wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
11 years ago

People saying a TE but I really don't think it is that huge of a need. If we have Nelson, Cobb, Jones and Boykin, is a TE really that important? Quarless did a very good job at the end and he is a good blocker. I would worry more about the lines and safety. I see on walters football they have us taking Mosely at ILB.

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



It depends on the TE. If they can land an All Pro TE then yeah they need him. If it is just a run of the mill average TE who doesn't do anything outstanding and can be replaced by 30 other guys then no they don't need him.
UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago

I don't think it's that different from any other position, really. TE just has lower positional value. Or used to have. Right now, I'd take a TE of Gronk's or Graham's caliber with the 21st pick in a heartbeat.

Not going BPA and drafting purely for need is what teams like the Jaguars tend to do. That nets you guys like Alualu at 10 overall and Gabbert in that same slot. The Lions did the same thing before they started drafting BPA. They've take a big step up from those days since they went with a guy like Farley, even though DT wasn't a need at that time.

The draft is just not something you should fill holes with like that. That's what FA is for. Even if we do barely use FA, that doesn't mean you want to go and then use the draft as a substitute.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Exactly. Ted must use FA or make a trade for a veteran top FS. Then, draft BPA. Problem is, will he make a move prior to the draft to insure S is covered?
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I do not know if it applies to safety, but Jason Wilde did say the Packers wouldn't take Matt Elam because of his height. One cornerback in nine drafts doesn't do much to debunk the rule. Plus, I believe Hayward was listed as 6-1 at Vanderbilt. Colleges do exaggerate height, but it's not as if he's as small as Lamarcus Joyner or Terrell Buckley. I’m sure Thompson (and Wolf) had exceptions over their tenure as GM, but I’m guessing it was rare. Regardless, it would surprise me if the Packers took Joyner or any cornerback that small.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
11 years ago

Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Jason Garrett owes 10% of his yearly earnings since becoming a coach in the NFL to Terrell Buckley.
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
porky88
11 years ago

Oh, so now it's cornerback, not defensive back? 🙄 I didn't check every draft, only a few random ones. (wink wink Rockmolder)


I called it the Terrell Buckley rule because he was a CORNER that was sub six feet AND from Florida State who basically was a massive flop for the Packers. Granted, he later went on to have a admirable career with teams like the Dolphins. I still remember the crowd erupting with cheers when he signaled fair catch AND caught the ball lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


I did check every one of Ted Thompson's drafts and I did not find a single cornerback under 5-11. It is the Terrell Buckley rule. I thought it applied to 6-0 and under, but Beast correctly pointed out that it is 5-10 and under. For what it's worth, I found no DB smaller than 5-10. Regardless, this rules out Florida State CB/S Lamarcus Joyner, who I find to be one of the most instinctive players in this draft.
cheeseheads123
11 years ago
Thats a shame because Joyner is one hell of a player
UserPostedImage
texaspackerbacker
11 years ago

I don't think it's that different from any other position, really. TE just has lower positional value. Or used to have. Right now, I'd take a TE of Gronk's or Graham's caliber with the 21st pick in a heartbeat.

Not going BPA and drafting purely for need is what teams like the Jaguars tend to do. That nets you guys like Alualu at 10 overall and Gabbert in that same slot. The Lions did the same thing before they started drafting BPA. They've take a big step up from those days since they went with a guy like Farley, even though DT wasn't a need at that time.

The draft is just not something you should fill holes with like that. That's what FA is for. Even if we do barely use FA, that doesn't mean you want to go and then use the draft as a substitute.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



I agree with most of what you say. The problem is, TE is a position where it is hard to identify a future star. As I said, Gronk and Graham are examples of that. There probably are a lot of negative examples too.

You can modify drafting BPA by putting a few limits on it. For example, no chance we draft a QB or probably not a RB even if they are at the top of the board. All things considered, I would treat TE the same way. What we already have ain't great, but it is pretty decent, and drafting a TE #1 is far from a sure thing to be a star player. Plus, bottom line is the need for defensive playmakers.


Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
beast
11 years ago

Another very interesting guys that might be there is

DL Stephon Tuitt, Notre Dame, 6-6, 312

He's a prototypical 3-4 DE type than can sub in at NT from time to time but I don't think he can stay there. Though Packers haven't seem to want prototypical 3-4 DEs for what ever reason.

Prototypical 3-4 DE normally have longer limbs to battle with so they can play one gap and two gap better... because of the longer limbs they're usually 6'4" and up and they did grab Datone Jones 6'4" ... but Packers have seemed to prefer going the other way geting shorter guys, the idea of having short guys is they're closer to the ground and there for a better natural leverage point.


I understand having better natural leverage is important but so is keeping guys out of your pads... I question the Packers not grabing more taller DL to get that reach vaule which most 3-4 teams seem to perfer in their DEs.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
11 years ago

I did check every one of Ted Thompson's drafts and I did not find a single cornerback under 5-11. It is the Terrell Buckley rule. I thought it applied to 6-0 and under, but Beast correctly pointed out that it is 5-10 and under. For what it's worth, I found no DB smaller than 5-10. Regardless, this rules out Florida State CB/S Lamarcus Joyner, who I find to be one of the most instinctive players in this draft.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.
UserPostedImage
play2win
11 years ago

The only way to correctly point it out is to source the rule directly to Ted Thompson's words. I have yet to see that. Otherwise we can surmise there is a rule to not draft Wisconsin players since Ted Thompson as Packers GM (not sure about Seattle time as draft guru). Or about a hundred other "rules".


I liked that Tyrann Mathieu (sp) coming out of college, but figured he was too short especially after Charles Woodson said something about the Packers needed to get bigger and faster and someone on the staff agreed with him.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yeah, the Mathieu pick was also fraught with character issues. I think that is what kept him out of GB, rather than size/stature. The kid can certainly play the game of football. I wish we had him. At least, I think I do… 😆
Fan Shout
beast (42m) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (43m) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (44m) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (4h) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (5h) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (5h) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (7h) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (7h) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (7h) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (9h) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (11h) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (18h) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Game not over yet
beast (19h) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (19h) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (19h) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21h) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21h) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21h) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21h) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Ravens still alive, but barely
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Time to make dinner
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : DAGGER
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : pass plays
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Do or die time for the Rams
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking field goals are impressive
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oh that might be a backbreaker
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking doesn't make much sense
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.