Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Rockmolder
12 years ago
This couldn't have possibly gone any other way than it turned out, Favre discussions we've had about 900 times before.

Since, apart from the whole Favre debacle, everyone will be making pledges of love to both Hutson and Starr, I'll throw in, from a very-much-biased view, Willie Davis.

Also, the (near) complete absence of either Reggie White and/or Forrest Gregg is a shame.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago

This couldn't have possibly gone any other way than it turned out, Favre discussions we've had about 900 times before.

Since, apart from the whole Favre debacle, everyone will be making pledges of love to both Hutson and Starr, I'll throw in, from a very-much-biased view, Willie Davis.

Also, the (near) complete absence of either Reggie White and/or Forrest Gregg is a shame.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



Welcome back, Rock! Where you been? Doubtless spending all that time with the girlfriend or other young people things.

Anyway, it's good to see you back.




And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

Welcome back, Rock! Where you been? Doubtless spending all that time with the girlfriend or other young people things.

Anyway, it's good to see you back.

Originally Posted by: Wade 





Euro Cup is over.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
12 years ago

This couldn't have possibly gone any other way than it turned out, Favre discussions we've had about 900 times before.

Since, apart from the whole Favre debacle, everyone will be making pledges of love to both Hutson and Starr, I'll throw in, from a very-much-biased view, Willie Davis.

Also, the (near) complete absence of either Reggie White and/or Forrest Gregg is a shame.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



There is a difference between being a HOF player and the best ever. Reggie gets some love. Forrest won't compare to Hutson or Starr or Favre in that category.

Even if he did it is almost impossible to say, in general, an OL player was the greatest player on the team.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
12 years ago

Way to go Dex I want to see if I can play your game

93 and 95 teams got beat by a dynasty in the Cowboys you know the ones that won 3 Super Bowls in 4 years. (Granted. Still doesn't change the fact Favre choked or played poorly in critical games.)

98 playoff game against San Fran let's see you forgot the no fumble called against Rice and the defense giving up a last second TD to Owens. (Granted. Still doesn't change the fact Favre played poorly in a critical game)

01 I will give you but what did we have for weapons that year oh ya we had Billy Schroeder and Freeman going against the greatest show on turf. (BS. The margin of victory was the 28 Favre scored for St Louis. I would imagine that 6 more completions to the right team would have been enough to win a tie game.)

02 Vick killed us with his running and the blocked punt was all on Favre. (Granted. Favre still played poorly in a critical game.)

03 That team was over achievers that won on emotion and you even said it 4th and 26th and needing 1 more yard with 200 yards rushing. Before halftime we are kept out of the endzone on a 4th and 1 at the 1. And ofcourse the choke job by the defense on 4-26th. But yes your right it was Favre that choked. (Just because the D choked too, it doesn't mean that Favre didn't. It also doesn't change the fact that Favre played poorly in a critical game.)

04 Minnesota quarterback Daunte Culpepper killed the Packers in every way possible, finishing with a superb 137.1 passer rating and throwing four touchdown passes and no interceptions. He pounced on the Packers’ mishaps and coverage breakdowns that have plagued Slowik’s defense all season. (Granted, Still doesn't change the fact that Favre played poorly in a critical game.)

yes that was Favre's fault seeing he lost his only threat in Walker in the 3rd quarter.



07 Giants game, ya we couldn't run the ball and going against an awesome defense that shut down the record breaking Pats in the Super Bowl. You forget the Giants missed 2 fgs and we had that awesome running game which had 28 yards for the game. (Granted. Still doesn't address my point. The point that Favre choked in a critical game.)





See your hatred for Favre makes you blind to other parts of the game, Yes Favre was at fault in those losses as was everyone on that team.

But yet your saying Rodgers didn't do anything wrong in his 2 playoff losses isn't really fair. The 2 playoff losses were really on the defense but Rodgers and the offense had parts in it.


Now lets get back on topic

Originally Posted by: dhazer 



I didn't say, nor ever would say that the games were won or lost by one guy on an entire team. Starting from the GM down to the water boys, there are too many people involved for a mistake or a bad game to be the responsibility of one guy.

HOWEVER. Teams win and teams lose, QBs make plays or don't make plays. When it was step up or go home, Favre failed to step up, choked or played poorly when Starr would have played his best game. That is the difference. It isn't the loss, it the failure to be clutch.

I give Favre credit for making fantastic come from behind plays. About 30% of his opportunities. I give him credit for having great seasons about 33% of his career. I don't excuse, deny or ignore the third of his career when he was average at best. I also refuse to ignore deny or excuse the third when he sucked. That isn't hate, that is just a lack of being sucked into the Favre hype.

The difference between Rodgers and Favre is when it came to the playoffs, Rodgers stepped up and played great. In fact, Rodgers has the highest post season rating ever.

Trying to say Rodgers is at fault for the playoff losses to make Favre look less bad is flat out wrong. 7 drops are not Rodgers fault.

AGAIN, I don't blame Favre for the losses, I blame him for choking, playing poorly, or throwing critical INTs in the playoffs when he should have stepped up. How can you compare him to Starr who had his best games when it was most important?

I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
PackerTraxx
12 years ago
Don Hutson, not even close.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago
Let us not forget that Starr also called all the plays. Other than Peyton Manning (I can't believe I mentioned him in this thread...argh!!!), no current era quarterback has had that responsibility, much less done so well with it.

Favre had physical skills that Starr never had. He could do things to complete passes, to keep games going, that Starr never could have done. Starr didn't have Favre's 40 speed or his elusiveness. He knew how to evade contact and was physically adept enough to avoid a lot of bad hits that would have, and did, put Starr out. Starr not only didn't have Favre's passing stats, he could never have had them because he wouldn't have been able to stay as healthy as often.

I do believe, however, that Starr, would have excelled in any era including today's.

It's no accident that the only player in recent NFL history who can be talked about in the same breath (sort of) as Starr with respect to championships, is Joe Montana. My guess is that Montana, were he transplanted back to the Lombardi era, would probably have done pretty well. (I do *not* think Favre or Manning or Brees or Brady would have.) But I do think Starr would have excelled under Walsh and Seifert.

Was Starr aided by all the Hall of Famers on his team? Sure. But anyone who thinks he couldn't have one more than one title under Wolf/Holmgren I think is mistaken. The only thing that would have stopped him from doing so would have been injuries.

He would never have been as durable as Favre. But would he have been durable enough? I think so. He survived the Deacon Joneses and the Carl Ellers and the Alan Pages and the Dick Butkuses and a whole lot of others who were just as tough, just as hardhitting as anyone today.

Again, IMO, Hutson is #1. Starr is #2.

Everyone else is vying for #3.

Until someone else "redefines the game" or approaches Montana/Starr numbers, it'll be a distant third.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Rockmolder
12 years ago

There is a difference between being a HOF player and the best ever. Reggie gets some love. Forrest won't compare to Hutson or Starr or Favre in that category.

Even if he did it is almost impossible to say, in general, an OL player was the greatest player on the team.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



That's very much true... But that's the problem. He might've been the best player on his team, but his position, coupled with the era he played in, makes it very hard to back such a statement up with facts, stats etc.

One of the biggest things he has going for him, in my mind, is that even Zeke Bratkowski looked like a HoFer quite a few times. Whichever running backs played behing that line, they where instantly propelled into stardom.

Of course, I'm not taking anything away from guys like Starr, Hornung, since they where pretty good themselves, but a guy like Tom Moore got it done behind that line before going on to put up averages above 3.0 ypc. Likewise for Earl Gros.

As for name an O-lineman the best player being impossible... It is very hard to back up your claims, I'll give you that. Moreso than most positions, you just can't make a solid claim outside of seeing the level of play. Sacks given up is one of the few you can really go by of the "official" stats.

I'll make the claim that Walter Jones was, for many years, by far the best player for the Seahawks. Even with Shaun Alexander running the ball. Same goes for Jonathan Ogden on Baltimore's offensive side. Maybe even the whole team, but that would be blasphemous to say with Lewis leading that defense.
Rockmolder
12 years ago

Welcome back, Rock! Where you been? Doubtless spending all that time with the girlfriend or other young people things.

Anyway, it's good to see you back.



Originally Posted by: Wade 



Thank you. Obviously, that's where most of my time goes. Just been busy between school and work on the side of that...

Euro Cup is over.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



...til I lost my job, freeing up some time to sproud my crap over PackersHome again.

Euro Cup was well awful, getting knocked out like that... Imagine the Packers going 1-7 next year, getting dropped out, then not being able to play for another 2 years again.
porky88
12 years ago

Let us not forget that Starr also called all the plays. Other than Peyton Manning (I can't believe I mentioned him in this thread...argh!!!), no current era quarterback has had that responsibility, much less done so well with it.

Originally Posted by: Wade 


Calling plays today is not the same as it was in the 60s. The playbook is denser now. I'd argue that a QB today probably knows more audibles (if given the responsibility) than a QB in the 60s did plays.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Luke Getsy been helping Packers defense. He's former OC Bears/Raiders and our old QB coach
beast (2-Jan) : Thanks dfosterf, I'm still kicking myself for last week, as I forgot to change to pick Vikings and Lions... after putting in a holding spot.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : First alternate: Elgton Jenkins Other alternates: Jordan Love, Kenny Clark, Keisean Nixon, Tucker Kraft, Josh Myers, Jaire Alexander
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Pro Bowl still a thing? Guess Packers have three. Jacobs, Gary, McKinney.
dfosterf (2-Jan) : It's a mine field with all the players sitting, etc
dfosterf (2-Jan) : There was quite a bit of "chalk" matchups this year it seemed, but not this week coming up
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : Or we got better and by we I mean everyone except me
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : We have about six that by percent would have won nearly any season. I guess 2024 was predictable 🤷
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You can check previous seasons. I quick did it and don't think anyone hit 70% before
dfosterf (2-Jan) : Hats off to the Beast
dfosterf (2-Jan) : I'm at 71.76% in pick 'em. 2nd place. Beast is at a flat 75% 9 games ahead. That 75% has got to be unprecedented this late in the season
beast (2-Jan) : I don't care deeply, just want some good entertaining games
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : BTW, not serious.
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : You don't care about it either!!!!
Zero2Cool (2-Jan) : NIL and Portal killed college, no one cares about it.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jan) : outside of Texas-Arizona St, it's been a snoozefest
beast (2-Jan) : I expect Georgia will change that tomorrow, but we'll have to wait and see. If they do, then only Big 10 and SEC are left.
beast (2-Jan) : So much for Conference Championship meaning something as 100% (so far) of the conference Champions lost their first playoff game.
Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Jaire had surgery, season over.
Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : I guess I need a new sig Pic. Boo
Mucky Tundra (1-Jan) : Eric Dickerson approves of this decision
beast (1-Jan) : Eagles are resting RB Saquon Barkley, so there is no chance he breaks the record despite being just 101 yards from it
Zero2Cool (1-Jan) : Patriots are waiving veteran pass rusher Yannick Ngakoue
beast (1-Jan) : Happy New Year's 🥳🎉
beast (31-Dec) : I want to them chant some songs for Daniel Whelan
beast (31-Dec) : Let's win one! Also, hopefully the Irish will stand with Daniel Whelan
Mucky Tundra (31-Dec) : After London and Brazil, I could go without an overseas game for a while
Zero2Cool (31-Dec) : Packers. Steelers. Ireland. 2025. Reports say.
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Matt Lafleur on if Jaire will play again this season. "Yeah I don't know... he's been dealing with swelling."
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : After the way they played for most of the game yesterday, I don't see how you can sit anyone for the whole game
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : I'd say play everyone. Going into playoffs at 7th seed on two game lose streak - yucky
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Do the Packers have any best players?
beast (30-Dec) : Play or Rest*
beast (30-Dec) : Should the Packers play or free their best players vs the Bears?
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Packers should be 3 - 2 in the Division. Bonkers being swept by both Lions and Vikings. yikes
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : All crazy stuff…and good point beast
beast (30-Dec) : Packers should be 0-5 in the division, can't say I saw that coming, even 1-4
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Sam Darnold 35 TD's ... another one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : Baker Mayfield, 39 TD's ... can't say I saw that one
Zero2Cool (30-Dec) : No matter who is playing as 7th, I think we want them to win. Get rid of 2nd seed haha
go.pack.go. (30-Dec) : That would be dhazer who was rooting for Minnesota
beast (30-Dec) : Well, Commanders are currently the 6th seed and Packers the 7th
beast (30-Dec) : Who was it in Chat, that wanted the Vikings to win (because Lions fans upset them) because Packers could not lose the 6th seed?
beast (30-Dec) : If Falcons win, Packers stay as the 6th seed and Falcons lead the NFCS, if they lose, Commanders 6th and Bucs take NFCS lead
beast (30-Dec) : Win or Loss, the NFCS is going down to week 18
Mucky Tundra (30-Dec) : if the Falcons win, how does that affect the overall NFC playoff picture? Does it mean that the NFC South comes down to week 18?
beast (30-Dec) : If Commanders win, the Packers drop to the 7th seed
beast (29-Dec) : Taylor still at it!
beast (29-Dec) : Colts get the ball and fumble turn over
packerfanoutwest (29-Dec) : Jets pull Aaron Rodgers for Tyrod Taylor
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
5m / GameDay Threads / Zero2Cool

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

1-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

31-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.