Packers make trade with 49ers 5th round

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

Packers make trade with 49ers
Posted by Mike Spofford on April 30, 2011 2:26 pm

The Packers have traded a fifth-round pick to San Francisco for a sixth-round pick and a seventh-rounder.

Green Bay traded pick No. 163 to the 49ers for picks 174 and 231.

The Packers now have three sixth-round picks and two seventh-rounders to go today.

I wish GB was trading these picks for picks next year instead of extra picks this year.

Maybe Uncle Teddy looked around and realized he needs to get some players on defense too.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

THEY JUST TRADED WITH MIAMI!

The Packers have made their third trade of the day, swapping this time with the Miami Dolphins.

This one is another two-for-two swap. The Packers have given up picks 174 in the sixth round and 231 in the seventh round in exchange for Miamis 179th and 218th picks, also sixth- and seventh-round selections.

The Packers still have five picks left to make today.

djcubez
Senior Member

13 years ago

I swear it's because he can't sign UDFA's. He's trying to stockpile picks to make sure he gets the guys he wants. At least that's what I think.

Kingkoopa
Registered

13 years ago

I swear it's because he can't sign UDFA's. He's trying to stockpile picks to make sure he gets the guys he wants. At least that's what I think.

"djcubez" wrote:

Makes a ton of sense if you think about it.

blank

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

I wish GB was trading these picks for picks next year instead of extra picks this year.

"wpr" wrote:

Why would you rather have picks next year than this year? I don't see any advantage to that.

blank

Kingkoopa
Registered

13 years ago

I wish GB was trading these picks for picks next year instead of extra picks this year.

"Greg C." wrote:

Why would you rather have picks next year than this year? I don't see any advantage to that.

"wpr" wrote:

I agree, especially when Ted doesn't know who is going to come out next year.

blank

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

I wish GB was trading these picks for picks next year instead of extra picks this year.

"Kingkoopa" wrote:

Why would you rather have picks next year than this year? I don't see any advantage to that.

"Greg C." wrote:

I agree, especially when Ted doesn't know who is going to come out next year.

"wpr" wrote:

I would rather trade a 5 this year for a 4 next year. Turn a 6 into a 5. No one knows who is coming out next year but The talent pool a round higher should be better. Generally speaking.

Greg C.
Registered

13 years ago

I wish GB was trading these picks for picks next year instead of extra picks this year.

"wpr" wrote:

Why would you rather have picks next year than this year? I don't see any advantage to that.

"Kingkoopa" wrote:

I agree, especially when Ted doesn't know who is going to come out next year.

"Greg C." wrote:

I would rather trade a 5 this year for a 4 next year. Turn a 6 into a 5. No one knows who is coming out next year but The talent pool a round higher should be better. Generally speaking.

"wpr" wrote:

Ah, higher picks. I get it. I remember a few years ago when Ted traded a seventh round pick in the draft for a sixth round pick in the next year's draft. That was pretty neat. The other team really wanted a guy, I guess. But I was glad that my team was on the better end of that deal.

blank

wpr
Preferred Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

The only thing I can think of is that Ted doesn't expect these guys to make the team and he doesn't want to tie up a lot of money in signing bonuses.

StoicFire
Member

13 years ago

#10

I think it is possible that picks this year may be more important for filling needs due to the unique situation with the league lockout.

In general I wouldn't argue with future picks though... this year just seems like a special situation.

"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (30m) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (31m) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (32m) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (4h) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (5h) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (5h) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (7h) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (7h) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (7h) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (9h) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (11h) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (18h) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Game not over yet

beast (19h) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (19h) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (19h) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (20h) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21h) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21h) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Mucky Tundra (21h) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE

packerfanoutwest (21h) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Ravens still alive, but barely

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Time to make dinner

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : DAGGER

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : pass plays

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Do or die time for the Rams

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking field goals are impressive

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oh that might be a backbreaker

Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure

TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking doesn't make much sense

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22