Packers can pick up ONLY ONE of the two options. Which do you choose?


Steven Jackson 3 years for $2.2 million average per year contract.

Greg Jennings 3 years for $6.7 million average per year contract.

---

Greg Jennings has postured his way off the team already, and he did a good job of that. We all know he wants to break the bank, and I don't begrudge him for that. However, he has forced us to look at what the team would be like without him in that process.

Steven Jackson is hungry for the ring, and may carry a greater impact on the team's overall success.

I like the lower price tag.
We have other players @ WR that are capable. Not so @ RB.
Just a better value for Jackson and I am not completely sold on him but I still have to give him the vote.

---

Offense is good enough to win without Jennings. A RB upgrade and a defensive upgrade will improve the team.

---

I'm filled with self-loathing choosing Jackson over Jennings, but I think he would make a bigger difference. At the amounts you estimate, we certainly ought to be able to afford both - without upsetting the process of retaining Rodgers and Matthews.

---

Well Steven jackson just signed with Atlanta, so this topic is mute!!!!

---

Where did you go to college, Ohio State?



Mute: unable to speak

Moot: of little or no practical value or meaning

---

😆 😆

No I meant mute, don't need to talk about it anymore!!!!

---

well played, even though we all know you screwed up the first time😄

For me it was a tough decision. I like the upgrade at RB that I think Jackson would give and I like the lower salary but I still went with Jennings. The wild card being Finley. If we resign Jennings I think we can let Finley walk and our passing game will not suffer. If we keep Finley the loss of Jennings would not be so bad. If we lose Jennings and Finley I don't care what anybody says our passing game gets much weaker. I also think keeping Jennings will help us more than keeping Finley.

What to do at RB? I can't honestly say. If those numbers given are anything close to accurate (I saw 3 years 12 mil 4 guaranteed on one site) I say we could have done both and called it a successful FA period.