porky88
16 years ago
It's a what if scenario obviously and I kind of think Holmgrem will stay west or end up in Dallas, but I cannot believe what I'm reading.

Mike Holmgrem left Green Bay for a promotion in Seattle and more money. People still haven't gotten over that evidently.

I would bring in Mike Holmgrem in a heartbeat. All he did was help take the laughing stock known as the Green Bay Packers and turn them into one of the most successful teams of the 90's.

All he did was take a Seattle Seahawks team that was a laughing stock and help turn them into a playoff team for just about every single season. He also took them to a Super Bowl where they were beaten in large part due to being on the bad side of some bad officiating.

Mike Holmgrem is a Hall of Fame coach. He's one of only two coaches in the history of the NFL to take two different teams to the Super Bowl. The other is Bill Parcells.

It's funny that last night I was up late and watching an old game. It was the Monday Night game against the 49ers where the Packers came back and won on an OT field goal by Chris Jackie. The Packers were bigger, faster, stronger, and better coached back then.

Do I like Mike McCarthy?

He's an ok coach.

He's not a Hall of Fame coach.

Mike Holmgrem is.

Mike Sherman took a fall for a 4-12 year. McCarthy taking a fall for a 5-11 year wouldn't be that bizarre.

Now again this is a what if situation and this inst' going to happen, but I cant say I'd feel sad if it did.
Orygunfan76
16 years ago

Nope....i don't want him back.
He's the reason we lost SB 32.

"Cheesey" wrote:



No, John Elway is.
blank
Fred
16 years ago

It's a what if scenario obviously and I kind of think Holmgrem will stay west or end up in Dallas, but I cannot believe what I'm reading.

Mike Holmgrem left Green Bay for a promotion in Seattle and more money. People still haven't gotten over that evidently.

I would bring in Mike Holmgrem in a heartbeat. All he did was help take the laughing stock known as the Green Bay Packers and turn them into one of the most successful teams of the 90's.

All he did was take a Seattle Seahawks team that was a laughing stock and help turn them into a playoff team for just about every single season. He also took them to a Super Bowl where they were beaten in large part due to being on the bad side of some bad officiating.

Mike Holmgrem is a Hall of Fame coach. He's one of only two coaches in the history of the NFL to take two different teams to the Super Bowl. The other is Bill Parcells.

It's funny that last night I was up late and watching an old game. It was the Monday Night game against the 49ers where the Packers came back and won on an OT field goal by Chris Jackie. The Packers were bigger, faster, stronger, and better coached back then.

Do I like Mike McCarthy?

He's an ok coach.

He's not a Hall of Fame coach.

Mike Holmgrem is.

Mike Sherman took a fall for a 4-12 year. McCarthy taking a fall for a 5-11 year wouldn't be that bizarre.

Now again this is a what if situation and this inst' going to happen, but I cant say I'd feel sad if it did.

"porky88" wrote:



Agree 100% :thumbleft:
+1
blank
dingus
16 years ago

Nope....i don't want him back.
He's the reason we lost SB 32.

"Orygunfan76" wrote:



No, John Elway is.

"Cheesey" wrote:



No, Terrell Davis is
blank
16 years ago
The only play I remember from that Superbowl is the pass skipping short of Chmura on 4th down. It replayed in my head over and over for about 6 months.
CDNRodgersfan
16 years ago
The whole coaching carousal in the NFL is a joke. Basically you got one year to to have a winning year and even after that one bad year and you're garbage. How in the heck is a coach ever suppose to get anywhere putting a franchise together. I a huge fan of routine and I love what I see with the Broncos, Steelers and Titans in the way they treat coaching staff. Maybe this is why those are three of the more stable franchises. I just feel if you're gonna fire a coach after every losing season you better nevr hire one to more then a one year deal
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I don't want Holmgren back. I'm happy for the opportunity he had and I understand for the most part why he jumped at it. But I can't shake the feeling that he abandoned us and the team.
vegOmatic
16 years ago
I think if all the Favre Lovers would get over last summer and shut up we would have a lot more interesting posts in the Packer forums.
blank
Stevetarded
16 years ago

I think if all the Favre Lovers would get over last summer and shut up we would have a lot more interesting posts in the Packer forums.

"vegOmatic" wrote:



maybe they will all retire next year.
blank
IronMan
16 years ago

It's a what if scenario obviously and I kind of think Holmgrem will stay west or end up in Dallas, but I cannot believe what I'm reading.

Mike Holmgrem left Green Bay for a promotion in Seattle and more money. People still haven't gotten over that evidently.

I would bring in Mike Holmgrem in a heartbeat. All he did was help take the laughing stock known as the Green Bay Packers and turn them into one of the most successful teams of the 90's.

All he did was take a Seattle Seahawks team that was a laughing stock and help turn them into a playoff team for just about every single season. He also took them to a Super Bowl where they were beaten in large part due to being on the bad side of some bad officiating.

Mike Holmgrem is a Hall of Fame coach. He's one of only two coaches in the history of the NFL to take two different teams to the Super Bowl. The other is Bill Parcells.

It's funny that last night I was up late and watching an old game. It was the Monday Night game against the 49ers where the Packers came back and won on an OT field goal by Chris Jackie. The Packers were bigger, faster, stronger, and better coached back then.

Do I like Mike McCarthy?

He's an ok coach.

He's not a Hall of Fame coach.

Mike Holmgrem is.

Mike Sherman took a fall for a 4-12 year. McCarthy taking a fall for a 5-11 year wouldn't be that bizarre.

Now again this is a what if situation and this inst' going to happen, but I cant say I'd feel sad if it did.

"porky88" wrote:

Once again the voice of reason.
Fan Shout
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.