Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Fine. Don't waste Woodson on Moss. Put Bush on Moss and rough up Moss and take him out of the game. Then let Williams and Shields concentrate on Manningham and Crabtree.

You see this. I see this. Neither of us are making a million a year in the NFL.

How come Dom Capers doesn't see this?

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




I dunno man, I keep deferring my thoughts to there just has to be something I don't know about defensive schemes. As a QB, I would LOVE to play against zone defense all day because there's always a window for your WR, especially if you have a strong arm. You could hit shit left and right over the middle... 5 yards here, 8 yards there, possible big gain here or there and best part ... you only need a 3 step drop which nullifies a pass rush!

Again, I dunno. There just has to be something I don't comprehend about defensive schemes.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
12 years ago

Fine. Don't waste Woodson on Moss. Put Bush on Moss and rough up Moss and take him out of the game. Then let Williams and Shields concentrate on Manningham and Crabtree.

You see this. I see this. Neither of us are making a million a year in the NFL.

How come Dom Capers doesn't see this?

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Maybe the part where the safeties leave the middle of the field wide open. Or come shallow and leave the middle and deep open.

The issues are right in front of us to see.. we have issues in the backend. Between the lines.. I think you can tell Woodson wants to go off on it.. but he isn't.

Why play soft.. because you lack the trust over the top to make the correct read. Why spread the backers out and play a zone where a backer is on a WR? They stayed in base to keep Woodson in the back.. get caught.. get burned.

Play soft.. get thrown on repeatedly. Play bump.. gotta trust the backend or get torched over the top for a big play.

For me.. it is pretty apparent.. we have awareness issues in the backend of the secondary.. we have really two guys that can be flat out trusted at the moments.. Williams and Woodson.

So you have a physical talent in Burnett in which we are hoping the light clicks soon for, and a handful of other safeties in which they are working through. MD Jennings got replaced with McMillan for Thursday night already. More confusion in the backend, don't be surprised if Burnett is next. Common element on the field with our communication issues has been Burnett. Sooner or later it might be the common thread that may be the problem.. maybe not. But ask yourself this, is he in position to make a play often? And when does he? Gore's scamper down the sideline after the Arod pick, Burnett gives it a half assed dive attempt at a tackle.

Capers and company are trying to mask an issue.. and it keeps getting picked open. (Speaking of picks, I haven't heard one person complain yet about the illegal picks the Niners were running, not rubs.. picks but I digress)

If it was my call.. I start McMillian and Richardson as soon as possible.. let one play base and the other comes in on Nickels and Dimes. We see the same issues over and over with any combination with Burnett.. sooner or later we have to see if the is the source.

To address a situation you have to have options.. aright now some of those options are a work in progress. Wanna go young.. this is what you have.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Maybe the part where the safeties leave the middle of the field wide open. Or come shallow and leave the middle and deep open.

The issues are right in front of us to see.. we have issues in the backend. Between the lines.. I think you can tell Woodson wants to go off on it.. but he isn't.

Why play soft.. because you lack the trust over the top to make the correct read. Why spread the backers out and play a zone where a backer is on a WR? They stayed in base to keep Woodson in the back.. get caught.. get burned.

Play soft.. get thrown on repeatedly. Play bump.. gotta trust the backend or get torched over the top for a big play.

For me.. it is pretty apparent.. we have awareness issues in the backend of the secondary.. we have really two guys that can be flat out trusted at the moments.. Williams and Woodson.

So you have a physical talent in Burnett in which we are hoping the light clicks soon for, and a handful of other safeties in which they are working through. MD Jennings got replaced with McMillan for Thursday night already. More confusion in the backend, don't be surprised if Burnett is next. Common element on the field with our communication issues has been Burnett. Sooner or later it might be the common thread that may be the problem.. maybe not. But ask yourself this, is he in position to make a play often? And when does he? Gore's scamper down the sideline after the Arod pick, Burnett gives it a half assed dive attempt at a tackle.

Capers and company are trying to mask an issue.. and it keeps getting picked open. (Speaking of picks, I haven't heard one person complain yet about the illegal picks the Niners were running, not rubs.. picks but I digress)

If it was my call.. I start McMillian and Richardson as soon as possible.. let one play base and the other comes in on Nickels and Dimes. We see the same issues over and over with any combination with Burnett.. sooner or later we have to see if the is the source.

To address a situation you have to have options.. aright now some of those options are a work in progress. Wanna go young.. this is what you have.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Pack - Yes. I understand this.

But I think you'll agree with this point. If you are to ERR, err on the side of being aggressive. Wouldn't you much rather go down swinging?

Jamming Moss at the line will get inside his head and if we play the Niners again in the Playoffs, he'll remember that. Moss is a head case. It doesn't take someone with a PhD in Abnormal Psychology to know this. Heck, even the Pats didn't want him despite his ass kissing to the Kraft family. The Niners got him out of desperation because they wanted to make a one-year SB push as Gore won't be an elite RB forever and Gore is still the heart and soul of that O. I can guarantee you that the Niner management argued back and forth if they wanted Moss and they reluctantly agreed to get him, instead of being excited to get him.

