wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Back in the day, Ted Thompson had to get rid of all the Favre loyalists. There were guys on the team who would go along with Favre changing the plays and whatnot, trying to run the team himself. Because of this, and because of the Favre fiasco, there was talk that Ted Thompson was disrespecting veterans. He was not doing so, imo. What he was doing was attempting to re-establish control of the team by getting rid of guys who weren't getting with the program.
So the Packers have had to do some PR as a result. Last year they asked Tauscher to stick around with the team, even after his injury. They kept Al Harris around until the last possible moment. They even gave Harris a ring.
The thing with Nick Barnett might be a little different, as I suspect he might have been one of the Favre loyalists from back in the day. The last one hanging around. Although you might add DD into that group as well.
Fact is, imo, they can't get rid of DD for his reason. They will keep him on the team, but will give him a pitch count to prevent injury. They want to keep him healthy so he will last the season. Hopefully as a result of this, the Packers will not lose an up and coming talent who would have as much or more to offer this year, plus another 10 years down the road. But Ted Thompson has shown ability to consistently draft talented young WRs, and being that there are not alot of holes on this team, should be able to target one in the upcoming draft.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Interesting. I don't agree with Ted feeling the need to do anything based on team politics but I somehow like your post. I applaud you.

In your post you showed how Ted works both ways. He got rid of players he has issues with. He kept veterans who contributed to the team. Tauscher was injured mid season. No reason to cut him mid year. But Ted didn't feel obligated to bring him to the White House either.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago

Which is why it boggles my fricken mind why it is such a personal issue to some of you when people such as Nerdmann, Dr. Death, and I make these radical, unpopular suggestions.

It makes the day go faster I guess.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 




We don't take it personal. We just feel you are full of crap at times and point it out. You don't hesitate to do the same thing bucko.

Driver staying on board has little to do with "The Record"*. I think it is somewhat tainted by how long it took him and how much more of a passing game it is these days. If Driver is gone in 2012, fine. If he falls off the production table this year. Fine. I will say you were right and I was wrong. I think he is a better player than West or Girlie. They may develop into something special and they may be nothing more than a 4-5th receiver. But there will be more like them waiting to get their chance.

I think last year was an aberration due to injuries. You say it is because he is old. You also claim that people on this site want to keep DD for sentimental reasons which makes you full of it. It has been pointed out to you many times by many members why they think he belongs. You ignore their reasons and continue to tout your own ideas. You are entitled to do so. But we can still feel you are full of it and say so. I say he stays because Ted/Mike feels he is a better player and not for sentiment.
UserPostedImage
13 years ago
I'm not sure why more than one on this thread have said that Driver is playing better this preseason than he did last season. He had two drops in the last game alone. That's NOT OK. An abberation? Maybe. But we can't just pretend it didn't happen and give him a gold star for great play.

Now he's about to miss this next game for an ankle injection from his Super Bowl injury 6 months ago. That's not a great sign either. Maybe it's minor stuff. Maybe it's a lingering injury that will limit his production this year or keep him out of games. It's certainly not a good sign.

He's due about $5 mil this year including roster and workout bonuses, which is a lot for a guy who is anywhere from the #2 to #4 WR, and will be 37 years old before the Super Bowl is played.

So, there are some of the negatives for the old man. I think his positives have been covered fairly well, so I'll play devil's advocate.

Driver peaked statistically in 2006, with 92 catches for 1295 yards and 8 TDs. The next three years were all about equal to each other, but a clear step below his 2006 production. Then last year he only had 51 catches, 565 yards, and 4 TDs, with a team high 8 drops in the regular season.

Would a similar year to last year be worthy of $5 mil? I think it clearly wouldn't be, especially when we have 4 younger guys capable of similar or better production on the depth chart. What if last year wasn't due to age and related injuries, but a fluke injury or two, and he rebounds healthy this year? Then he'd be worth it, but his two drops against Indy and sitting out this next game for treatment of a 6 month old injury makes that sound unlikely, especially when he turns 37 this postseason. Most WRs are already retired by his age, even many of the great ones.

So, what's the possible upside of cutting the old man? A savings of about $4.5 mil that could be devoted to one of our younger players, and a roster spot.

We could keep Gurley, who blocked 5 punts in Training Camp. That's unheard of, and is a game changing play if he can do it once or twice in the regular season. He's also our tallest WR, at 6'4", and has the longest wingspan of any WR to come out this year, with only #6 overall pick Julio Jones coming anywhere close to matching his reach. Reports are that he's starting to put it together as a WR. If he can, they can throw him out there against teams with undersized CBs, and throw him some jump balls that he can use his height and wingspan to bring down. According to Tyler Dunne of JSO, Gurley NEVER DROPPED A PASS in college. Driver dropped TWO in the first half at Indy last week.

Now, let me clarify that I don't think Gurley > Driver. I think that Gurley + $4.5 mil might be > Driver. I think that Jennings, Driver, Nelson, Jones, Cobb might not be $4.5 mil better than Jennings, Nelson, Jones, Cobb, Gurley. Our special teams would be better with Gurley kept over Driver, the team would have more cap space and money, and the only significant dropoff at WR would be at the #5 WR spot. Is a better #5 WR spot worth $4.5 mil and lesser special teams? I'm leaning towards no, if you can't tell. We'll see how Gurley does tonight.

All that said, Donald Driver is one of the best Packers in history, and I wish him nothing but luck. If the Packers decide he's worth keeping, I won't bitch.
nerdmann
13 years ago
Ha ha, I'm not gonna bitch either. This is the best type of problem to have. THANKS TT!
One more thing about Gurley is that he ran a 4.5, which is what Greg Jennings ran. He's 6'4" about 220lbs.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Greg C.
13 years ago
You mention three times that Driver dropped two passes in the Indy game. I watched the game twice and counted only one drop. It was an obvious one. Do you remember what the other drop looked like?
blank
13 years ago

You mention three times that Driver dropped two passes in the Indy game. I watched the game twice and counted only one drop. It was an obvious one. Do you remember what the other drop looked like?

Originally Posted by: Greg C. 




There was one really obvious one, as you said, and the other one was slightly behind him, but one he should have caught, if I remember correctly. But I might not.

Here's JSO's Pete Dougherty's mention of it-

Though starting receiver Donald Driver caught three passes for 38 yards, he also dropped two perfectly thrown passes, including one on second down of a three-and-out series in the second quarter.



http://packersnews.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20110826/PKR01/110826170/Green-Bay-Packers-Jermichael-Finley-quickly-getting-his-game-back?odyssey=mod |mostview
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
get louder,
You are over playing the injury just a bit. It is common for Mike to be a little over protective of the vets in all the preseason especially game 4.
UserPostedImage
13 years ago

get louder,
You are over playing the injury just a bit. It is common for Mike to be a little over protective of the vets in all the preseason especially game 4.

Originally Posted by: wpr 




You might be 100% right on that. We can't know for sure.

Hey Greg C-

Just rewatched the 1st quarter. Drop #1 is at 1:30 in the first, on 1st and 10. Is that the one you missed?
Greg C.
13 years ago

You might be 100% right on that. We can't know for sure.

Hey Greg C-

Just rewatched the 1st quarter. Drop #1 is at 1:30 in the first, on 1st and 10. Is that the one you missed?

Originally Posted by: get_louder_at_lambeau 



Was that the obvious one? Wide open over the middle?
blank
mi_keys
13 years ago

Back in the day, Ted Thompson had to get rid of all the Favre loyalists. There were guys on the team who would go along with Favre changing the plays and whatnot, trying to run the team himself. Because of this, and because of the Favre fiasco, there was talk that Ted Thompson was disrespecting veterans. He was not doing so, imo. What he was doing was attempting to re-establish control of the team by getting rid of guys who weren't getting with the program.
So the Packers have had to do some PR as a result. Last year they asked Tauscher to stick around with the team, even after his injury. They kept Al Harris around until the last possible moment. They even gave Harris a ring.
The thing with Nick Barnett might be a little different, as I suspect he might have been one of the Favre loyalists from back in the day. The last one hanging around. Although you might add DD into that group as well.
Fact is, imo, they can't get rid of DD for his reason. They will keep him on the team, but will give him a pitch count to prevent injury. They want to keep him healthy so he will last the season. Hopefully as a result of this, the Packers will not lose an up and coming talent who would have as much or more to offer this year, plus another 10 years down the road. But Ted Thompson has shown ability to consistently draft talented young WRs, and being that there are not alot of holes on this team, should be able to target one in the upcoming draft.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



TT's PR was winning the Super Bowl. He doesn't need PR. I'd argue their indifference towards the politics of Super Bowl pictures and White House trips shows just how little they care about that stuff.

Interesting thought, mind you.

Born and bred a cheesehead
Fan Shout
TheKanataThrilla (2m) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (3m) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (50m) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (51m) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
dfosterf (3h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol
wpr (3h) : Today is finally here.
dfosterf (4h) : I should have put it in quotes
dfosterf (4h) : It is the title of a you tube video.
dfosterf (4h) : I'm not assuming anything
beast (10h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?
dfosterf (15h) : Mackelvie
dfosterf (15h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
dfosterf (15h) : Youtube
Zero2Cool (20h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
dfosterf (22h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

3h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.