What's wrong with Gay marriage?· Page 2

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

Well said.

As for your last paragraph, gay males make more money than straight males. That's why they have nice shit.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

You two are boneheads. The difference is that being born gay gives you no choice at all; therefore, you are being discriminated against. Just like being born black, hispanic, asian, white - you had no choice. Whereas a learned behavior, you had a choice in the matter; and the choice you made had consequences. In most states you can't get married so you'll have to get off your ass and fight for your rights. Or you can freeload in the states where the ground work has been laid.

The reason gay men have nice shit is that first of all they don't have a scrapbooking spouse, unless one of them is really gay; and of course they are not hanging around bars with the boys drinking like stupid asses all sharing one brain.

I reiterate - Zero and Zombie are boneheads - it must be Z thing.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Learned behavior? Are you serious with this? Falling in love with someone of the same sex is a "learned behavior"?? And you call me a bonehead?

So much for "the heart wants what the heart wants" EXCEPT if the heart wants the same sex!!!

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Well I love you, but I don't want to suck your cock or marry you! And yes, you're still a bonehead, that I would like take behind the woodshed and beat mercilessly almost on a daily basis.

A lot of lesbians became that way becuase they were abused in some fashion. That is learned behavior (they choose to be lesbians). Are we clear, can I explain it any more simply than that, Dumbass?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Females whom were abused in some fashion are far more likely to be promiscuous with men than flipping to the same team. Being abused is not a learned behavior, it's a tragic unfortunate event in ones life.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

What part of gay males make more money than straight males don't you understand? Hmm...

OK, let me explain it another way. Studies have shown that gay males have higher salaries than straight males.

Or I could phrase it another way. Gay males earn more yearly income than straight males.

Or maybe this way. Gay males have larger paychecks than straight males.

Hope one of those you understood. It has nothing to do with a spouse spending all of their money.

And no, Zero & I get it. It's a free country. Whether or not you're born gay or if it's a choice, it shouldn't matter.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Wade
Veteran Member

13 years ago

#16

My feeling is that God gave us free will. That means we ought to be free to choose whatever hell we want.

I also believe that God cares far less about what we do with our dangly bits (or don't do with them) than we do.

I think the pursuit of gay sex and gay relationships can be a form of idolatry (and hence sinful), but the same is true of hetero sex and hetero relationships. Much of what people label "love"is I expect sinful in God's eyes. But not because of the mechanics used, but because of the state of mind reflected.

I also think there's no way I can or should be judging peoples' state of mind just because they happen to profess their homosexuality, any more than I should be judging peoples' state of mind because they admit to liking redheads or women with small breasts.

And as an anarchist, I see no reason why the state needs to be involved at all in deciding who gets married and who doesn't.

I understand why we might need to have fishing or hunting licenses (namely to prevent the tragedy of the commons). I fail to understand why we need to have marriage licenses if the people involved are "adult" and consenting.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#17

It's a free country. Whether or not you're born gay or if it's a choice, it shouldn't matter.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Gay folks die for our "freedom", yet they are not afforded the opportunity to marry? I don't understand that part either, similarly to how black folks couldn't vote or exercise the freedoms the white folks could, yet they were expected to go to war an die for freedoms they could not have?

Pack93z
Select Member

13 years ago

#18

To me.. the concept of not allowing them to join in the legal definition of marriage is absurd.

The church and afterlife can have there say independently from the legalities of this country..

The hypocrisy of any government that will label "Under God" from the pledge of Allegiance as nothing more than "ceremonial and patriotic nature", cannot justifiably cite any religious connotations to gay marriage. You can't have it both ways.

We have wasted probably billions of dollars in this country on this topic, that has really no reason to be an issue for the government to rule upon.

It is not our fight as a union to decide.. two adults should be able to form a marriage freely if both consent.. regardless of sex, race or religion.

But pressure from religious voters sways the self serving politician in seeking re-election.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#19

And no, Zero & I get it. It's a free country. Whether or not you're born gay or if it's a choice, it shouldn't matter.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

No, Zero and Zombie incredibly boneheaded, but because you are also bullheaded - I give up trying to educate you. If you think you live in a free country than that is all the proof I need to call you a Dumbass.

But remember - you're still my boy. We'll call you Fez.

DakotaT
Select Member

13 years ago

#20

But pressure from self righteous religious voters sways the self serving politician in seeking re-election.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

I thought you needed a few more adjectives.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (1h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (9h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (14h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (16h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS