Rodgers didn't look as accurate as usual for most of the game today.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 

I don't think it was Aaron Rodgers fault he had 6 (i think) passes dropped. I put more on the receivers than Aaron Rodgers, because his passes looked fine.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

right right. We're obviously all spoiled by how insanely accurate he is, and any thing i say is going to be nitpicking, but it seemed he was throwing more low balls, and balls that were slightly off than usual. Obviously it's a great problem to have when the worst game all season includes a 106 rating, 4 touchdowns and a ton of yards.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 

right right. We're obviously all spoiled by how insanely accurate he is, and any thing i say is going to be nitpicking, but it seemed he was throwing more low balls, and balls that were slightly off than usual. Obviously it's a great problem to have when the worst game all season includes a 106 rating, 4 touchdowns and a ton of yards.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 

Aaron Rodgers, Packers: The efficiency he's displaying is jaw-dropping. Rodgers is completing 70.6 percent of his passes, has thrown for multiple touchdowns in every game and can tie the league record for consecutive games with at least two scoring passes if he accomplishes the feat Sunday against Oakland.

Efficiency? He has thrown for 37 touchdowns while being picked off just five times. A perfect passer rating for a game is 158.3; Rodgers' mark is 125.3 for the season. No wonder Green Bay has scored TDs on an NFL-best 34.6 percent of its possessions and, at 12-0, is a legitimate threat to become just the second team to go undefeated en route to a Super Bowl win.


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/jim_trotter/12/07/quarterback.ratings/index.html#ixzz1g4tpjA44 

Jim Trotter wrote: