Cut Driver for Moss?· Page 2

shield4life
Veteran Member

12 years ago

Sure because when we missed out on Moss and the Patriots got him they won the SB ... oh wait ... The reason we lost against the Giants was Favre throwing his hail int mary & Burress destroying Harris!

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: shield4life

It didn't help that Grant fumbled twice in the first half or that Bush didn't "just fall on" that fumble.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

dhazer
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#13

Ha! it's not what I say, it's what everyone else said! so 😛

Let's also remember, it was the Raiders who jumped on the Patriots offer without giving the Packers a chance to match the pick or improve it. The Patriots said take it or leave it.

I love re-hashing old debates during the off season. We should light up the Brett Favre section too! Lots of good ones up in there! :)

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

The Nfl halready has a Favre session going on, its called the Manning epic. Its a replay of Favre just with different players in the game.

As far as the topic I say hell no, we already have one big mouth on the offense we don't need another one. Plus we need to get Cobb on the field more as I see him jumping up to the #3 wr this year. We will keep DD just for the locker room presence and how he teaches the young receivers.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#14

We will keep DD just for the locker room presence and how he teaches the young receivers.

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Teaching is the role of coaches, who as a rule are paid significantly less than players. If they are retaining Driver purely for his "locker room presence" (whatever that means, sounds like mumbo-jumbo to me), it damn well better be at a drastically reduced salary.

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#15

Driver has clearly lost a few steps. He's no longer the player he was in 2010, and he'll be worse in 2012.

That said, the last image I have of Randy Moss is Brett Favre throwing a perfect TD pass to a point only Moss could get it to win a Vikings game and Moss not even jumping up because he didn't feel like it.

I don't want to see Moss anywhere near a Packers uniform. He's amongst my least favorite players in the NFL.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

porky88
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#16

I know I've been harping on it all month, but cutting Driver is about expanding Randall Cobb's role in the offense. The top four receivers should be Cobb, Jennings, Jones, and Nelson. Frankly, I’d like to see Cobb in the slot on more three-wide sets. Right now, they alternate Driver and Jones. They shouldn’t alternate next year. Cobb should be their No. 3 receiver.

http://www.row12.com/

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: porky88

I suspect he'll beat out Jordy for #2.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#18

I suspect he'll beat out Jordy for #2.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

not hardly pilgrim.

El3ment12
Registered

12 years ago

#19

NOO!! Don't cut Driver. Can we just have one player that stays in GB his whole career? This is depressing to me that everyone is just cool with cutting him. He can still play. Hell, he was on of the only ones who showed up in the playoff game this year.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

12 years ago

#20

Originally Posted by: El3ment380

Terrance Murphy, Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila and Jeremy Thompson are a few off the top of my head that should make this less depressing for you. Roster size and injuries make no room for sentimental carry overs. I say, if Donald Driver proves he can contribute as one of the top 5 WR on the team, he should be kept. Driver is very good in the slot even at his age. I don't think it will stunt Randall Cobb like some muse about. It typically takes 3 seasons for a WR to adjust and make themselves at home in the NFL.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (now) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (9m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (20m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS