Rodgers MVP?· Page 6 · PACKERSHOME

RaiderPride
Senior Member

13 years ago

Seriously, sending Brees back out with a 3 TD lead with 11 minutes left to go and taking shots down the field? Enjoy your meaningless record.

Originally Posted by: Porforis

Meaningless to who? To you Porforis?

There were over 73,000 fans at the game that would disagree with your opinion. There were thousands of good fans there who probably were given a ticket to this game as a Christmas gift, people who were hoping they could say "I was there with my son, and we saw the 29 year old passing yardage record broken."

I say Great for the Saints to make it happen tonight, for the fans who were there.

I say GREAT for Drew who is a class act, and a fine man with a fine reputation and a fine family.

I find nothing meaningless about Drew's accomplishment at all.

But that is just me... I am not part of the fucked up society who has to put down incredible efforts and achievements at the highest level of sports or any other endevor.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

nerdmann
Premier Member

13 years ago

#52

Micheal Rodney of Packer Update has a great twitter feed:

Any passing record achieved by a dome QB should have an asterisk next to it. Just not the same when you play in a controlled environment.

12's stats if he played 3/4 of his games in domes: 75% completion percentage, 5,300 yards and 55 TDs.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#53

While I wouldn't express it as strongly as he did, I tend to agree with RaiderPride here. Had Rodgers not been benched three times this year, he could easily have broken the TD-pass record, which I think is a lot more meaningful than the yardage record. Although it's more important to have him healthy rolling into the playoffs, it would have been fun and exciting to see our quarterback destroy a record like that without throwing 23 touchdowns to one receiver.

I feel a little sorry for all the fans who will have spent hundreds of bucks to watch the game against the Lions, only to have to sit through two or three quarters of scrubs probably getting their asses handed to them by the Lions' starters, instead of watching this offense potentially smashing through a couple of league records. I know I personally would feel ripped off, which is why I wouldn't buy tickets to a game like that.

RaiderPride
Senior Member

13 years ago

#54

While I wouldn't express it as strongly as he did, I tend to agree with RaiderPride here.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

For the record.. - I do not consider Porforis part of that society, Porforis only said it was meaningless and I disagree with that. The strongly worded last paragraph I was referring to the jack asses in the bar who were calling him a loser, pussy, and shit for breath dome player.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#55

I feel a little sorry for all the fans who will have spent hundreds of bucks to watch the game against the Lions, only to have to sit through two or three quarters of scrubs probably getting their asses handed to them by the Lions' starters, instead of watching this offense potentially smashing through a couple of league records. I know I personally would feel ripped off, which is why I wouldn't buy tickets to a game like that.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

It's kind of how I feel about Formo and VR lately. They don't even have any weak ass shit for me anymore. I'm getting rather depressed in this forum. Feed me something dumbasses.

As for Brees, he doesn't bother me, like Crybaby Payton and Pretty Boy Tom do. I think Nawlins probably could have had some class and yanked him out instead of greasing stats. That doesn't do much for me at all.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#56

The difference is I think the Lions match up pretty well with the Packers and that if this game mattered to the Packers, the starter would probably have to stay in the whole game in order to seal the deal. Unlike some of the quarterbacks they have faced lately, Stafford has proven he can throw 4-5 touchdowns in a game.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

13 years ago

#57

Stats of the Week No. 2: Aaron Rodgers has 39 more touchdown passes than interceptions -- a greater figure than the total number of touchdown passes by any NFL quarterback other than Drew Brees.

http://espn.go.com/espn/page2/story/_/id/7390531/tmq-unveils-2011-all-unwanted-all-pro-teams

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#58

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

I think the TD record is more important too, but isn't the Yards record the last Marino record to fall? Poor guy. Breaks every single passing record and never wins a SB only to see every record fall one by one while he gets fat then sells diet aids.

And I agree. We'll lose to the Lions because their 1st stringers should be able to beat our 2nd stringers.

Now back to the original topic, Brees has a shot for the MVP still because the NFL MVP method is designed by crack smokin' hippies. Instead of the best player of the year (like how it's done in baseball and how it SHOULD be done), the award goes to the most meaningful dude to his team. Whatever that means.

So despite 🇦🇷 owning pretty much every other player in the NFL, who means more to the team - Aaron, Drew, or Tom Brady? Now if that isn't football fan mental masturbation, I don't know what is.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Rios39
Member

13 years ago

#59

Defensively, if the packers play the saints, we can't possibly try to match Hawk up with those TE's and RB's. Too bad we don't really have a cover LB anymore. We may need to use Woodson on Jimmy Graham.

Graham is a beast but he's allowed to run through defenses a little more than Finley, leaving him pretty wide open during a lot of plays. Which is due to all the other weapons.

blank

kobe16
Registered

13 years ago

#60

Rodgers better win this award. In all honesty, if Rodgers played every home game in a dome then that record would have been his like 2 weeks ago.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (5m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (17m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS