few limits on it. For example, no chance we draft a QB or probably not a RB even if they are at the top of the board. All things considered, I would treat TE the same way. What we already have ain't great, but it is pretty decent, and drafting a TE #1 is far from a sure thing to be a star player. Plus, bottom line is the need for defensive playmakers.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
beast
11 years ago

Another very interesting guys that might be there is

DL Stephon Tuitt, Notre Dame, 6-6, 312

He's a prototypical 3-4 DE type than can sub in at NT from time to time but I don't think he can stay there. Though Packers haven't seem to want prototypical 3-4 DEs for what ever reason.

Prototypical 3-4 DE normally have longer limbs to battle with so they can play one gap and two gap better... because of the longer limbs they're usually 6'4" and up and they did grab Datone Jones 6'4" ... but Packers have seemed to prefer going the other way geting shorter guys, the idea of having short guys is they're closer to the ground and there for a better natural leverage point.


I understand having better natural leverage is important but so is keeping guys out of your pads... I question the Packers not grabing more taller DL to get that reach vaule which most 3-4 teams seem to perfer in their DEs.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I did check every one of Ted Thompson's drafts and I did not find a single cornerback under 5-11. It is the Terrell Buckley rule. I thought it applied to 6-0 and under, but Beast correctly pointed out that it is 5-10 and under. For what it's worth, I found no DB smaller than 5-10. Regardless, this rules out Florida State CB/S Lamarcus Joyner, who I find to be one of the most instinctive players in this draft.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.
UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago

The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yeah, the Mathieu pick was also fraught with character issues. I think that is what kept him out of GB, rather than size/stature. The kid can certainly play the game of football. I wish we had him. At least, I think I do… 😆
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (2h) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (2h) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (2h) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (2h) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (2h) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (2h) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (2h) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (2h) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (2h) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yeah, but this is taking a headline and slapping it into the Packers Talk
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Wasnt there a time guests could post in the help forum?
Zero2Cool (2h) : lol good question, kind of impressed!
Mucky Tundra (2h) : So how is a guest posting?
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Tell them its an emergency
Zero2Cool (2h) : Working. Meetings.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Lots of fun; the spam goes back 4 or 5 pages by this point
Mucky Tundra (2h) : I thought you'd look for yourself and put 2 and 2 together lol. I overestimated ya ;)
Mucky Tundra (2h) : I thought Guests couldnt post?
Zero2Cool (2h) : And gosh that's gonna be fun to clean up! hahaa
Zero2Cool (2h) : Oh. Why not just say that then? Geez.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : check the main forum, seems a spam bot is running amok
Zero2Cool (2h) : What?
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Is the Packers online game "Packers Predict" now available for 2024? I can't tell
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Bengals planning to Franchise Tag Tamaurice Higgins
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : Packers are hiring Luke Getsy as senior offensive assistant.
Martha Careful (12-Feb) : I would love to have them both, esp. Crosby, but either might be too expensive.
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : Keisean Nixon is trying to get Maxx Crosby and Davante Adams lol
Mucky Tundra (11-Feb) : Yeah where did it go?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : or did you resctrict access to that topic?
packerfanoutwest (11-Feb) : why did you remove the Playoff topic?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tua’s old DC won a Super Bowl Year 1 with Tua’s former backup
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : *winning MVP
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Funny observation I've heard: Carson Wentz was on the sideline for both Eagles Super Bowl wins w/guys supposed to be his back up winning
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : NFL thought it would get more attention week preceding Super Bowl.
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Yes, the Pro Bowl. It was played Sunday before Super Bowl from 2010-2022
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : pro bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : From 2010 to 2022, it was played on the Sunday before the Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : They moved it to the BYE week before Super Bowl several years ago.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : it was always after the SB.....
beast (10-Feb) : Though I stop following pro bowl years ago
beast (10-Feb) : I thought the pro game was before the Super Bowl?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Feb / Around The NFL / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

14-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-Feb / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

10-Feb / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

10-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.