Formo
14 years ago


No chance? It's in the legislature as we speak, sparky. It's too early to say one way or another how it's gonna fair. Unless, of course, you are talking about the MN legislature. In that case, no matter the proposal it has no chance in hell.

"DakotaT" wrote:



I read somewhere that if they would have put the issue to a referrendum, that it would have failed miserably. So much for the myth of great Viking fan support and pride. Minnesotans are taxed at a very high rate, top ten in the country every year. Your state and local tax burden in 2009 was at 38.8%, 2nd highest in the nation, and those jackasses you elect want to increase that so the Vikings can play 8 games a year? I don't see it happening Formo, but start singing some Bon Jovi - Livin on Prayer.

"Formo" wrote:



Did you read my first post? The one that said essentially if one didn't want to pay for the stadium they didn't have to. The taxes on the stadium are spread out. Money isn't TAKEN from the public (unless when I say public, you hear a scratch off addicted, merchandise buyin' Viking employee who's getting paid more than $250,000 annually). No money will be taken from public coffers for this stadium.

So saying that those ass clowns (we agree on that) elected want to increase the state tax 'burden' to pay for a stadium is misleading at best.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Formo
14 years ago


No chance? It's in the legislature as we speak, sparky. It's too early to say one way or another how it's gonna fair. Unless, of course, you are talking about the MN legislature. In that case, no matter the proposal it has no chance in hell.

"wpr" wrote:



I read somewhere that if they would have put the issue to a referrendum, that it would have failed miserably. So much for the myth of great Viking fan support and pride. Minnesotans are taxed at a very high rate, top ten in the country every year. Your state and local tax burden in 2009 was at 38.8%, 2nd highest in the nation, and those jackasses you elect want to increase that so the Vikings can play 8 games a year? I don't see it happening Formo, but start singing some Bon Jovi - Livin on Prayer.

"DakotaT" wrote:



In this difficult economic climate it would make more sense to expand U Minn field from the nearly 51,000 it currently holds to the 80,000 it can hold  instead of repairing the worthless Dumpty Dome or building a field soley for Vikings. And yes I know NFL teams like thousands of luxury boxes in order to stuff more into their pockets. But if they are not going to build the stadium their selves they need to take what is given to them.

"Formo" wrote:



There would be a lot of logistics that would go into that expansion. Not sure how it would work financially, but I know the U wouldn't give a penny to expand as it would probably hurt their football team's atmosphere.

The bill that's in the legislature now is a start, and a good one. It has a snow ball's chance to go through, though, without a site and stadium design inked and planned. I'm actually very surprised that there aren't any PSLs in it.. I would like to see more of that than new taxes (although like I said in previous posts, it's not like the taxes would burden anyone that didn't want to pay them).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Cheesey
14 years ago

....We'll even take your smart ass uncle VR. :onfloor:

"vikesrule" wrote:



Things that would be much more pleasant to do, than becoming a freakin' cheesehead

.. have my nuts chewed off by a pack of wild dogs.
...suck the snot out of a gorilla's nose until the back of his head caves in.
...slide down a barbed wire banister into a bucket of alcohol.
...stick my genitals in a bees nest.
...drink a gallon of turpentine and then piss on a forest fire.
...watch Rosie O'Donnell and Roseanne mud wrestle in the nude.
...pork a polar bear in a phone booth.
...cram my dick in the ass of a bear with inflamed hemorrhoids.
...try to open a beer bottle with my sphincter and not a twist off either.
...shave my poison-ivy covered legs with a dull barber's razor and no water or soap.
.. nail my dick to the middle of a 2x4 and set both ends on fire and try to get loose with a butter knife.
...ride a donkey naked through the desert with snapping turtles attached to my balls.
...be tied to a chair and forced to listen to Barry Manilow tunes while having my tonsils removed with a rusty spoon.

"DakotaT" wrote:


And HE should KNOW!
After all, he's already DONE all of those things!
LOLOL!!!
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
14 years ago

Did you read my first post? The one that said essentially if one didn't want to pay for the stadium they didn't have to. The taxes on the stadium are spread out. Money isn't TAKEN from the public (unless when I say public, you hear a scratch off addicted, merchandise buyin' Viking employee who's getting paid more than $250,000 annually). No money will be taken from public coffers for this stadium.

So saying that those ass clowns (we agree on that) elected want to increase the state tax 'burden' to pay for a stadium is misleading at best.

"Formo" wrote:



Sounds like a fuckin fairy tale plan to me buddy; and good luck with that. No, the state of Minnesota should foot the bill for the whole thing, with a retractible roof like in Indy and then use the shit out of the building: concerts, other sporting events, knitting shows - and then charge Zygi up the ass for rent. All Zygi gets is a percentage of the gate and no concessions. If he don't like, buy him out, and set your team up like the Packers. Fvuck these asshole billionaires wanting taxpayer welfare.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago


There would be a lot of logistics that would go into that expansion. Not sure how it would work financially, but I know the U wouldn't give a penny to expand as it would probably hurt their football team's atmosphere.

The bill that's in the legislature now is a start, and a good one. It has a snow ball's chance to go through, though, without a site and stadium design inked and planned. I'm actually very surprised that there aren't any PSLs in it.. I would like to see more of that than new taxes (although like I said in previous posts, it's not like the taxes would burden anyone that didn't want to pay them).

"Formo" wrote:



Certainly there would be logistics. There will be that issue will any building project. There will even be logistics after the expansion is done. But 7 home college games and 10 NFL (incl preseason. post season won't matter as the U will be long done by then.) can be worked out.