As for the Niners picks, jam 'em at the line and that would make the picks more difficult to do. Fight fire with fire, baby! [boxing]

So old Zombieslayer rule - if you're gonna go down, go down swingin'.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
zombieslayer
12 years ago

I dunno man, I keep deferring my thoughts to there just has to be something I don't know about defensive schemes. As a QB, I would LOVE to play against zone defense all day because there's always a window for your WR, especially if you have a strong arm. You could hit shit left and right over the middle... 5 yards here, 8 yards there, possible big gain here or there and best part ... you only need a 3 step drop which nullifies a pass rush!

Again, I dunno. There just has to be something I don't comprehend about defensive schemes.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



You know more than you think you know. You understood that Moss can be taken out with physical contact at the LoS.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Pack93z
12 years ago
And he has tried that as well.. we didn't lead the league in explosive plays given up for nothing last season.

Piss poor tackling and getting beaten like a drum.


Now.. with improvements (I seen better push this past weekend than last year) yes I probably would do what I could to increase the pressure applied.

But I think the thinking is.. bleed slowly or gash it wide open. Neither is a formula for success.

I don't know all the answers.. I only can see what I can be afforded to see. I would argue that we should have been playing the regulars in the preseason more to work through these issues.. but then if someone goes down it is going to be hell to pay there.

Not trying to excuse it.. but trying to rationalize it. No matter how we slice it, until the problem is rectified.. scheme it all you want... it still a wart. It is the coaching staff's responsibility to fix it.. just pointing out materials gotta be there to fix it.

BTW, with a press team you better be able to tackle, we don't do that well either. The get off clean and run a slant.. that safety better be ready. Additionally my first post after the game.. I stated I would have pressed Moss from the first catch on.. dude dropped faster than a hot knife through butter when defender got within yards of him.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
zombieslayer
12 years ago

And he has tried that as well.. we didn't lead the league in explosive plays given up for nothing last season.

Piss poor tackling and getting beaten like a drum.


Now.. with improvements (I seen better push this past weekend than last year) yes I probably would do what I could to increase the pressure applied.

But I think the thinking is.. bleed slowly or gash it wide open. Neither is a formula for success.

I don't know all the answers.. I only can see what I can be afforded to see. I would argue that we should have been playing the regulars in the preseason more to work through these issues.. but then if someone goes down it is going to be hell to pay there.

Not trying to excuse it.. but trying to rationalize it. No matter how we slice it, until the problem is rectified.. scheme it all you want... it still a wart. It is the coaching staff's responsibility to fix it.. just pointing out materials gotta be there to fix it.

BTW, with a press team you better be able to tackle, we don't do that well either. The get off clean and run a slant.. that safety better be ready. Additionally my first post after the game.. I stated I would have pressed Moss from the first catch on.. dude dropped faster than a hot knife through butter when defender got within yards of him.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



And this is exactly why I am doom and gloom about 2012. I think 2011 was SO bad, it will take 2 years to fix. 🇹🇹 spent 2012 on fixing the pass rush. He'll continue working on the pass rush in 2013 while getting us the best DBs he possibly can. We should be ready for a SB push by 2013.

2012 may be a lost year. I REALLY hope I'm wrong, but I simply don't think we have the D to win it all this year. I know VR gets wood every time I say this, but whatever. Sometimes it sucks speaking the truth.

(Our O will be fine as long as 🇦🇷 is healthy, our OL is average or better, and our receiving staff is good or better).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
macbob
12 years ago

I REALLY hope I'm wrong, but I simply don't think we have the D to win it all this year.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



They certainly weren't good enough in the first game. We've had significant turnover between last year in this year, with Collins gone, Woody moving to Safety, Bush taking over Woody's CB spot, Bishop out and DJ Smith taking his place, CM3 moving back to the right side and Perry settling in at LOLB. I'm not ready to give up on the Defense, but will be watching closely for improvement week-to-week, the sooner the better.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (50m) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
    buckeyepackfan (1h) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
    Zero2Cool (7h) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
    wpr (8h) : I made it through the 1st Q.
    dfosterf (17h) : Just gotta figure out how.
    dfosterf (17h) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
    beast (17h) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
    Mucky Tundra (17h) : Sooooooo many penalties
    Mucky Tundra (18h) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
    Zero2Cool (18h) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
    dfosterf (18h) : Well that half was fun
    Zero2Cool (20h) : Great, zayne is down
    Zero2Cool (20h) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
    Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
    Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
    TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
    Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
    beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
    beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
    beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
    Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
    dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds
    wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay
    dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.
    Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed
    Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL
    Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him
    Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?
    dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing
    Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in
    Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    21m / Around The NFL / beast

    1h / Fantasy Sports Talk / buckeyepackfan

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    13h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    8-Aug / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

    8-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    5-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    4-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    3-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    3-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    2-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.