Will Aaron Rodgers make 4000 yards this season?· Page 3

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

16 years ago

#21

Its how you can manipulate stats to change views about a qb.

"dhazer" wrote:

We are FULLY aware of your sole purpose of posting stats. Weak.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#22

Yes, he will get it. Only if allowed by McCarthy, though.

If he gets somewhere around 25-30 passes then he will have it.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#23

As long as Rodgers isn't pulled for any reason, he should get to 4000. I would like to see it, but I am also happy with his play even if he was kept out of the final game. Rodgers had a very good year, and the future looks bright for him.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

zombieslayer
Registered

16 years ago

#24

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

Agreed.

I'm very proud of Rodgers. :thumbright:

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

dhazer
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#25

Its how you can manipulate stats to change views about a qb.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

We are FULLY aware of your sole purpose of posting stats. Weak.

"dhazer" wrote:

I was just showing that if they all had the same attempts that 4000 yards wouldn't be that big of a deal.

But i wonder if Mike McCarthy will let him get to 4000, i heard the saints say there main goal is to get Brees the record they want that more than a win.

I remember back when 1000 yards was a big deal now its about average for the league, I also remember when 3000 was a big deal. How times have changed.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

16 years ago

#26

Its how you can manipulate stats to change views about a qb.

"dhazer" wrote:

We are FULLY aware of your sole purpose of posting stats. Weak.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"dhazer" wrote:

Just like a RB who runs with a 5.5 yard average never EVER drops below that with more attempts.

Yes, gotcha. Right on!! Right back to this ...

Its how you can manipulate stats to change views about a qb.

"dhazer" wrote:

dhazer
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#27

Its how you can manipulate stats to change views about a qb.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

We are FULLY aware of your sole purpose of posting stats. Weak.

"dhazer" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Just like a RB who runs with a 5.5 yard average never EVER drops below that with more attempts.

Yes, gotcha. Right on!! Right back to this ...

Its how you can manipulate stats to change views about a qb.

"dhazer" wrote:

Wow i don't know what i did to piss you off so much. Way it looks there will be 8 qbs over 4000 yards. and as many as 20 qbs at 3000 yards passing. Brees is going to go over 5000 yards.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

porky88
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#28

It's one thing to throw for 4,000 yards and have a completion percentage of under 60% and a ton of picks, but to throw for 4,000 yards with an exceptional completion percentage and an exceptional TD to INT ratio is unbelievable for a first year starting QB.

http://www.row12.com/

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

16 years ago

#29

Wow i don't know what i did to piss you off so much. Way it looks there will be 8 qbs over 4000 yards. and as many as 20 qbs at 3000 yards passing. Brees is going to go over 5000 yards.

"dhazer" wrote:

Ignorance. Stubbornness. Bullheaded. Pighead. Shitheaded.

You name it bubba, you've earned it with PRIDE.

I love your passion, but stop being a dipshit. Try to be reasonable with your stats and what you claim are 'facts'.

You piss me off because I know you are better than this and you keep stooping to this dipshit level similar to p@ck66.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

16 years ago

#30

I won't blame Mike McCarthy though because that's probably what I would do too if we jump out to a 14-3 lead in the 1st half.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

For the love of God, WHY? As we have seen numerous times this season -- not just in our own games, but in games throughout the league -- 14-3 is NOT a commanding league. It's a two-possession deficit, from which it's not too terribly difficult to come back.

I can see sitting on your heels and running if you're up 28-0, maybe, but 14-3 while the game is still in doubt? Hardly.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (7h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (12h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (20h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS