In his six-year head coaching career with the Packers from 2000–05, Sherman compiled a 57–39 regular season record and a 2–4 postseason record. And he got fired after 1 losing season despite losing 3 pro bowlers early in the year.


So he got fired after 1 losing season and this will be MM's 2nd so why is he still here?

Originally Posted by: dhazer 

In his six-year head coaching career with the Packers from 2000–05, Sherman compiled a 57–39 regular season record and a 2–4 postseason record. And he got fired after 1 losing season despite losing 3 pro bowlers early in the year.


So he got fired after 1 losing season and this will be MM's 2nd so why is he still here?

Originally Posted by: dhazer 

[roflmao] [roflmao] [roflmao]

See Texas, I'm not the only one that thinks you're a Dumbass! But you keep up your opinions. Boomers know everything after all.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

hahaha whatever you say, but you basically agreed with me in the post above this one - the reason I applauded you.

I see slowly, a few people are coming around to the obvious point of view - that the reason for the sorry-assed O Line and much of the D is our great "talent evaluator" - that's a laugh!

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

In his six-year head coaching career with the Packers from 2000–05, Sherman compiled a 57–39 regular season record and a 2–4 postseason record. And he got fired after 1 losing season despite losing 3 pro bowlers early in the year.


So he got fired after 1 losing season and this will be MM's 2nd so why is he still here?

Originally Posted by: dhazer 

Aren't half the teams in the league looking for a starting quarterback? What's unacceptable is the O-line we keep trotting out there to block for our QB. Time to buy a few in free agency, wouldn't you think?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

They have gave them time, not their fault a Quarterback not named Aaron Rodgers can't win us a game. When Aaron was QB their sacks were down significantly from last year through 8 weeks. Not surprised their play declined when he went down, hell the whole team declined when he went down. Then we got even more rash of injurys. Went downhill from there.

When you go through about 4 quarterbacks in a matter of 5 weeks something's wrong. That's the only thing I would put on Ted. He didn't prepare for this.

Originally Posted by: Gaycandybacon 

For how long must we not complain about Ted Thompson because of the Super Bowl?

Originally Posted by: K_Buz 

Your point?

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

If I remember correctly, the cupboards were bare under Sherman coach/GM. We were in salary cap hell and very few young and talented players to replace aging veterans. Sherman ran the Packers as if they were one player away from the Super Bowl every year and never thinking about the future.

What I'd like to see Ted Thompson do is shore up weaknesses with 2nd tier free agents instead of relying on rookies. Very few rookies are impact players.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT