Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Damn! Foiled! My fingers were crossed when I posted it, so the contract is nullified.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



No fucker, I want my god damn mother fucking cookie!!!

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

No fucker, I want my god damn mother fucking cookie!!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



time out corner for you for using naughty words.
UserPostedImage
Silentio
13 years ago

Who's better?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Why do you even need to ask me this? Clearly I think Grant is a better pass blocker than Starks after one game. I'm not sitting at practice so I don't have more info than anyone else and I'm not James Starks' girlfriend, so I can't ask him. Reading comprehension, anyone?
blank
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Find anyone on here that thinks Grant will get 1,200 yards this season and I'll bake you a cookie and send it to you. We have known for some time that Grant and Starks would be splitting time. People naturally came to Grant's defense when the topic of cutting him was introduced.

I will admit I am concerned about Grant's production through the lens that he is typically a guy who gets better as the carries increase. We have seen it many times before. Now, as far as last night he ran the ball well -- I don't know how anyone can dispute that. He converted in obvious running situations, and he showed a nice burst.

All these "who is better" questions are completely arbitrary in my opinion. Is Jordy better than Driver? Well, it doesn't really freaking matter if a) both are on the field at the same time b) both still make plays.

It's a similar situation with Grant/Starks. Number one, there is depth there. If one guy goes down, we'll be in good shape either way. Neither guy needs to rush for 1,200 yards to prove their value to the team, you facile buffoon (don't take this to heart -- I mean it in jest). The other obvious advantage of having both is being able to stay fresh at the position.

Cobb scored a TD last night, and he's #5 on the depth chart. That's a luxury. That's depth and talent on your roster. Grant and Starks helps us (not a claim you deny, I know). Can we just move on and be happy with these guys?

Originally Posted by: evad04 



Wonderful post.

The topic headline itself is absurd. Why do we care? They're both on the same freaking team. If Starks has a spectacular year, awesome. If Grant has a spectacular year, awesome. What really matters is that at least one of them is 100% throughout the Playoffs.

Now, a more interesting topic - Aaron Rodgers v Drew Brees as best QB in the NFL today.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Wonderful post.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 

I disagree. I did as he asked (with your post actually) and I'm being screwed out of my cookie. I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!!!

UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

I disagree. I did as he asked (with your post actually) and I'm being screwed out of my cookie. I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore!!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



This reminds me of a joke.

A guy goes into the Doctor's office and complains about a tapeworm. So on the first visit, the Doctor sticks an apple up his ass, then a cookie. Then tells him to come back tomorrow.

The next day, the Doctor sticks an apple up his ass, then a cookie. Then tells him to come back tomorrow.

The next day, the Doctor sticks an apple up his ass, then a cookie. Then tells him to come back tomorrow.

The next day, the Doctor sticks an apple up his ass, then a cookie. Then tells him to come back tomorrow.

Then the next day, the Doctor sticks an apple up his ass. Then waits. The tapeworm pops out and says "where's my cookie?" Then the Doctor whacks the tapeworm with a hammer.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
DakotaT
13 years ago




It's a similar situation with Grant/Starks. Number one, there is depth there. If one guy goes down, we'll be in good shape either way. Neither guy needs to rush for 1,200 yards to prove their value to the team, you facile buffoon (don't take this to heart -- I mean it in jest). The other obvious advantage of having both is being able to stay fresh at the position.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



OK, but just so you realize that about 95% of what I do in here is to stir the pot. The other 5% is when I call Formo, VR, Zero, and Zombie dumbasses. Now that shit you can take to the bank.



UserPostedImage
Yerko
13 years ago
I agree with evad here. Why does everything always have to be a this-or-that situation instead of this-AND-that situation when we are referring to players of the same team? Both Grant and Starks bring a different running style to the game.

Grant
-Puts his head down and buries into the backs of linemen, sometimes finds the gap and goes.
-Fights for yards, but easier to take down.
-Explosive after finding the open lane.
-Better pass protection.

Starks
-Seems to find the lane quicker and hits it.
-Fights for extra yards and is tough to take down with just one tackler.
-Explosive at start of run to finish.
-Still a terrible pass protector.

One thing I noticed last night was Grant did hesitate a few times trying to find the open lane (if there was one), but he still managed to gain some yards. Starks managed to find the running lanes a lot quicker and if he didn't have one, he made one and gained yards.

Packers are lucky to have two good running backs (maybe 3 when we finally see Alex Green play).
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
13 years ago
When has Grant ever demonstrated proficiency at pass pro? When they tried everyone else at it except him this summer?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago

Then the Doctor whacks the tapeworm with a hammer.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 


Too bad hitting a tapeworm with a hammer wouldn't actually kill it. :-"
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (21h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (21h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (21h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (21h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (23h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10h / Around The NFL / beast

20h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.