hosemeoff
16 years ago
This is an interesting discussion. I do wonder what metrics are used to determine luckiness. For example, Green Bay has 6 Touchdowns on D (most in the league) and the league average is 1.4. These 4 and half TDs above the average equals about 32 points. GB is also barely ahead of the curve in ST TDs, so there's a couple more points in our favor, which could also explain our perceived unluckiness in scoring differential above.

The point is, in games like baseball that truly only require 1 player at any moment in time to execute perfectly it is probably easier to apply a statistical model to predict success. In football there are 11 players at any moment in time that must execute, which makes the statistics much fuzzier. They don't record failures to execute (errors) in football (at least not on the scoreboard for all to see).

I've always liked the saying "luck is when preparation meets opportunity," and unfortunately I think our offseason preparation has yielded the unluckiness we are experiencing in our opportunities. Does anyone still believe that Corey Williams wasn't worth a little more money (please no snide comments about his perceived lesser production in Cleveland since he only has .5 sacks in a vastly different D scheme - he was an outstanding player in GBs scheme)?
blank
IronMan
16 years ago




I've always liked the saying "luck is when preparation meets opportunity,"

"hosemeoff" wrote:


I like that. +1
16 years ago

This is an interesting discussion. I do wonder what metrics are used to determine luckiness. For example, Green Bay has 6 Touchdowns on D (most in the league) and the league average is 1.4. These 4 and half TDs above the average equals about 32 points. GB is also barely ahead of the curve in ST TDs, so there's a couple more points in our favor, which could also explain our perceived unluckiness in scoring differential above.

"hosemeoff" wrote:



I see what you're trying to say, but I think it's irrelevant, unless defensive points didn't matter towards determining which team won or lost a game.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
16 years ago

This is an interesting discussion. I do wonder what metrics are used to determine luckiness. For example, Green Bay has 6 Touchdowns on D (most in the league) and the league average is 1.4. These 4 and half TDs above the average equals about 32 points. GB is also barely ahead of the curve in ST TDs, so there's a couple more points in our favor, which could also explain our perceived unluckiness in scoring differential above.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I see what you're trying to say, but I think it's irrelevant, unless defensive points didn't matter towards determining which team won or lost a game.

"hosemeoff" wrote:



I think someplace in there you have to factor margin of victory into this "luck" equation.. take the Bears game in which we win by hmmm 35 coupled with a 23 point victory over the pathetic Lions and normalize the margin.. because that this is an anomaly all by itself..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
I think the Lions win and Saints loss can cancel each other out, but the Bears win is a pesky one.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
16 years ago

This is an interesting discussion. I do wonder what metrics are used to determine luckiness. For example, Green Bay has 6 Touchdowns on D (most in the league) and the league average is 1.4. These 4 and half TDs above the average equals about 32 points. GB is also barely ahead of the curve in ST TDs, so there's a couple more points in our favor, which could also explain our perceived unluckiness in scoring differential above.

"pack93z" wrote:



I see what you're trying to say, but I think it's irrelevant, unless defensive points didn't matter towards determining which team won or lost a game.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I think someplace in there you have to factor margin of victory into this "luck" equation.. take the Bears game in which we win by hmmm 35 coupled with a 23 point victory over the pathetic Lions and normalize the margin.. because that this is an anomaly all by itself..

"hosemeoff" wrote:



REALLY hard to determine, but you make a good point about why this statistic is at the very least troublesome. There are also games where we may have had a big lead and loosened up on defense, allowing some points. Or games where our offense went into a different mode based on the score, scoring less.
UserPostedImage
HoustonMatt
16 years ago

This is an interesting discussion. I do wonder what metrics are used to determine luckiness. For example, Green Bay has 6 Touchdowns on D (most in the league) and the league average is 1.4. These 4 and half TDs above the average equals about 32 points. GB is also barely ahead of the curve in ST TDs, so there's a couple more points in our favor, which could also explain our perceived unluckiness in scoring differential above.

"pack93z" wrote:



I see what you're trying to say, but I think it's irrelevant, unless defensive points didn't matter towards determining which team won or lost a game.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I think someplace in there you have to factor margin of victory into this "luck" equation.. take the Bears game in which we win by hmmm 35 coupled with a 23 point victory over the pathetic Lions and normalize the margin.. because that this is an anomaly all by itself..

"hosemeoff" wrote:



I tend to agree with this statement and it's one of the reason why Pythagorean Records works so well in baseball, but has yet to be applied to football. Simply put - sample size. Pythagorean Record is based on the premise that run distribution should even out around the mean over the course of the season. Sound premise in a 162 games season where on 22-3 victory is blip on the total radar. However, a large margin of victory or loss over the course of a 16 game season holds a lot more weight.

BUT, not necessarily in the Packers case. You could just as easily use the Saints loss to "cancel out" the Bears win and still get a fairly normal distribution. That's kind of pointless though as I'm not suggesting we use the data I originally posted as an end all be all statistic. It simply points to a larger trend that many people on this board and around football have noticed - that the Packers ARE a better team than their record would show and that all other things being equal, the Packers should have a much improved record next year.

As for dhazer's question about whether or not this meant the Packers were lucky last year.....yes, it does. The article states that using the same formula for last year's numbers showed the Packers as being the luckiest team in football.

