DakotaT
12 years ago

I know the reason he dropped to the 7th. Point is he was still there. What has he done between April and August that suddenly makes all the other teams want him so badly? Every single one of them could have had him in the 6th and passed on him.

Truth is an injury to one of their other linemen may be more of a factor in signing him than what he has done himself.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Because it is a tackle starved league. We're damn lucky to have Newhouse and Sherrod when he comes back.


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

Because it is a tackle starved league. We're damn lucky to have Newhouse and Sherrod when he comes back.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



yep. I think some teams will be looking. I just read that one of the OT for AZ is injured. I don't know how serious it is.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
12 years ago
I would not like to sit in those new seats. I have a thing about heights and that shit gets up there.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
zombieslayer
12 years ago
Oh, just so people get the proper credit, I didn't post anything. That was Buckeye. I just opened up the Word doc and put it into a Java code block so nobody has to download Buckeye's list in order to read it. Not everyone has Word, including me, but we have a Mac viewer that can read Word docs.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. šŸ‡¹šŸ‡¹ šŸ‡²šŸ‡² šŸ‡¦šŸ‡·
Pack93z
12 years ago
I did this Friday.. but how I viewed the roster on Friday.

I only have 52 spots penciled in.. with a couple on the PUP.. I put Bishop on IR already. I think the most logical spot for him.. to bad the PA is holding up the flex IR spot.. he might be one to benefit from that.

R is a roster spot.. PUP is PUP.. IR is IR. Detail attached.. best to view in separate tab.

UserPostedImage  Roster08202012.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
beast
12 years ago

I did this Friday.. but how I viewed the roster on Friday.

I only have 52 spots penciled in.. with a couple on the PUP.. I put Bishop on IR already. I think the most logical spot for him.. to bad the PA is holding up the flex IR spot.. he might be one to benefit from that.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Did you cut Starks completely? Not even IR?


You have 52, this is what I would change in mind.

I would of cut Coleman and risk getting him to the practice squad. 51 on the main roster now.

I haven't notice anything from Wynn for me to want to keep him around, I'd cut him... heck I want to tell him to lose weight and try out for OLB next year. (I was saying the same thing for Jason Hunter who played decent at 3-4 OLB with the Broncos for a year, before they switched back to the 4-3). 50 on the main roster now.

I also noticed a lot from Walden that I don't like, I wouldn't mind cutting him but no one has really stepped up... though I could argue Jones would be better on STs and about equally as bad at OLB. And Jones might make a better back-up at the Jack spot (Bishop's/Smith's ILB role) than Lattimore and Manning. But let just say keep two of the three following Walden, Jones and Lattimore. Still 50 on the main roster.

I'd keep Stark around, he might have to go on the IR but I have liked him a lot more than Saine and haven't seen much from Green yet and if Benson gets caught with drugs he'll be out a year... I'd keep all 4. 51 on my main roster.

Teams keep 7 OL guys on the active game day roster... one of those goes down and no one else on the roster to step up? That sounds like a lot of trouble. I could argue keeping a couple of them on PS instead, but you'd have to cut or IR someone to move one of them up... which if you have a free IR spot is fine, but if you don't it's trouble. So I'd keep another OG around, Dominguez or Wells most likely, but some decent potential in the rookie UDFAs which one or two should get a PS spot. 52 on my main roster.

The Packers have kept 6 CBs the last 2 or 3 years... and now Capers is talking about playing more dime defense... if the guys step up I think they could keep a 7th... and I think he'd be Ross. I don't think he's great but he tackles and is aggressive like Bush (which are Bush's strong points) and I think Ross could stick. Shields has disappeared... I wonder if they might put him on the IR... but anyways adding Ross would make 53 on the main roster.


Also I'd think about keeping Neal and maybe Hargrove on the reserve list... a guy on the DL might have to go to the IR and they could be there waiting to fill in the spot. But they could cut them before putting them on the main roster if the team doesn't want them then.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
12 years ago

Did you cut Starks completely? Not even IR?


You have 52, this is what I would change in mind.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Why I have 52 and not 53 is almost completely dedicated to the running backs.

Do we have 3 healthy tailbacks or not.

If Benson, Green and Saine are healthy.. yes the odd man out in my list would be Starks.

