Porforis
13 years ago
Pick your poison:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/politics/immigration/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/15/obama-administration-to-offer-immunity-to-younger-immigrants/ 

Summary: The Obama Administration will stop deporting and issue work permits younger illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and have never committed a crime.

Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano said the change is needed to ensure enforcement resources are not expended on “low-priority cases” and are instead focused on people who “meet enforcement priorities.”

Personal Thoughts:
‎1. "Amnesty" to children of illegal immigrants: An idea not without its flaws but in my opinion, the best decision out of the available options (Including doing nothing)
2. Kind of scary that we live in a country where the government can knowingly assassinate an American citizen without a trial, and the executive branch can decide that they can simply issue directives that ignore current laws on the books. The ends do not justify the means, and everytime we trample over the constitution, it's that much easier the next time.
4PackGirl
13 years ago
i guess i want it both ways.
our country was founded by 'illegal immigrants', my grandfather's family had to endure prejudice because they were full blooded Italians aka WOP's (without papers), i could see the hurt in my grandpa's eyes whenever he talked about how others looked down on him based on nothing but his heritage. i guess i think everyone deserves a chance to follow the American dream.

what i don't fully understand is why people want to remain 'illegals'. i understand the tax benefits & such but other than that, why don't they become citizens legally? am i missing something? is it really difficult to become a citizen?
Porforis
13 years ago
It is very difficult to become a citizen, I guess what gets me is that rather than simply acknowledging that a majority of Americans voted for someone that disagrees with him on the other side of the isle, our president takes it upon himself to just say "Nope, if they don't want to push my immigration reform ideas I'm just going to decree that we stop enforcing the laws on the books". Regardless of if he has good intentions or not, this is a terrible, terrible precedent.
4PackGirl
13 years ago
ok so it's very difficult to become a citizen & yet people are screaming about illegal immigrants, how they're taking advantage of our country, our laws, taking our jobs, etc...

doesn't common sense say either make it a bit easier to become a citizen or put our troops side by side lined up on the border?? we can't have it both ways.

Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Whatever, all I ask is learn ENGLISH!
UserPostedImage
dhazer
13 years ago
It is not that hard to become a citizen, you can take the test and get 25 out of 100 wrong and still pass. The questions are not that hard, they have questions like what ocean is on the east coast of the US or what ocean is on the west coast. What day is Independence day?

The illegals don't want to become citizens because they don't have to pay taxes and they get all the benefits such as welfare and I have seen they have been treated better.

I say make a hunting season down on the southern border, call me racist all you want. But look what happens when an illegal gets busted here, they get food and a comfy cell and a ride home. Now in Mexico if we are in jail we get moldy bread and crappy water and hard to get out.

And as Zero said since when is spanish the national language. I am sure Cali or zombie can attest to this but I have seen schools out there that fly the mexican flag with the american flag. That is bullshit, and all of this mexican american or african american, those assholes can take that and shove it up there as. If they want to remember their heritage take your ass back to your country then. If your in america your an american.


I don't say I am an Irish american.


Obama = next hitler





Some test questions


1. What are the colors of our flag?

2. How many stars are there in our flag?

3. What color are the stars on our flag?

4. What do the stars on the flag mean?

5. How many stripes are there in the flag?

6. What color are the stripes?

7. What do the stripes on the flag mean?

8. How many states are there in the Union?

9. What is the 4th of July?

10. What is the date of Independence Day?


practice test citizenship 
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
porky88
13 years ago
Isn't Obama in favor of the dream act? Whether you think that's the ideal plan or not, that seems to be his position. What he announced today was not the dream act. This hyperpole reaction to anything a President or Governor (for that matter) makes is as damning to the country as anything politicians do. Frankly, politicians are the product of their environment. We create that environment with our reactions. The internet age hasn't helped. I do agree that the Presidential office is more powerful than what the founders intended. However, this isn't an Obama problem. The office he currently holds continues to receive more constitutional authority based on the decisions of courts. This dates well into the 20th century and both parties are guilty of it. You don't like that Obama has this authority? Blame the courts. They just keep giving the President more power.

Porforis
13 years ago

Isn't Obama in favor of the dream act? Whether you think that's the ideal plan or not, that seems to be his position. What he announced today was not the dream act. This hyperpole reaction to anything a President or Governor (for that matter) makes is as damning to the country as anything politicians do. Frankly, politicians are the product of their environment. We create that environment with our reactions. The internet age hasn't helped. I do agree that the Presidential office is more powerful than what the founders intended. However, this isn't an Obama problem. The office he currently holds continues to receive more constitutional authority based on the decisions of courts. This dates well into the 20th century and both parties are guilty of it. You don't like that Obama has this authority? Blame the courts. They just keep giving the President more power.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



The entire point is that he doesn't have the constitutional authority, and this isn't an isolated incident. The healthcare landscape is now a clusterfuck if any part of the healthcare bill gets repealed because it got rammed down our throats regardless of the Court's eventual rulings whatever they may be, and the industry needed to adapt. Now, tens to hundreds of thousands of people will be granted citizenship, contrary to established laws. If the court shoots this down, what are they going to do, deport everyone that took advantage of it? Either way, the President successfully bypasses congress and forces what he wants down America's throats.

The point is that when people decide that they are not bound by the constitution, it causes damage. There's room to whine about the courts, but not really on the subject of this administration and extraconstitutional actions, unless I'm missing something.
porky88
13 years ago

The entire point is that he doesn't have the constitutional authority, and this isn't an isolated incident. The healthcare landscape is now a clusterfuck if any part of the healthcare bill gets repealed because it got rammed down our throats regardless of the Court's eventual rulings whatever they may be, and the industry needed to adapt. Now, tens to hundreds of thousands of people will be granted citizenship, contrary to established laws. If the court shoots this down, what are they going to do, deport everyone that took advantage of it? Either way, the President successfully bypasses congress and forces what he wants down America's throats.

The point is that when people decide that they are not bound by the constitution, it causes damage. There's room to whine about the courts, but not really on the subject of this administration and extraconstitutional actions, unless I'm missing something.

Originally Posted by: Porforis 


Nobody rammed the health care bill down anyone’s throat. It was passed by a democratically elected congress and signed into law by the President of the United States. You may not agree with the law, but it wasn't rammed down our throats. They did what they thought was right. Being incompetent doesn't make you the next Hitler. It just makes you a bad President.

Bringing up health care raises an interesting point, though. If the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, the entire bill creates even more chaos. If you're worried about that, then vote straight Republican this November. They promise a complete repeal of the law. However, it'll take 60 votes in the senate to repeal it because somebody (Bernie Sanders?) will filibuster any attempt to repeal. The Republicans will need to pickup 12 seats in the Senate for that to happen. That's a stretch. As a result, President Romney (hypothetically) will have to use his executive powers to gut the rest of the bill. Romney is campaigning on this fact. He’ll be sidestepping congress to bypass much of the law. The very same thing Obama is doing right now because he can’t get congress to pass the dream act. Romney will have that power because the courts gave him it. The same goes for Obama, Bush, and so on. Every President since FDR (many before) has probably overstepped what the founders intended. Saying Obama is an isolated instance is simply not true.
Porforis
13 years ago

Nobody rammed the health care bill down anyone’s throat. It was passed by a democratically elected congress and signed into law by the President of the United States. You may not agree with the law, but it wasn't rammed down our throats. They did what they thought was right. Being incompetent doesn't make you the next Hitler. It just makes you a bad President.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



I should have chosen my words more carefully. When I said "rammed down our throat", I meant to say that the Democrats took advantage of a majority to pass a highly controversial bill that Americans were split pretty much 50-50 down the middle about, and still are. Now that we've had time to digest everything, a significant majority of Americans oppose the individual mandate. As I've been enjoying a few glasses of yummy rum, I'm not particularly eloquent at the moment so I cant sum everything up in a few words, but that's what I was going for.

Bringing up health care raises an interesting point, though. If the mandate is ruled unconstitutional, the entire bill creates even more chaos. If you're worried about that, then vote straight Republican this November. They promise a complete repeal of the law. However, it'll take 60 votes in the senate to repeal it because somebody (Bernie Sanders?) will filibuster any attempt to repeal. The Republicans will need to pickup 12 seats in the Senate for that to happen. That's a stretch. As a result, President Romney (hypothetically) will have to use his executive powers to gut the rest of the bill. Romney is campaigning on this fact. He’ll be sidestepping congress to bypass much of the law. The very same thing Obama is doing right now because he can’t get congress to pass the dream act. Romney will have that power because the courts gave him it. The same goes for Obama, Bush, and so on. Every President since FDR (many before) has probably overstepped what the founders intended. Saying Obama is an isolated instance is simply not true.

Originally Posted by: porky88 



Overall, this is why I believe that when you're talking about major legislation, there should either be a very immediate need for said legislation and/or a decent majority of public approval. When you make sweeping changes like the healthcare bill and this latest issue, if facts come out later or public opinion otherwise swings against the legislation, we're stuck with the consequences. That's not to say that healthcare and health coverage aren't big issues in our country (more for some than others), but I believe government should be more careful when pushing such changes. This is about as not-careful as you can get, bypassing the legislature altogether on an issue americans are very much divided on. The great unifier my ass.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.