13 years ago

Doesn't make sense to keep a player who doesn't fit your system as well as a player you have signed already. That's not a mistake, that's intelligence.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Who doesn't fit the system, Gurley? If so, how doesn't he fit? They kept him around on the PS. And what mistake are you referring to? The quote you responded to doesn't mention a mistake. Wrong quote, maybe? Not sure what you're trying to say.😕
13 years ago

is it possible that some people's assessment of Gurley was inflated if he cleared waivers? I will admit that I expected him to get picked up by someone else. But I'd also contend I felt that way mostly because many have talked up his abilities. I'm also happy that he is on the PS and am in no way looking to say "I told you so!" That wouldn't make any sense, either, because the only thing I've felt strongly about with regard to Gurley was that Donald Driver is a better option.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



It's definitely a possibility that I and others are overrating Gurley. We only see so much of any of these guys. The coaches see much more, and have done a great job with talent, so I'm not trying to claim I know better than they do. Maybe Gurley is just too raw right now. Maybe he looks like shit on routes sometimes that we don't even notice because the ball goes elsewhere. Who knows.

What I'm going off is how he has looked as an undrafted rookie without the benefit of a real offseason. He blocked 5 punts in TC, and got pretty close to blocking punts twice at Indy. He also was part of Harrell's game winning drive that day, and looked pretty good vs. KC, especially on that deep sideline catch where he didn't get his toes in. It was an impressive catch, toes out or not. He lead the team in catches this preseason with 9. Not too shabby for a UDFA on a team that had 10 WRs in TC. That, and he has rare, near Plaxico Burress size. If he continues to develop, he could be a good one. He has already been pretty damn productive.

Anyway, I'm glad to see him on the PS, and will still be hoping that he makes the roster later in the year. Maybe he ends up being a flash in the pan, or just another Ruvell or Joey Haynos (another guy who I really wanted to see make the team a few years back), but I'll be rooting for him to be more than that, because he looks like he could be.

Oh, and one more time, just for good measure- Best of luck to Mr. Driver too. I'd love to see him beat the odds and become only the second WR to play in the NFL after the age of 40.
Pack93z
13 years ago



Oh, and one more time, just for good measure- Best of luck to Mr. Driver too. I'd love to see him beat the odds and become only the second WR to play in the NFL after the age of 40.

Originally Posted by: get_louder_at_lambeau 



He has softened his stance late in the preseason this year about that.. I think he can see the gap between his play and the young bucks to know that it is just a matter of time before father time tilts the playing field against him.

You can't play this young mans game forever.. no matter how hard you push your body there is a limit to what you can stave off and what you can't. It has been played out many times before at the skill positions..

And I think Driver knows this.. just as Charles Woodson will soon know it as well.. albeit he can maybe extend his career a bit longer with the opportunity to move to a dime back and playing more zone coverage.. but even then that window will shrink.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
13 years ago

He has softened his stance late in the preseason this year about that.. I think he can see the gap between his play and the young bucks to know that it is just a matter of time before father time tilts the playing field against him.

You can't play this young mans game forever.. no matter how hard you push your body there is a limit to what you can stave off and what you can't. It has been played out many times before at the skill positions..

And I think Driver knows this.. just as Charles Woodson will soon know it as well.. albeit he can maybe extend his career a bit longer with the opportunity to move to a dime back and playing more zone coverage.. but even then that window will shrink.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



And just think- Woodson is only 34 right now. He'll turn 35 a month from today. Driver will turn 37 right before the Super Bowl. He has almost two years on Woodson, and Woodson is old. Hopefully they both find the fountain of youth this year and tear it up.
nerdmann
13 years ago

He has softened his stance late in the preseason this year about that.. I think he can see the gap between his play and the young bucks to know that it is just a matter of time before father time tilts the playing field against him.

You can't play this young mans game forever.. no matter how hard you push your body there is a limit to what you can stave off and what you can't. It has been played out many times before at the skill positions..

And I think Driver knows this.. just as Charles Woodson will soon know it as well.. albeit he can maybe extend his career a bit longer with the opportunity to move to a dime back and playing more zone coverage.. but even then that window will shrink.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 




Albeit?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
DakotaT
13 years ago

And just think- Woodson is only 34 right now. He'll turn 35 a month from today. Driver will turn 37 right before the Super Bowl. He has almost two years on Woodson, and Woodson is old. Hopefully they both find the fountain of youth this year and tear it up.

Originally Posted by: get_louder_at_lambeau 




Well I'm 42 and my body feels like a bucket of dung somedays. So much for the fountain of youth. To their credit, they both continue to play at a high level. But no doubt, they are on borrowed time now and all we get from them from here on out is gravy.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Well I'm 42 and my body feels like a bucket of dung somedays.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

And looks like it too, which I doubt can be said for them. :)

UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

Albeit?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yep.. al·be·it

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/albeit 

Definition of ALBEIT
: conceding the fact that : even though : although



Woodson still can line up outside and stick with almost any receiver in the league in press at this point.. his versatility is still one of his greatest assets along with his overall experience, knowledge and god given talent.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (3m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (49m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (49m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (49m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (57m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (57m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.