wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago



It hasn't been the best contract season for Packers wide receiver Greg Jennings. A groin injury has limited him to playing just six games and 21 receptions. Although he could still have a big impact for the NFC North champions in the playoffs, he doesn't see staying in Green Bay beyond January and February.

Jennings, in an interview with the NFL Network's "NFL AM" program on Tuesday, said he's made "a calculated guess" the Packers won't bring him back next season. Jennings would like to return to an offense with Aaron Rodgers throwing him the ball, but unfortunately, his absence has shown the Packers can get along well without splurging to retain his services.

While Jennings and fellow starter Jordy Nelson (hamstring) have spent time on the shelf, Rodgers has found a groove with elevated play from Randall Cobb and James Jones. Cobb has especially proved, with his second-year production (77 receptions, 892 yards, seven touchdowns) that he's ready to take on a full-time starting role in 2013. In addition, both Nelson and Jones are signed through next season for reasonable, sub-$3 million contracts.

Jennings also told the NFL Network he prefers not to be franchise-tagged, despite the fact that one-year value is expected to be around $9.7 million for wide receivers in 2013. As an unrestricted free agent, the 29-year-old would draw plenty of interest, competing with the likes of the Steelers' Mike Wallace and the Patriots' Wes Welker for jobs on the open market.



link 
UserPostedImage
Porforis
12 years ago
While Cobb has emerged as a top talent and Jones has seemed to become Mister Reliable this year, I can't see us ditching both Finley and Jennings unless we get at least a solid #3 WR to replace them. We're loaded at WR but that doesn't mean we should ditch a third of our talent, unless we got someone decent for the OL or DL out of it.
Pack93z
12 years ago

While Cobb has emerged as a top talent and Jones has seemed to become Mister Reliable this year, I can't see us ditching both Finley and Jennings unless we get at least a solid #3 WR to replace them.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



I guess Nelson went from a possible #1 to less than #3 in a season. [grin1]
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
musccy
12 years ago

While Cobb has emerged as a top talent and Jones has seemed to become Mister Reliable this year, I can't see us ditching both Finley and Jennings unless we get at least a solid #3 WR to replace them. We're loaded at WR but that doesn't mean we should ditch a third of our talent, unless we got someone decent for the OL or DL out of it.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 




Agreed, and 1 good season out of Jones does not instill a lot of confidence in me. I still find myself pleasently surprised everytime he catches the ball.

With the supposed potential of DJ Williams and Quarless, along with a desire and ability to block, McGinn's article (although ill-timed) makes sense to me, and I'd rather see Finley walk in the hopes of retaining GJ, and then working long-terms with Raji, AR, and CM3
Porforis
12 years ago

I guess Nelson went from a possible #1 to less than #3 in a season. [grin1]

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



#3 or 4... No idea where any of these guys really should fall. This season's Jones = #2 or #3 behind Nelson and possibly Cobb. Last season's Jones would be #4 behind Cobb, Nelson, and hopefully someone more reliable than last season's Jones. In any case, I don't want to be two injuries away from only having one WR that's seen any significant amount of NFL action. Boykin does not count.

While I'm fine with Crabtree replacing Finley, the fact of the matter is that Finley really was more of an oversized WR than a tight end.
PackFanWithTwins
12 years ago
Jennings is not a #1 WR and is not worth #1 money, and if that is what he wants, best of luck someplace else, and he better hope that someplace else has a QB. Jennings has no idea what it is like to not have a top QB, and complementary receiving options.

With Jennings, we are sitting on 4 #2 WR, and the only way that could get better is a 5th #2. Our passing game is dangerous because any of our options, can play any of the positions. And any of them are better than the other teams #3 and #4 DBs.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

Jennings is not a #1 WR and is not worth #1 money, and if that is what he wants, best of luck someplace else, and he better hope that someplace else has a QB. Jennings has no idea what it is like to not have a top QB, and complementary receiving options.

With Jennings, we are sitting on 4 #2 WR, and the only way that could get better is a 5th #2. Our passing game is dangerous because any of our options, can play any of the positions. And any of them are better than the other teams #3 and #4 DBs.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



He may not be a #1 without Aaron Rodgers throwing him the ball. That said I can not begrudge him getting the mega contract. I would prefer he remain in GB at a discounted price but I don't see that being very likely.
UserPostedImage
rabidgopher04
12 years ago
Greg Jennings has more flash than the other receivers on the team besides Cobb. He is more electric than Nelson or Jones, but with the emergence of Cobb I don't see the need to keep Jennings since there are guys at other positions that need to be locked up.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
Pack93z
12 years ago



With Jennings, we are sitting on 4 #2 WR, and the only way that could get better is a 5th #2. Our passing game is dangerous because any of our options, can play any of the positions. And any of them are better than the other teams #3 and #4 DBs.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



This is exactly what made us dangerous.. each week any of the options could rip the oppositions competitive heart out. Injuries have shown us to what degree the recipe worked.. we are still viable with 2 or 3 options on the field, but not explosive.

With this type of balance, it should allow for all receivers to be happy. It was clear that Jennings wanted more in the preseason.. hasn't changed with a season full of injury and little production.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

This is exactly what made us dangerous.. each week any of the options could rip the oppositions competitive heart out. Injuries have shown us to what degree the recipe worked.. we are still viable with 2 or 3 options on the field, but not explosive.

We this type of balance, it should allow for all receivers to be happy. It was clear that Jennings wanted more in the preseason.. hasn't changed with a season full of injury and little production.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



It is the same old story. Players tell management, "Don't pay me for my performance. pay me for what my performance COULD be." The Jerry Jones of the world do. Uncle Teddy doesn't.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (20h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (20h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.