It still seems that some people are not getting my point.
I NEVER said that the Packers are better off WITH Favre. I NEVER said that Rodgers is an inadequate leader.
What I said was that Favre's legend, his aura elevated the overall team attitude and effort in 2007.
It brought more out of the team. In all catagories. ARE THER STATISTICS TO MEASURE THAT? I don't think so.
The 2008 Packers team doesn't seem to have that extra gear the 2007 team had... I think it was the LEGEND of Favre that precipitated an overachieving 2007 season. Sometimes playing with a legend makes you a a bit better. That, multiplied by 43 takes the WHOLE team to another level.
The point that seems to get lost is that I am not COMPARING Favre to Rodgers, instead pointing out that the Favre factor or the REGGIE factor or the CHUCK NORRIS factor, whatever made the players a bit more committed, give more heartful efforts, and raise their game to another level is MISSING this year... At least recently.
I mentioned the Favre factor because this team didn't know a Reggie White and likely doesn't know Chuck Norris.
RP made a good point. And I appreciate the empirical data searchers but, there are somethings that statistics don't show. To me, THAT is the Favre factor.
I hope that Rodgers keeps kicking ass next 3 games to improve his rating and the chances for the Packers to finish strong but I see the team lacking a bit of that edge of a championship bound team.
BTW, Chuck Norris had nothing to do with the US Karate team story.