Packers Looking To Trade Nick Barnett: National Football Post· Page 2

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

[stupid]

I don't think Uncle Ted will cut him for cap space. He will want some value, and I don't think we give him away on the cheap either.

I do think Barnett would have a hard time accepting a back up role.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Nick would love it if ted cut him. He could go anywhere he wanted with no strings attached.

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

#12

I don't think Uncle Ted will cut him for cap space. He will want some value, and I don't think we give him away on the cheap either.

I do think Barnett would have a hard time accepting a back up role.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

I agree with this. Unless Barnett becomes a problem and a big distraction then they might trade them to the higher non-NFCN bidder at what ever the offer is.

why can't Bishop and Barnett compete for a starting job?

Originally Posted by: dhpackr

As far as I know they can. But it sounds like MM said Bishop will get the 1st reps which Barnett wasn't happy about at all... and stirred the pot a bit asking on twitter something like how can a guy lose his spot when he wasn't beat out on the field... and talking how an injured player shouldn't lose their spot.

Then again, also on twitter he said he had a good dinner and great talk with KGB who also had to take a back-up role after not being as good stopping the run as he needed to be to keep the starting job. KGB still got his big money as a back-up and still helped the team even though he was no longer the starter.

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#13

why can't Bishop and Barnett compete for a starting job?

Originally Posted by: dhpackr

Because we already know what both of these players can do, and Bishop is better. In that sense, he DID beat out Barnett on the field. When you know who the best player is, you give him his reps in practice with the #1 defense so he can be in top form for the season, rather than subjecting him to a meaningless training camp battle in which the loser would be paid millions to sit the bench. That would be an expensive, divisive way to run a football team.

blank

DakotaT
Select Member

14 years ago

#14

If we do end up keeping Barnett, I am positive that Dom will be able to find a way to use him. A third round pick would be acceptable compensation if traded. A better trade would be for a 3-4 defense to give us their 3rd OLB on the depth chart, so that we have a guy that can play this year.

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#15

The Packers would listen to trade offers for Barnett?

That is no more shocking than that I learned to hop one legged based on need. lol.

If the Packers keep Barnett.. he better learn how to pass rush from the edge.. opposite of Clay.. otherwise barring injury he has an uphill battle for extensive playing time.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#16

Ever since the Packers got Barnett I always thought he'd do better on the edge than inside because of his speed. Then someone pointed out that Nick Barnett can not shed a block even if he was doused in Vaseline.

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

👍

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Of course he can't... but outside at least he can set the edge if he can't get off the block so to speak.

Personally.. he is a sideline to sideline "flow" type backer.. not many have the range he has overall.. but in the fray he just isn't at his best. IMO.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

DakotaT
Select Member

14 years ago

#19

His best position is a WLB in a Tampa 2 defense. I doubt we trade him to TB, Chi, or Minnesota; where he'd flourish.

Stevetarded
Registered

14 years ago

#20

His salary makes him difficult to trade.

Getting anything would be a good thing.

If released, the Lions would sure want him.

Originally Posted by: CaliforniaCheez

Not really, he's pretty much making a decent starters' salary which is what he is. If a team trades for him it's probably for him to be their starting MLB and 4-5 mil/ season isn't really all that much.

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (5h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off

Mucky Tundra (10h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing

Zero2Cool (10h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name

Mucky Tundra (11h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Who's Theo?

Zero2Cool (11h) : How is Theo alliteration?

Mucky Tundra (11h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations

Zero2Cool (13h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.

Zero2Cool (14h) : Oh, it's toe injury

Zero2Cool (15h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink

dfosterf (15h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields

dfosterf (15h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns

Zero2Cool (15h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead

Zero2Cool (15h) : He's on Browns, right?

dfosterf (15h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out

dfosterf (15h) : Fleece 'em again!

Zero2Cool (15h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after

packerfanoutwest (15h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.

dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?

wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.

dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty

wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.

Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute

wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.

wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.

dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.

beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.

beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!

beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?

wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues

wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back

Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.

dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev

Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.

Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2025 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM

COMMANDERS

Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM

Browns

Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM

Cowboys

Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM

BENGALS

Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM

Cardinals

Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM

Steelers

Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM

PANTHERS

Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM

EAGLES

Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM

Giants

Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM

Bears

Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM

RAVENS

Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM

Vikings