My suggestion of sharing a stadium is after the good citizens of MN have turned the NFL down 3?-5? times already. It seems that building a "half stadium" that is shared and not left sitting empty 80-90% of the year would be move viable for people to get behind.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Did you read my first post? The one that said essentially if one didn't want to pay for the stadium they didn't have to. The taxes on the stadium are spread out. Money isn't TAKEN from the public (unless when I say public, you hear a scratch off addicted, merchandise buyin' Viking employee who's getting paid more than $250,000 annually). No money will be taken from public coffers for this stadium.

So saying that those ass clowns (we agree on that) elected want to increase the state tax 'burden' to pay for a stadium is misleading at best.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Sounds like a fuckin fairy tale plan to me buddy; and good luck with that. No, the state of Minnesota should foot the bill for the whole thing, with a retractible roof like in Indy and then use the shit out of the building: concerts, other sporting events, knitting shows - and then charge Zygi up the ass for rent. All Zygi gets is a percentage of the gate and no concessions. If he don't like, buy him out, and set your team up like the Packers. Fvuck these asshole billionaires wanting taxpayer welfare.

"Formo" wrote:



Yup, lets have a barely profitable business, build a huge new building that benefits the state just as much as it does the business, and foot the entire bill. Yup. Makes sense.

Anyway, I'd love it if Zygi paid the entire thing on his own. But why should he when the state doesn't even want the Vikings? I wouldn't if I were him either. It's a piss poor business move.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DakotaT
14 years ago

Yup, lets have a barely profitable business, build a huge new building that benefits the state just as much as it does the business, and foot the entire bill. Yup. Makes sense.

Anyway, I'd love it if Zygi paid the entire thing on his own. But why should he when the state doesn't even want the Vikings? I wouldn't if I were him either. It's a piss poor business move.

"Formo" wrote:



So you accept that he bought the Vikings to move them? Well at least he took a shot by taking on our Diva. Can always hang on to that excuse if the refs wouldn't have screwed us.

Sorry Formo, I give you a lot of shit, but I don't want to see you miserable bastards lose your football team.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Yup, lets have a barely profitable business, build a huge new building that benefits the state just as much as it does the business, and foot the entire bill. Yup. Makes sense.

Anyway, I'd love it if Zygi paid the entire thing on his own. But why should he when the state doesn't even want the Vikings? I wouldn't if I were him either. It's a piss poor business move.

"DakotaT" wrote:



So you accept that he bought the Vikings to move them? Well at least he took a shot by taking on our Diva. Can always hang on to that excuse if the refs wouldn't have screwed us.

Sorry Formo, I give you a lot of shit, but I don't want to see you miserable bastards lose your football team.

"Formo" wrote:



I don't accept that he bought the team to move it. I believe him when he says he wants to keep them here.. But you can only do so much with the retards in MN's office. Zigy did more for the team in his first 2 years as owner than Red did his entire time at the helm.. And in fact, because of Red McComb's completely moronic actions during his time as the Vikings' owner he actually did more harm than good for the Vikings drive for a new stadium.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Formo
14 years ago


There would be a lot of logistics that would go into that expansion. Not sure how it would work financially, but I know the U wouldn't give a penny to expand as it would probably hurt their football team's atmosphere.

The bill that's in the legislature now is a start, and a good one. It has a snow ball's chance to go through, though, without a site and stadium design inked and planned. I'm actually very surprised that there aren't any PSLs in it.. I would like to see more of that than new taxes (although like I said in previous posts, it's not like the taxes would burden anyone that didn't want to pay them).

"wpr" wrote:



Certainly there would be logistics. There will be that issue will any building project. There will even be logistics after the expansion is done. But 7 home college games and 10 NFL (incl preseason. post season won't matter as the U will be long done by then.) can be worked out.

My suggestion of sharing a stadium is after the good citizens of MN have turned the NFL down 3?-5? times already. It seems that building a "half stadium" that is shared and not left sitting empty 80-90% of the year would be move viable for people to get behind.

"Formo" wrote:



I hear what you are saying. As a Gopher fan first and foremost, I can't say I'm for that type of plan, though. The Gophers have JUST gotten out of the Viking's shadows after 20+ years in the worst venue possible for both organizations.. They finally have something they can call home. Then, years after the Vikings turned down the U's proposal for a shared stadium, they come knocking? I for one wouldn't like it.

But if that's what it takes to keep the Vikes in MN. I guess I'd reluctantly accept it.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DakotaT
14 years ago


I don't accept that he bought the team to move it. I believe him when he says he wants to keep them here.. But you can only do so much with the retards in MN's office. Zigy did more for the team in his first 2 years as owner than Red did his entire time at the helm.. And in fact, because of Red McComb's completely moronic actions during his time as the Vikings' owner he actually did more harm than good for the Vikings drive for a new stadium.

"Formo" wrote:



You actually think Zygi is the good guy in this situation don't you? The fact is right now your state government can't help even if they wanted to, because Minnesota is broke. Where are the private investors in your community Formo? Why isn't anybody stepping up to the plate? What about the wealthy corporations around that area like 3M?

For someone who takes such a staunch viewpoint on welfare and government funding, you sure are quick to want your state government to jump on board with this stadium. No, I stand by what I said, if the Minnesota state government goes in on this, then they should buy the whole thing and reap the profits from it too. The only thing Zygi should be to you guys is some rich east coast prick using your team. You think they love Model in Cleveland - you guys are in the same situation right now.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (5h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
    Zero2Cool (5h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
    wpr (5h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
    wpr (5h) : now 3
    Zero2Cool (6h) : Who? What?
    beast (15h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
    Martha Careful (19h) : meh
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
    wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
    dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
    wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
    beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.