nerdmann
12 years ago
CedBen sucked.

Remember against the Bares last year? Starks was going nowhere fast but Grant was finding the holes.

Where was Green today? Didn't even give him a chance.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Rios39
12 years ago
the Defense struggled in the 2nd quarter but they made plenty of stops and the ball was given in the hands of Rodgers to perform. That pick spotting them at our 30 was the game. Those picks can not happen, credit their defense and offense but our defense at least made some plays to get off the field, our offense couldn't move the ball or sustain drives and that's why we lost.
blank
dfosterf
12 years ago
I don't think this line in this scheme can open a hole.
steveishere
12 years ago

the Defense struggled in the 2nd quarter but they made plenty of stops and the ball was given in the hands of Rodgers to perform. That pick spotting them at our 30 was the game. Those picks can not happen, credit their defense and offense but our defense at least made some plays to get off the field, our offense couldn't move the ball or sustain drives and that's why we lost.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 



The defense didn't do a good job at all of getting themselves off the field. SF was routinely driving the ball and getting first downs at will. A couple stops doesn't change that. There is no "that's why we lost" pertaining to one side or the other. The team failed on both sides of the ball.
Pack93z
12 years ago

I don't think this line in this scheme can open a hole.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



I would have no problem shit canning the Oline coaches.. every night, as I lay in bed after the evening prayers.. I hope they can their asses.. four plus seasons it has failed.. but I shall continue. [grin1]

It is not a personnel problem.. it is coaching and scheme. Shit can it.

There.. that is about as angry as I can get.

I think in the long run.. this loss will do more help than harm for the 2012 edition of the Packers.. they have to get more physical.. simply put.

The good news.. we left a very physical game pretty much without any damning injuries. Nelson's shot in the back of the head not withstanding.. that was a shot.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
porky88
12 years ago
The game was a mess on both sides of the ball. I'm more disappointed in the offense. There was no rhythm. The offensive linemen were making poor reads, Rodgers was under duress, and the wide receivers struggle against physical coverage. We can harp on the play calling, but nobody got open. I saw no sense of urgency. It'll probably be a common comparison, but the Packer offense played much as they did against the Giants last postseason.

Last year, Green Bay's offense got up on their opponents, so naturally the passing yardage data was skewed. This time, San Francisco got up and exposed Green Bay's lack of physicality against the run. The 49ers beat them off the ball and they punched them in the mouth.

With that said, I saw some pass rush. Clay Matthews looked rejuvenated, but it'll be all for nothing if they can't get consistent pressure opposite of him. The 49ers were content with Joe Staley matching up with him. Most teams, especially Chicago, will double-team Mathews.

Nick Perry is a raw talent, but I see the potential. Jerel Worthy will have games like these. It's sad his best performance has come in a scrimmage, but he disappears for spurts. This was the knock on him.

Overall, it's just one game, but the better team today won. The Packers have a goal in mind and they can achieve that goal, but they're going to need to develop within the season. I hope to see the team transform into the hunter rather than the hunted. Perhaps today is the beginning of that transformation.
Rios39
12 years ago

The defense didn't do a good job at all of getting themselves off the field. SF was routinely driving the ball and getting first downs at will. A couple stops doesn't change that. There is no "that's why we lost" pertaining to one side or the other. The team failed on both sides of the ball.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



I'll give you that both sides sucked. but in the 2nd half the D made the stops needed to get back into it. That 63 yard field goal changed the entire game feel IMO. Put us in chasing mode for the entire rest of the game instead of one possession.


blank
Rios39
12 years ago

The game was a mess on both sides of the ball. I'm more disappointed in the offense. There was no rhythm. The offensive linemen were making poor reads, Rodgers was under duress, and the wide receivers struggle against physical coverage. We can harp on the play calling, but nobody got open. I saw no sense of urgency. It'll probably be a common comparison, but the Packer offense played much as they did against the Giants last postseason.

Last year, Green Bay's offense got up on their opponents, so naturally the passing yardage data was skewed. This time, San Francisco got up and exposed Green Bay's lack of physicality against the run. The 49ers beat them off the ball and they punched them in the mouth.

With that said, I saw some pass rush. Clay Matthews looked rejuvenated, but it'll be all for nothing if they can't get consistent pressure opposite of him. The 49ers were content with Joe Staley matching up with him. Most teams, especially Chicago, will double-team Mathews.

Nick Perry is a raw talent, but I see the potential. Jerel Worthy will have games like these. It's sad his best performance has come in a scrimmage, but he disappears for spurts. This was the knock on him.

Overall, it's just one game, but the better team today won. The Packers have a goal in mind and they can achieve that goal, but they're going to need to develop within the season. I hope to see the team transform into the hunter rather than the hunted. Perhaps today is the beginning of that transformation.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Good post but I was expecting more pass rush from the 49ers. We struggled a bit early with pass protection but later in the game it was completely fine. Newhouse out-performed my expectations.


blank
musccy
12 years ago

I'll give you that both sides sucked. but in the 2nd half the D made the stops needed to get back into it. That 63 yard field goal changed the entire game feel IMO. Put us in chasing mode for the entire rest of the game instead of one possession.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 



Weren't the Packers behind the entire game, thus always in chase mode? I'm just nit-picking, I understand what you're getting at. I had this shitty feeling when they didn't convert on 1st down and the clock didn't move on the previous possession that they should have just run out the clock since they were only at the 15 and got the ball to start the 2nd half.
Pack93z
12 years ago
The Packers simply got beat by a more physical and complete team.. this is the wakeup call, an early one, now lets see how they handle it.

This is where the rubber meets the road.. we shall see if this team gets up off the mat.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    wpr (3h) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (23h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
    Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
    dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
    Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
    Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
    wpr (9-Apr) : yay
    Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
    Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
    Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
    Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
    Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    1h / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.