Benson to me is going to provide the toughness we need between the tackle.. not going to hit a home run.. but is going to grind on Sunday.

Green gives us a dimension we didn't have last season.. a player that operates smoothly in open space.

Saine, IMO, is the "Dirty Jobs" type player.. ask him to do it.. and he is going to do it and do it well. Saine is the type of back the Patriots have had in Faulk.

Kuhn is the other physical type back that will do the dirty work.. I just don't think he is going to be healthy enough to be that physical presence all season.. hence the Benson need.

So... I go with 4 backs here.. if they are healthy.

One of the TE's can fill the blocking type role in the backfield if need be.. hence the limit on FB and an extra TE.

I would like to pencil in another WR.. but I think the Packers think they can score with anyone and shift the spare parts to defense and special teams. If I pencil in another WR.. it would be difficult not to have Boykins be that guy right now after two games.

Heavy on box players on defense... there will not be a shortage of guys to rotate in there.

Now.. Hargrove being suspended for 8 games might change the count a bit.. but I think the Packers roll the dice and keep him on the roster. Think of it as a mid season addition if we need it.



That being said.. we probably pick up at least 1 to 2 players at cut downs.. and those last 5 on the roster will come down to special teams.

Next rendition should have two categories.. locks and bubbles.. bubbles that may pop at any moment. šŸ™‚

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
Shawn took 52 because he is waiting to add another QB!!
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
12 years ago
I don't know about the final 53, but IMHO the Packers are 1 injury away from disaster.
A Rodgers injury{concussion} or any injury to the OL starters is going to cost us as there is no running game to speak of.
On defense there doesn't appear to be an appreciable difference from last year as they're depending on 1st year players to contribute big time.
buckeyepackfan
12 years ago
Thanks evryone for the feedback, I'll try to explain some of my thinking, and answer the questions posed.

First I failed to place Hargrove on my IR/PUP/SUSP list, I'm not completely sure what The Packers options are,but do know he does not have to take up a roster spot and I do believe he will end up on the 53 man roster at some point

I also have Walden on the 53 man roster, but he will be suspended the 1st game, so someone is going to get a chance to prove themselves, and it could be Walden is released.(I just think that he has shown at times the ability to put pressure on the QB and Ted and Mike want to give him another chance.

Brett Good ended up on The Def. side just to even out the columns. My original download has him, Crosby, and Masthay's names in red denoting Special team players.

My thinking with Daniels and Datko is that they can be put on the PS,not sure if Dominguez is eligible for PS, if he is then I would switch him with Datko.

Ted can protect Datko, but if another team really did want him then I agree that Datko would make roster over Dominguez.

Same with Daniels, but I really don't think another team will come after him right away.

There was a question about Gurley making the final roster, I don't think there is room for both him and Borel on the PS again this year, with only 4 TE's making the roster that opens up a spot for another WR. I picked Gurley pretty much because of his size. I believe he can be a help on Special Teams.

I know there are still 2 weeks left in the pre-season and a hundred things can change in that time, but it will be fun to come back to this in a couple of weeks just to see how I did.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : The menu you expanded to log in, it's the first icon under "PackersHome" .. maybe i should add text to it
dfosterf (2h) : Feelin' pfowish can't find the sun. No big deal, will drag a laptop out when the time comes
Zero2Cool (2h) : if you're on mobile, open the menu and its the "sun" icon
dfosterf (2h) : Can't find the toggle, lol
dfosterf (2h) : I can find that the Microsoft lady rep for Titletown Tech is the philanthropy boss for the entire Microsoft corporation, but. .
Zero2Cool (2h) : There's a toggle for light/dark theme. Super easy.
dfosterf (3h) : The white background beta was hard to read, especially the quotes
dfosterf (3h) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
dfosterf (3h) : *Friday*
dfosterf (3h) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
dfosterf (3h) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
dfosterf (3h) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
dfosterf (4h) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
Zero2Cool (4h) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
dfosterf (4h) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
dfosterf (4h) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
beast (4h) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
beast (4h) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
beast (4h) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
beast (4h) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
dfosterf (4h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
dfosterf (4h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
dfosterf (4h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
dfosterf (4h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
beast (11h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: ā€œA great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.ā€
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates ā€œmany Packers gamesā€ being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
2h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.