It's also great to see some other statistically-inclined board members here. I forget who posted the chart, but thanks for running that regression model.
blank
HoustonMatt
16 years ago

Tennessee: +147 (12-2)
NY Giants: +128 (11-3)
Baltimore: +112 (9-5)
Pittsburgh: +110 (11-3)
Philadelphia: +96 (8-5-1)
Carolina: +89 (11-3)
NY Jets: +66 (9-5)
Tampa Bay: +62 (9-5)
Atlanta: +55 (9-5)
Minnesota: +52 (9-5)
Indianapolis: +49 (10-4)
New England: +48 (9-5)
San Diego: +44 (6-8)
Dallas: +44 (9-5)
New Orleans Saints: +39 (7-7)
Green Bay: +32 (5-9)
Chicago: +29 (8-6)
Arizona: +28 (8-6)
Miami: +14 (9-5)
Buffalo: 0 (6-8)
Houston: -24 (7-7)
Washington: -35 (7-7)
Jacksonville: -38 (5-9)
Denver: -40 (8-6)
San Francisco: -46 (5-9)
Cleveland: -73 (4-10)
Seattle: -95 (3-11)
Kansas City: -132 (2-12)
Oakland: -143 (3-11)
Cincinnati: -184 (2-11)
Detroit: -204 (0-14)
St. Louis: -228 (2-12)

If net points mean anything, GB and San Diego are the two unlucky teams, and Denver is the lucky team.

I wouldn't feel wrong saying that San Diego should have a better record than they do this year, either.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



This is just a fantastic chart. Of the teams with positive point differentials, only 2 have losing records. Of the teams with negative point differentials, only one has a winning record. If you'd like to ignore point differentials, do so at your own peril. But the evidence exists that win-loss record and point differential have about as strong of a correlation as one could find.

Looking at this, you have to ask two questions: Why do San Diego and Green Bay have such poor records and why does Denver have a good record? Those are the only three anomalies. The Denver/San Diego question can partially be answered by Ed Hochuli. Without that clearly blown call gifting Denver a win, those two teams sit at 7-7.

So what about Green Bay?

I think the crux of the debate lies in the usage of the word "luck". It has a certain negative connotation to some people and I think it gets misconstrued a bit.

Luck, in this sense, isn't the same as luck in the sense of flipping a coin or pulling an inside straight. Those are event which are purely random an of which an individual has zero control.

Luck in the sense that we're using the term is a little different. It's tough to explain, so if anyone else can do it better than I, please do so. I'll try to do it with a few recent examples.

1. The Steve Smith catch
2. The Edwards fumble returned by the Jets for a TD
3. The Eagles ST fumble last year against us that gave us the go ahead score
4. Sage Rosenfels' meltdown against the Colts in the final 5 minutes
5. Mario Williams' sack on third down to knock us out of FG range

None of these events were purely random or individually strange. You'd expect all of them to happen in one form or another over the course of the season. What's significant is not that these things happen, but in what scenario they occur and how many times you're on the losing end. Even though Steve Smith is expected to make that catch from time to time, more often than not, he won't. The fact that he made it against us and with very little time remaining in the game could be considered a bit "unlucky." Mario Williams should be expected to get about one sack vs Rodgers, but he can't control when he gets that sack any more than our line can control when we give it up. If that were the case, then we would obviously try to give up our Mario Williams sack very early in the game, while he would try to save it for the most crucial point (even though he can't possibly know that until after the fact) of every game. So you could say that we got a bit "unlucky" that his sack occurred on the down it did, where on the field it did, and at what point of the game it did.

Basically, in all sports (and life) positive and negative things happen and you can't really control when they occur. You just hope they the bad comes at the most preferable time. Sometimes all the bad comes at reasonably acceptable times. Sometimes it comes at the worst time possible. That is kind of what we mean by "luck."

Hopefully that makes sense. If not, I'm happy to try to explain further.

EDIT: Moving the concept outside of the realm of sports might help. Take this example. You're in between jobs and have no extra money lying around because you've exhausted your savings while looking for work. Then you get in a little fender bender that you caused. The fender bender was completely your fault and you were in control of every action that led up to it. But you certainly didn't plan for it to happen while you were broke. You say, "it's just my luck that this would happen now." It's not that the fender bender was completely beyond your control, but the timing of it kind of was. Of course you'd be expected to get in a fender bender at some point in your life, but if you could control when it happened, you'd take your fender bender right after you received your tax refund and had some extra money around. But you can't control it, so in a sense, you got a little "unlucky."
blank
Since69
16 years ago
Some favorite quotes:

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Benjamin Disraeli (no, not Mark Twain)

"42.7% of statistics are made up on the spot"
Anonymous

"90% of statistics can be made to say anything."
"Anything?"
"50% of the time..."
Direct TV commercial

"Good Christ, I hate statistics!"
Since69
UserPostedImage
16 years ago
Statistics are a tool, not Scripture. People who understand statistics understand the limitations, and the value.
-Me, just now.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (3h) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (5h) : Great point Martha
beast (5h) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (8h) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (8h) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (10h) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (12h) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (12h) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (12h) : 4rd
dfosterf (12h) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (13h) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (13h) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (13h) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (13h) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (14h) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (14h) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (14h) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (14h) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (14h) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (16h) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (17h) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (18h) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (18h) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (24-Apr) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (24-Apr) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (24-Apr) : I should have put it in quotes
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.