wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

The amount of respect on the field that Lofton garnered was impressive.. in a day where the rules were more balanced between the offense and defense.

In Hutson's day.. the rules were tilted towards the defense in the passing game.. DB's were afforded a ton of contact.


This isn't taking anything away from Driver.. but the era in which he has played has benefited him.

That is not to say that Donald wouldn't not have excelled in different era's, he is a physical receiver and doesn't shy away from the middle of the field, it just that the league as tilted the advantage towards the passing game.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 




I can not imagine what Hutson would have done in a league with a 16 game season, additional teams and the rules set up the way they are now. It would have been amazing to watch him play.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

I can not imagine what Hutson would have done in a league with a 16 game season, additional teams and the rules set up the way they are now. It would have been amazing to watch him play.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Rice may or may not have surpassed Hutson's records.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Rice may or may not have surpassed Hutson's records.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




exactly. hard to say. but fun to speculate. I say NEVER!!!
UserPostedImage
pack_in_black
13 years ago

Let's not forget that Lofton had some of his good years not as a Packer. The Bills resurrected his career after he wasted two years on the Raiders.

So if anyone got the shaft, it's Hutson. He played in a league with less games and very little passing.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




To be fair, in today's league, you can't have an impact in a championship game after staying out all night the night before. 🤣

The guys on the field are freaks of nature these days, and I think the heroes of yesteryear, as awesome as I still find them, would for the most part be average to good in today's game.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to Pack93z for the sig!
Cheesey
13 years ago
Today's players are much bigger then those from the past. In the "old days" there were almost NO players that weighed over 300 pounds, Now, they are on every team. And the size and strength of the WR's is amazing. If you took a man from the 1930's and threw him into a game today, i doubt he would fare well. Also, to take a WR of today and throw them into a 1930's team, and he's probably be on IR after one game, as they could just about take your head off with no penalty.

What i'm trying to say is, if DD gets the record, he earned it. And probably some day someone else will pass his record.

I just feel lucky that i was alive to be able to see Sharpe, Lofton and Driver play for the Packers.

Same with Bart Starr. His numbers are small compared to what Favre did here. And Starr was the winning QB in 5 NFL championship games. I think Starr threw only 156 career TD's. In today's passing game, maybe he wouldn't have been very good. But in his time, he was pretty amazing. Same if you tried to put Favre into the 1960's game. Back then, QB's were not protected. I doubt Favre could have had the playing game streak that he ended up having if he had to play back then.

But that in my eyes does not take away from what each of them did.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago


The guys on the field are freaks of nature these days, and I think the heroes of yesteryear, as awesome as I still find them, would for the most part be average to good in today's game.

Originally Posted by: pack_in_black 




You're going to get a slap nuts for this post. I'd venture to say there are players in the NFL hall of fame that couldn't make a modern day roster.
UserPostedImage
pack_in_black
13 years ago

Today's players are much bigger then those from the past. In the "old days" there were almost NO players that weighed over 300 pounds, Now, they are on every team. And the size and strength of the WR's is amazing. If you took a man from the 1930's and threw him into a game today, i doubt he would fare well. Also, to take a WR of today and throw them into a 1930's team, and he's probably be on IR after one game, as they could just about take your head off with no penalty.

What i'm trying to say is, if DD gets the record, he earned it. And probably some day someone else will pass his record.

I just feel lucky that i was alive to be able to see Sharpe, Lofton and Driver play for the Packers.

Same with Bart Starr. His numbers are small compared to what Favre did here. And Starr was the winning QB in 5 NFL championship games. I think Starr threw only 156 career TD's. In today's passing game, maybe he wouldn't have been very good. But in his time, he was pretty amazing. Same if you tried to put Favre into the 1960's game. Back then, QB's were not protected. I doubt Favre could have had the playing game streak that he ended up having if he had to play back then.

But that in my eyes does not take away from what each of them did.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



That's pretty much what I was going for Cheesey, but you said it a little more thoroughly

UserPostedImage
Thanks to Pack93z for the sig!
Pack93z
13 years ago



The guys on the field are freaks of nature these days, and I think the heroes of yesteryear, as awesome as I still find them, would for the most part be average to good in today's game.

Originally Posted by: pack_in_black 




Agreed if we tried to line players up from then to the players of now, it would be total domination for the most part position to position.

However that still doesn't change the basis that the rules back then were drastically skewed to the defense in the passing game verses the offensive passing skew of today.

Put Hutson in an offense with the rule sets of today.. he would tear it up against players in his era using the style of game played today.

Any passing numbers today, in my opinion.. really can't be compared accurately to number of Hutson's time or really even Lofton's time.. when they eliminated contact beyond 5 yards and then tightened the screws on even "feeling" where the receiver is.. it totally changed the game. Not to mention the bullshit pansy ass calls that some of the "star" QB's get.. and cutting back on what defensive lineman can do to fight off a block.

Today's game is geared for points and offense.. every time the defenses figure out how to slow down the offenses.. the NFL tweaks the rules to give the advantage back to the offense.

Anyway.. now that I am done babbling again... the point is.. Driver has benefited from laxed rules of today's game. With that.. it doesn't diminish the accomplishment.. he has earned it against a higher level of athletic competition.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

To be fair, in today's league, you can't have an impact in a championship game after staying out all night the night before. 🤣

The guys on the field are freaks of nature these days, and I think the heroes of yesteryear, as awesome as I still find them, would for the most part be average to good in today's game.

Originally Posted by: pack_in_black 




So what you are saying is if a player who excelled in the days before year round training learned to do so without all the modern convinces, they would not be able to become elite players today as well? 😳
If Hutson had the drive and knew what it took to stand out in his day, he could do it today as well.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
13 years ago

So what you are saying is if a player who excelled in the days before year round training learned to do so without all the modern convinces, they would not be able to become elite players today as well? 😳
If Hutson had the drive and knew what it took to stand out in his day, he could do it today as well.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Agreed. This point is not brought up often enough. If the old players were around today, they would be in the weight room. Downgrading old athletes for a lack of speed and strength compared to the athletes of today is not much different from downgrading them due to inferior equipment.
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (5h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (5h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (6h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (6h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (7h) : Who? What?
beast (15h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (20h) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
19m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.