Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
musccy
13 years ago


Ted Thompson called the bluff and cut Hawk. Then his agent started to negotiate.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



Since69 mentioned (though w/out a link) that other teams wanted to sign Hawk, and I think it was pretty clear that BOTH parties wanted to work this out. I really don't see this as being a power play by Ted because he jeopardized losing Hawk with the cut... both sides just needed to iron out a few more details.
IronMan
  • IronMan
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Ted Thompson: Winning.
Since69
13 years ago

Ted Thompson: Winning.

"IronMan" wrote:



+1
UserPostedImage
Since69
13 years ago


Ted Thompson called the bluff and cut Hawk. Then his agent started to negotiate.

"musccy" wrote:



Since69 mentioned (though w/out a link) that other teams wanted to sign Hawk, and I think it was pretty clear that BOTH parties wanted to work this out. I really don't see this as being a power play by Ted because he jeopardized losing Hawk with the cut... both sides just needed to iron out a few more details.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Other-teams-came-after-Packers-Hawk?urn=nfl-329649 

Not much more helpful than my post, though...

Another unhelpful link... 
UserPostedImage
musccy
13 years ago
Thanks - as you said it was pretty vague, but I don't doubt that there was interest in a starting LB of a SB winning team!
zombieslayer
13 years ago

I think as a group, PH members put him Above Average but under Solid.

"Greg C." wrote:



I wonder what definition of "solid" is being used here. I don't know how Hawk could be considered anything less than solid. I always describe him as "very good."

No, Hawk won't be getting sacks like CM3 or picks like Collins or Woody

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Interceptions during 2010 season:

Woodson--2
Hawk--3
Collins--4

The other guys had more chances but dropped them. Hawk doesn't drop them.

Number of tackles means very little, though. The player who leads the team in tackles is usually the inside or middle linebacker who played the most snaps. Note that Bishop was a close second to Hawk. He was the other ILB.



Poor, Fair, Average, Above Average, Solid, Elite

As for tackles, you still gotta make them. If a MLB/ILB misses a lot of tackles, coaches start the other guy.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
13 years ago

As for tackles, you still gotta make them. If a MLB/ILB misses a lot of tackles, coaches start the other guy.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



So having a lot of tackles means an ILB is good enough to start. But you don't need to look at the stat to know if a guy's been playing.
blank
zombieslayer
13 years ago


So having a lot of tackles means an ILB is good enough to start. But you don't need to look at the stat to know if a guy's been playing.

"Greg C." wrote:



Yup.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
Salary breakdown
 

The Green Bay Packers cut linebacker A.J. Hawk on Wednesday because they didn't want to pay him a guaranteed $10 million in the last year of his deal, but in the end Hawk got back his money - plus a little more - in the first year of his long-term deal.

According to a source with access to NFL players salary data, the five-year deal Hawk signed is worth $33.75 million and includes a first-year salary of around $11 million.

Hawk's deal includes an $8 million signing bonus, a $1.8 million roster bonus and a base salary of $1.15 million in 2011, the source said, all of which adds up to $10.95 million in first-year pay.

The signing bonus is the only guaranteed money, but Hawk is all but certain to get the first-year base salary and will receive most of the roster bonus before the season starts.

The Packers released Hawk with the intention of re-signing him to a more salary-cap friendly long-term deal and then negotiated with his agent, Mike McCartney, Wednesday night and into Thursday morning. The deal was completed before official business for the 2010 season was closed Thursday night.

In addition to his 2011 take, Hawk will earn:

A $4.4 million base salary, a $300,000 roster bonus and a $250,000 workout bonus in '12.

A $4.9 million base salary, a $300,000 roster bonus and a $250,000 workout bonus in '13.

A $4.9 million base salary, a $800,000 roster bonus and a $250,000 workout bonus in '14.

A $5.4 million base salary, a $800,000 roster bonus and a $250,000 workout bonus in '15.

Hawk's $6.75 million yearly average ranks sixth on the team behind quarterback Aaron Rodgers, wide receiver Greg Jennings, cornerbacks Tramon Williams and Charles Woodson and safety Nick Collins. He is just ahead of linebacker Nick Barnett's $6.6 million.

Hawk has a salary cap number of $4.55 million in 2011, $6.5 million in '12, $7.05 million in '13, $7.55 million in '14 and $8.05 million in '15.

Meanwhile, safety Charlie Peprah's two-year deal is worth $2.25 million and includes a $150,000 signing bonus, the source said.

He will earn base salaries of $840,000 in '11 and $1 million in '12. He has $100,000 of likely-to-be-earned incentives each year and workout bonuses of $10,000 in '11 and $50,000 in '12.


UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago
Thanks WPR.

By the way, we're not going to pay Nick B $6.6 million this year. Good luck Nick to whatever team you end up on (will be a 4-3 team).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.
    buckeyepackfan (18h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
    buckeyepackfan (18h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
    Mucky Tundra (22h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
    beast (27-Dec) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : That was terrible.
    TheKanataThrilla (27-Dec) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
    beast (27-Dec) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
    beast (27-Dec) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
    beast (27-Dec) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
    Zero2Cool (27-Dec) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
    beast (27-Dec) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
    wpr (27-Dec) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
    Mucky Tundra (27-Dec) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
    beast (27-Dec) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
    Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
    packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
    beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
    Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
    Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
    packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
    Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    23h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

    27-Dec / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

    27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.