Jarrett Boykin has the 11th most WR yards in the league since he started getting significant snaps in week 6.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

This says a lot. He was thrown into unknown territory, and has responded well - very well. I knew he could play, but I didn't expect this much production.

Originally Posted by: hardrocker950 

With back up/3rd string/4th string QBs throwing to him too.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

When Healthy I wouldn't put ANY ONE TEAMs wr corpse , over Nelson, Cobb, Jones, and now Boykin(hecactch).

Without Cobb, I'll drop them to 3 or 4.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 

I wouldn't put a corpse over our guys even when they are hurt.[grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1] [grin1]

Sorry, I couldn't resist. I know what you mean though and with the apparent emergence of Boykin it gives us some leeway with Jones. A 3 deep squad is nice but 4 is something few teams can even hope to have. It may be luxury we can't afford however.

Originally Posted by: sschind 

Lions, Cowboys, Bears, Bengals, maybe Saints, Cardinals, Texans, Niners, Ravens, Eagles

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

I hope we can. Jones has overcome his inconsistencies the last few seasons and he goes about his business the right way, as does the whole group. At a position dominated by divas and pricks, it's nice to have a group that across the board we can rely on and that is happy to contribute any way they can, whether that means they are blocking down field all game or reeling in 10 catches for 100+ and a few scores. I'd like to be able to keep them together, especially with what seems to be the likely end of Finley's career.

Originally Posted by: mi_keys 

I still see Jones as inconsistent. He has some fantastic games mixed with games where he just disappears. It's early but I think Boykin is a much better WR than Jones.

Originally Posted by: luigis 

The Niners are the 32nd passing offense. I don't care how many injuries. They have had a starting QB throwing the ball for 11 games. No way are they in the top 10. Certainly not ahead of the Packers.

Houston has 2 WR in the top 100 based on receptions. Hard to lobby for a top 10 rating with that poor level of production.

Bears have 2 WR in the Top 80.

Packers have 4 in the Top 68.

Packers have the #5 pass offense. It's not because of all the receptions our TE and RB are making. To not list them in anyone's top 5 is ridiculous.

Originally Posted by: QCHuskerFan