Think about this comment. It took two years? So we were supposed to be disappointed in him right away even though its common thought to give players three years to come around?
Or our coaches should be blasting first year players right out of the gate when they hit they second year which often times happens to be sophomore slump?
"pack93z" wrote:
Okay.. two years might be a reach.. lets go with a back mid way through last season.
Hawk came out of the blocks his rookie year and played well.. maybe not earth shatteringly impactful but was very solid.
Fast forward to half way through the 07 season.. his play was slipping and he went from making a difference to being just solid.. right then, 20 games into his career, you bet your ass they should have been on him in practice.. maybe not in the press, but he has more talent that he has shown the last year and a half... exception was opening night this year.. he was all over the place.
My point, is, if you accept even a young player to get by and not play up to potential, it sets a pattern of a player that will never reach potential.
From what I see, we have a large number of players not playing up to their potential.. that speaks volumes to me in the job of the guys getting them ready to play.
Which is why in the first place I asked why Winston Moss.. right next to the offensive line, doing the least with the talent they have in front of them.
If it is the scheme, the Assistant Head Coach should be able to effectively communicate with the Sanders to get the scheme adjusted for the Backers to be successful.
To date.. it isn't happening because the Backers are still under performing. Which is basically my viewpoint and basis in the first place.
"Zero2Cool" wrote: