HoustonMatt
16 years ago
Baseball has had in depth statistical analysis, commonly called sabermetrics, for years now, but football has been severely lacking, albeit for legitimate reasons that are beyond the scope of this post. For those not familiar with sabermetrics, Bill James created what is called the Pythagorean Theory. Forget what you learned in school - it has nothing to do with triangles. Rather, it's a formula taking into account runs scored and runs allowed to generate an "expected win-loss record. The formula is remarkably accurate to the point where deviations between actual win-loss record and expected win-loss record can be attribute to luck or randomness.

I could go on for days on this topic, but let me get to the point. (I'll answer specific questions throughout the thread if needed) People are developing similar metrics for football. Here's a site I came across showing the "luckiest" and "unluckiest" NFL teams of this year. As you can expect, the Packers are the unluckiest.

http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/12/luckiest-teams-through-week-15.html 

The numbers show that, according to this person's data and formulas, the Packers "should" have won 3 more games than they have. They "should" be 8-6 rather that 5-9.

Why is this significant? Well, for this year it's not. Our record is what it is. But it's encouraging for next year. What this data means is that if you ran this season through 100 times over, the Packers are likely to win 8 of 14 games more often than not. It means that we're likely to regress towards the mean - that our luck will even out.

That's why I'm not concerned with this team. I truly believe that if you run this exact same squad out next year - minus the injuries - they're likely to win 10 games or more. I'd bet on 11 or 12.

I'll stop here because I could literally write all night about topics like this, so it has to stop somewhere.

NOTE: PLEASE DON'T TURN THIS THREAD INTO AN ANTI-STAT THREAD. IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THIS NATURE IS WORTH A DAMN, SHUT UP AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT THREAD. I HAVE NO INTEREST IN HAVING ANOTHER SUBJECTIVE MEASURE VS OBJECTIVE MEASURE DEBATE. THEY GET NOWHERE.

ps - I give that disclaimer a 5% chance of having any effectiveness.
blank
IronMan
16 years ago
Interesting. Thanks.
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
Well I didn't enjoy my statistics math class one bit personally. I was much more a fan of Algebra to be honest. 🙂
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
brnt247
16 years ago
I have noticed this for a while now. I'm a big baseball fan and know all about Pythagorean Record and expected W/L. The Packers although being 5-9 have scored more than they have given up. That goes to show that a lot of it has had to do with luck, just based off of reason.
blank
HoustonMatt
16 years ago

I have noticed this for a while now. I'm a big baseball fan and know all about Pythagorean Record and expected W/L. The Packers although being 5-9 have scored more than they have given up. That goes to show that a lot of it has had to do with luck, just based off of reason.

"brnt247" wrote:



Exactly. For comparison, we are +32 in points scored vs points allowed. The Dolphins are +14. We're 5-9, they're 9-5.
blank
gopackgo212
16 years ago
No offense to anyone, but be realistic, this is just plain stupid.

Games are won and lost on the field. Not on paper. That's why we play the games in the first place. This is just a poor excuse for a disappointing season. I donno what games you have been watching, but we deserved to lose most of those close losses this year. Be real here. Personally, I think we're lucky to have 5 wins, and lucky to have had a chance in so many of the other games. Go ahead and give me all the stupid stats in the world about baseball and whatnot, it was stupid decisions that cost us those games.

Unless things change drastically, we are going to have a record similar to the lion's next year, don't be shocked if it happens.
16 years ago

Unless things change drastically, we are going to have a record similar to the lion's next year, don't be shocked if it happens.

"gopackgo212" wrote:



0-16 next year eh?

Hi Trolly Troll. How is life under the bridge? :)

Other than some key situational stats, our team has been far better than this record. We need to clean some things up, mature a bit, heal and not get so many penalties. Plus I want some monsters at DT. Other than that, I'm already rearing to go for next season.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
16 years ago
Less about luck, more about improper focus and preparation.

This team made way more mental mistakes than any other I can remember in many years.. even in 05'.. and we were playing with the Taco Wallace types for the later part of the year.

The lack of correction and growth on this team was so disappointing, we regressed in many ways.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
dfosterf
16 years ago
*Rumbles around forum, fails...* Where the HELL did I put my Vet's office/2nd waiting room/Field and Stream article/perch fishing story?...I know I put it somewhere...

:icon_smile:

EDIT-- Found it: (From yesterday)

I was sitting in the "second room" at the vets office last night, waiting to pick up Max. (He is still mad at me for having to spend the weekend there).

On one of the end tables was (I think) a "Field and Stream". Everyone knows what to do with a "Field and Stream". You go to the back page, and this is what I did. The author instantly had my close attention, because he was writing about white perch fishing on the Potomac river. (Homie thing, and something I have done in the environs of which he spoke)

Of course being in the second waiting room I was afforded the opportunity to read the whole article, and as anyone that has read the back page of this publication will attest, it has little to do with the fishing and a lot to do with life in general.

Something rather funny (amazing how the humor assists in the comprehension) struck me in that article. The author was describing his previous 4 attempts at white perch fishing on these stomping grounds, and his failures in those attempts, coupled with his complete success on this, his fifth "trip" there.

He said, "...this is the thing I have learned about luck." "It is absolutely indistinguishable from failure right up to the exact moment that you have it."

I liked that statement. I'm contemplating if he was even talking about luck.
Pack93z
16 years ago

*Rumbles around forum, fails...* Where the HELL did I put my Vet's office/2nd waiting room/Field and Stream article/perch fishing story?...I know I put it somewhere...

:icon_smile:

"dfosterf" wrote:



I take a day off from the board and look what happens.. Foster loses his thread..

Me.. after kicking it in the butt yesterday for 15 hours at work.. I have recharged the pissed off batteries of frustration at this team.. :lol:

Oh and a healthy dose of optimism for next season as well. Being close in every game increases the frustration but it also allows one much hope with an adjustment here and there that this team can bounce back very well.

I think the changes are coming soon..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
beast (17m) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (8h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (13h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (14h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
25m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10h / Random Babble / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.