They are the same people who do not deserve the privileges and benefits of living in a free society. The price of liberty is the acceptance of a certain degree of risk and even danger. That's the way it is supposed to be.
If one of those snipers had gotten excited and misinterpreted a threat (which we all know never happens, right?), and an innocent child had ended up dead, would that have been an acceptable price to pay in the name of warding off some nebulous, ill-defined threat of terrorism?
Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel