Baseball has had in depth statistical analysis, commonly called sabermetrics, for years now, but football has been severely lacking, albeit for legitimate reasons that are beyond the scope of this post. For those not familiar with sabermetrics, Bill James created what is called the Pythagorean Theory. Forget what you learned in school - it has nothing to do with triangles. Rather, it's a formula taking into account runs scored and runs allowed to generate an "expected win-loss record. The formula is remarkably accurate to the point where deviations between actual win-loss record and expected win-loss record can be attribute to luck or randomness.
I could go on for days on this topic, but let me get to the point. (I'll answer specific questions throughout the thread if needed) People are developing similar metrics for football. Here's a site I came across showing the "luckiest" and "unluckiest" NFL teams of this year. As you can expect, the Packers are the unluckiest.
http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/12/luckiest-teams-through-week-15.html The numbers show that, according to this person's data and formulas, the Packers "should" have won 3 more games than they have. They "should" be 8-6 rather that 5-9.
Why is this significant? Well, for this year it's not. Our record is what it is. But it's encouraging for next year. What this data means is that if you ran this season through 100 times over, the Packers are likely to win 8 of 14 games more often than not. It means that we're likely to regress towards the mean - that our luck will even out.
That's why I'm not concerned with this team. I truly believe that if you run this exact same squad out next year - minus the injuries - they're likely to win 10 games or more. I'd bet on 11 or 12.
I'll stop here because I could literally write all night about topics like this, so it has to stop somewhere.
NOTE: PLEASE DON'T TURN THIS THREAD INTO AN ANTI-STAT THREAD. IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THIS NATURE IS WORTH A DAMN, SHUT UP AND MOVE ON TO THE NEXT THREAD. I HAVE NO INTEREST IN HAVING ANOTHER SUBJECTIVE MEASURE VS OBJECTIVE MEASURE DEBATE. THEY GET NOWHERE.
ps - I give that disclaimer a 5% chance of having any effectiveness.