minnypacker
16 years ago
Defensively, do we need to consider redoing our LB corp?

Barnett is a solid player, but a bit light for runstuffing. How will he recover from his knee injury?

Hawk is an enigma. In theory he should be a solid LB. In theory a top 5 pick would be an impact guy...haven't seen it yet. He seems too small and appears to have a difficult time disengaging from blockers. Is he a "bust" for a top 5 pick? Would a different system fit him better?

Poppinga is a high energy guy with limitations. However, I'd almost rather watch him play than Hawk at this point. He is a converted rusg end who has the potential to be a stud in a 3-4 system. Unfortunately we run a 4-3.

Chillar is a solid guy who runs well but lacks the pop for run support.

Bishop makes plays, unfortunately he also gives them up. In a perfect world he probably is a MLB in a 4-3 or a ILB in a 3-4. Just not a complete package at this point.

Do we need to consider adding a FA LB or draft one? There are some solid players in the FA market at teh LB position, do we need to consider signing one? Do we need to consider drafting a guy like Curry?

Without a doubt this group needs to play better next season. An improved DL and different scheme might allow us to make a go of it with the pieces in place...we shall see.
Greg C.
16 years ago
I was baffled by the poor play of the linebackers this year. I have no idea what needs to be done. Hawk is not small, by the way, he has at least average size for an LB. But he sure was awful this season. Barnett didn't play well either. Poppinga is good at the line of scrimmage but a liability behind it. Chillar is decent in pass coverage but weak against the run. Maybe it's time to at least have an open competition between Hawk and Bishop for the WLB spot, or the MLB spot.
blank
porky88
16 years ago

Defensively, do we need to consider redoing our LB corp?

Barnett is a solid player, but a bit light for runstuffing. How will he recover from his knee injury?

Hawk is an enigma. In theory he should be a solid LB. In theory a top 5 pick would be an impact guy...haven't seen it yet. He seems too small and appears to have a difficult time disengaging from blockers. Is he a "bust" for a top 5 pick? Would a different system fit him better?

Poppinga is a high energy guy with limitations. However, I'd almost rather watch him play than Hawk at this point. He is a converted rusg end who has the potential to be a stud in a 3-4 system. Unfortunately we run a 4-3.

Chillar is a solid guy who runs well but lacks the pop for run support.

Bishop makes plays, unfortunately he also gives them up. In a perfect world he probably is a MLB in a 4-3 or a ILB in a 3-4. Just not a complete package at this point.

Do we need to consider adding a FA LB or draft one? There are some solid players in the FA market at teh LB position, do we need to consider signing one? Do we need to consider drafting a guy like Curry?

Without a doubt this group needs to play better next season. An improved DL and different scheme might allow us to make a go of it with the pieces in place...we shall see.

"minnypacker" wrote:



I think the Packers have good players at this group so I don't think a shakeup is needed where the Packers go out and sign Ray Lewis or draft someone No. 9.

I really don't think Brady Poppinga would be a stud in a 3-4. In fact I think he'd be an average player at best. He just doesn't have the pass rushing skills to play that system. He is what he is and that's an average starter.

That's why I think you obviously stick with the 4-3 and put your players in their best positions.

A.J. Hawk is a decent weakside backer. Is he a bust? Hard to say. He was solid for his first two years, but arguably below average this year. Nick Collins went through the same thing and in his fourth year (this season) he was outstanding. I expect similar results out of Hawk, but he needs to be on the weakside in my opinion.

Nick Barnett is strong in coverage and it's time to utilize that. Move him to the strong side backer, but play him in dime and nickel positions still. He wouldn't have to unlearn anything. He knows the Packers dime and nickel defense. He could easily do all that. He's been paid so he doesn't have to worry about racking up stats to get a big contract anymore.

The last starter should be Desmond Bishop in the middle. He's proven to be stout against the run. He's the best tackler out of the three or at least has shown that and he fills the gaps much quicker. His instincts have gotten better which is rare for a young player. You could argue that he could be put on either the strong or weak side as well with Barnett in the middle or Hawk at strong side. Either way, Bishop is a starting caliber player and he's proved it in my opinion over the course of the past two seasons. He needs to be on the field.

You put those three on the field and with an improve line, GB would have three linebackers who could absolutely fly around and flock to the ball which they didn't do this year.

Poppinga can be given a tryout as a pass rusher via linebacker and defensive end. GB can move him around and use him in situations.

That's what I would do.
go.pack.go.
16 years ago
Maybe bring in a guy like Vilma, if Ted Thompson really wanted to, but he doesn't need to. Like Porky said, we should have Hawk, Bishop, and Barnett starting. Brady Pop could be our blitzing linebacker, or situational linebacker.

To answer your question, no, we don't need to redo our linebacking core.
UserPostedImage
wils0646
16 years ago
I'm not sure if anything really needs to be done. It was odd that all of LBs really had down years compared to last year...but it could just be one very important reason why. Having a solid d-line can make your LB crew instantly better and we had one of the poorest in the league. Last year, we had the depth and talent (+ no major injury) for all of those guys to thrive.

The d-line had more to do with the whole LB crew being in decline. I don't see any other reason.

Barnett (before injury) and Hawk were both having terrible years. If the d-line isn't blocking and clogging incoming offensive linemen, LBs can't succeed, period.
The Pack Will Be Back.
Bigbyfan
16 years ago
I know this is probably already listed somewhere but who are the interesting free agent LB's in the league this year?
blank
go.pack.go.
16 years ago

I know this is probably already listed somewhere but who are the interesting free agent LB's in the league this year?

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



I know of two...Jonathan Vilma and Ray Lewis.
UserPostedImage
Bigbyfan
16 years ago

I know this is probably already listed somewhere but who are the interesting free agent LB's in the league this year?

"go.pack.go." wrote:



I know of two...Jonathan Vilma and Ray Lewis.

"Bigbyfan" wrote:



Oh that reminds me that Bart Scott and Terrell Suggs are free agents... Baltimore will only be able to sign two of the three so someone is getting to test the open market.
blank
RainX
16 years ago
Their play was disappointing this year overall, but with the amount of money invested in the group to this point, it's really to early to give up on it. They played pretty well in 2007 when there was a better front 4 in front of them.

I'd say give them one more year (hopefully behind a better line) and see if things don't improve. If they struggle again in '09, then it's probably time to start looking in a different direction.
blank
djcubez
16 years ago
I like the idea of moving Barnett outside, leaving Hawk outside and then giving Bishop a chance in the middle. All in all, Desmond had a couple bad plays in pass coverage but I've never seen any of our other backers play so well against the run--he was in the backfield all the time. With Barnett and Hawk playing more coverage it might free up Bishop a little bit.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (51m) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (52m) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (2h) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (3h) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19h / Fantasy Sports Talk / GoPack1984

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

11-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

11-Aug / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

11-Aug / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.