Good Horse (player) to follow· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

I'd also like to read about the other horses I backed that were wrong. In the beginning of this, I wasn't doubting you, but now after reading this, I'm fairly confident you're full of shit. :)

"DakotaT" wrote:

What took you so long dumbass, usually it only takes 1 post to know I'm full of shit. 🙂 And he still isn't a pass rush specialist if all he can get sacks on are the Bears shitty o-line. Although the sodomizing of Rex is a picture that will live in infamy. Are we done now?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

A simple search, this is a few things I said about KGB.

I've always personally like KGB, but I think its time to trade or let him go. He's not getting younger, or healthy and is not effective anymore. When teams see him on the line, they audible to a run to his side and get a first down.

"Tue Oct 07, 2008 05:10 PM " wrote:

I wish I had posted this earlier this morning when I read an article saying the Packers had until 3pm today, but I'm not really shocked by it. There's been some conflicting statements about KGB's health, he's getting older, can't stop the run and he's lost his speed. With Montgomery and Hunter both healthy and active, it made it logical to let KGB go.

You might be in the UK, but you can count on this website to bring you the latest news and some good highlights and maybe a view of the game as well for ya Wink

"Sat Nov 01, 2008 01:56 PM " wrote:

Shocked...

We release KGB and keep Harrell.

Explain....

"Sat Nov 01, 2008 01:38 PM " wrote:

You don't watch the games much do ya bud? :)

KGB, can't stop the run, Packers are weak against the run, KGB is only a pass rusher and since hurting his knee he has not been the same force. We have Jason Hunter back, healthy and he's consider a pass rush specialist. He's also younger too.

Harrell is a first round draft pick in whom the Packers need to see what they have in him. It's in second season and we have very little to go off of.

"flep" wrote:

I think it's probably because KGB is one of our highest paid players. If he didn't make so much money, he probably wouldn't have been a casualty.

"Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:03 PM " wrote:

Are you serious? You think this is solely about money?

KGB is a veteran, meaning the Packers have to pay him his remaining salary for the year, even if they cut him. This move saves the Packers no money, and the fact that we are loads under the salary cap means we didn't need to save the money anyways, seeing as cap surplus doesn't carry from year to year.

This move is simply to sure up our biggest weakness: Run D. KGB is a one trick pony, and lately he had been doing his one trick pretty poorly. Given that KGB doesn't play ST either, this move was the only move that would least impact the overall dynamics of the team. Pettaway and Hunter will now be relied on to fill KGB's role on 3rd Downs.

The interesting thing in all of this is that I thought KGB was coming off his best game of the season against the Colts. That's not really saying a whole lot considering how ineffective KGB has been this year, but I thought the improvement would've bought him some time to see if he could continue his upward play. I guess that wasn't going to be the case.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

Well said AADP.

"blueleopard" wrote:

KGB had 15 games of 2 or more sacks.

Here's a shocker, he didn't have more sacks against the Bears during his career, it was actually the Vikings.

MIN 11.5
CHI 10
DET 7
TB 7
CAR 4
WAS 4

Top three teams he sacked were within the division, played twice a year.

This was a good little time killer while waiting for dinner.

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#12

And if memory serves correctly, our whole division licked ass in KGB's glory days, correct? But at least he was better than Jamal Reynolds. For as much sunshine as was shot up Wolf's ass for getting us Favre, he sure screwed the pooch on a lot of picks. I guess when you've had a 25 year drought, anything looks like a savior.

I hope your dinner was good Zero, I spent part of my evening looking for earrings for my daughters and helping Mrs. Dakota pick out underwear at Victoria Secret. Actually, I set off the creepy old man sensor and they kicked me out of VS.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#13

"DakotaT" wrote:

I've had better.

Point is, KGB was what I said he was and nothing more. You are ZERO for 2. Get it? 🙂

You have nothing! Muwhahaha

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#14

I've had better.

Point is, KGB was what I said he was and nothing more. You are ZERO for 2. Get it? 🙂

You have nothing! Muwhahaha

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

When those two make the Packer hall of fame, I'm Zero for 2. Now get a babysitter and go out and some, you know, and quit bugging me. Marquette is getting their ass kicked.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#15

I've had better.

Point is, KGB was what I said he was and nothing more. You are ZERO for 2. Get it? 🙂

You have nothing! Muwhahaha

"DakotaT" wrote:

When those two make the Packer hall of fame, I'm Zero for 2. Now get a babysitter and go out and some, you know, and quit bugging me. Marquette is getting their ass kicked.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Javon will never make the Packers Hall of Fame, he had one good year as a Packer. He had one more good year, then had one of his best friends murdered in his lap, suppose you think that doesn't change a man huh? KGB, I could see him getting in because I believe he leads all Packers in sacks.

You are Zero for 2, accept it and throw down some more names that I've backed that were 'wrong'.

... waiting ... holding breath ...

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#16

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

You know I'm too lazy to go back and look, but I don't think much of your two horses so we'll leave it at that.

zombieslayer
Registered

13 years ago

#17

Hey Zero - Dakota told me that you're a poo poo head.

(I want to see this keep going).

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#18

Hey Zombie, go sit out on the beach today and watch the waves. 🙂

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

13 years ago

#19

Hey Zero - Dakota told me that you're a poo poo head.

(I want to see this keep going).

"zombieslayer" wrote:

I was hoping for it to keep going, however, he has nothing as I've effectively proven. 🙂

DakotaT
Select Member Topic Starter

13 years ago

#20

Hey Zero - Dakota told me that you're a poo poo head.

(I want to see this keep going).

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I was hoping for it to keep going, however, he has nothing as I've effectively proven. :)

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Barry Sanders is a pussy who refused to finish his career for the team that made him a millionire. I have to go watch Mia at the hospital now, so I'll check back later if I still have an account.

You asked for it.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (2h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (2h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (3h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (4h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (4h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (4h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (7h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (7h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (7h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (7h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (7h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (7h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (7h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (7h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (7h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (7h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (7h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (8h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (8h) : Packers will get in

beast (8h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS