DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • Select Member Topic Starter
16 years ago
I didn't get to see the game, but I heard it on the radio. Hawk's name was called quite a bit. Did Hawk play well, and does he have a future there?
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
16 years ago
Well considering that we didn't play a ton of base defense, we played with 5 dbs for the most part.. I think the jury is still out on whether he will be able to handle the heavy traffic when a team forces us to drop into a ton of base with Hawk really and truly playing the middle.

But he was playing more aggressive again yesterday.. more like the Hawk of the first week or two of the season.. he had a bit of attitude about him yesterday.

That was the most interesting part about it for me.. without Barnett on the field he seems more vocal and played a little more intense.. I wonder if it is just him stepping up with Barnett out of there, if is was the added responsibility of donning the headset and making the calls, or if it is something deeper than that...

He and Chillar were on the field for the most part.. they both played very well.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
gbpfan
16 years ago
It was a good test for him,which I think he did good at.Don't know if Saints have another r.b with Bush out they like to pass more and think the d-line will be all over them,our o-line should have another good run game pack is back :icon_smile:
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I'm not sure I'm sold on Hawk at MLB. I did think he looked more 'fit' for the position than he does on the outside. Maybe it's the number, but his roaming around reminded me of Singletary a lil bit. He had those wings open a little bit jus waiting to grapple someone an rip them to the turf.


If he succeeds and outperforms even what Barnett did, it'd be interesting to see if Barnett could improve our WLB position in a similar fashion. I think Barnett played Safety in college so he should be able to cover fairly well.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
16 years ago
I was out at deer camp (didn't get the monster buck) so I didn't see the game but it's good to hear that Hawk did well.
I haven't been real happy with his lackluster play up to now.
Hopefully he can build on this game!
porky88
16 years ago
It's not that Hawk was great, it's that Barnett wasn't very good this season. With Hawk, you had a linebacker who didn't over pursue and held his own. You had a backer that actually wrapped up instead of going for the big hit. Barnett would over pursue and go for the big hit instead of wrapping up. He was playing way to aggressive for whatever reason.

Hawk was vice versa.
obi1
16 years ago

I'm not sure I'm sold on Hawk at MLB. I did think he looked more 'fit' for the position than he does on the outside. Maybe it's the number, but his roaming around reminded me of Singletary a lil bit. He had those wings open a little bit jus waiting to grapple someone an rip them to the turf.


If he succeeds and outperforms even what Barnett did, it'd be interesting to see if Barnett could improve our WLB position in a similar fashion. I think Barnett played Safety in college so he should be able to cover fairly well.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Zero,

You gotta admit though that Packers did NOT miss a step with Hawk in the middle. Barnett may be the MLB as listed on the Packers brochures but Hawk may be just as good.

At least I thought he held his own. May be it was the scheme that he played in but, I thought he played well for most part.
blank
Bigbyfan
16 years ago

I'm not sure I'm sold on Hawk at MLB. I did think he looked more 'fit' for the position than he does on the outside. Maybe it's the number, but his roaming around reminded me of Singletary a lil bit. He had those wings open a little bit jus waiting to grapple someone an rip them to the turf.


If he succeeds and outperforms even what Barnett did, it'd be interesting to see if Barnett could improve our WLB position in a similar fashion. I think Barnett played Safety in college so he should be able to cover fairly well.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I wouldn't mind having AJ Hawk play like Singletary.... but that may just be me 🙂
blank
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
Barnett's body is more apt for weak side isn't it?
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
all_about_da_packers
16 years ago

It's not that Hawk was great, it's that Barnett wasn't very good this season. With Hawk, you had a linebacker who didn't over pursue and held his own. You had a backer that actually wrapped up instead of going for the big hit. Barnett would over pursue and go for the big hit instead of wrapping up. He was playing way to aggressive for whatever reason.

Hawk was vice versa.

"porky88" wrote:



I have to disagree a little with you porky, I think in Barnett's earlier years he did over pursue, but this year he wasn't aggressive.

Instead of running into the hole to meet the RB like he did so much of last year, this year Barnett waited for the RB to get in the hole and come to him.

I think the lack of aggressiveness vividly stood out in the Atlanta game, where a RB (Turner, I think) had Barnett solo on the outside, and Turner was shaking and trying to get Barnett to bite. Barnett just stood there, stayed back and waited for Turner to pick the direction and start running towards him.

On NFL Replay they showed last year's match-up against the Chargers in week 3. LT had Barnett in a similar position (outside, solo) and was trying to do what Turner did, shaking to try and get Barnett to bite. As LT started to shake, Barnett just flat out attacked him, and got LT for a minimal gain.

Perhaps it's as simple as Barnett thinking he was backed up on the LT play, and not on the Turner play, which led to the hesitation. But that's sort of the difference between this year and last year, Barnett seemed to lack the aggressive instinct of going after the player, instead chosing to meet him as he came out of the gap.

Hawk was, even in the Nickle LB package, far more aggressive in attacking the line of scrimmage. He over pursued at times too (Z captured one such moment in his highlight video), but it was nice to see that aggressiveness again.

Although I have to say that IMO the past couple of weeks Barnett was returning to that aggressive style of the previous year.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (2h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : HUMP DAY
    beast (5h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
    beast (5h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I could be wrong there though
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
    Zero2Cool (5h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
    beast (5h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
    Zero2Cool (5h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
    Zero2Cool (5h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
    beast (7h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
    Zero2Cool (7h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
    beast (7h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
    beast (7h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
    beast (21h) : Cowboys denied Bears request
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
    Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    18h / Around The NFL / beast

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

    7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.