Pack93z
14 years ago

Colledge is a loudmouth douche.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



I have a feeling that you probably wouldn't be able to find many quotes from Colledge to back that up. Probably something or another, but not enough to really qualify that strong of a statement.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Can we include the off the hook comments from his wife? 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
bozz_2006
14 years ago

Colledge is a loudmouth douche.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



I have a feeling that you probably wouldn't be able to find many quotes from Colledge to back that up. Probably something or another, but not enough to really qualify that strong of a statement.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



I've heard and seen plenty of Colledge interviews in the past five years for me to feel confident in saying that he is, in my opinion, a douche that talks a lot and doesn't have the skills to back up all that talk. That, again in my opinion, makes him a loudmouth douche. I don't like the way he plays and I don't like the way he carries himself and I don't like the way he talks. I don't need quotes to know how I feel about him. And I don't care if you agree with my opinion.
UserPostedImage
14 years ago

Colledge is a loudmouth douche.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



I have a feeling that you probably wouldn't be able to find many quotes from Colledge to back that up. Probably something or another, but not enough to really qualify that strong of a statement.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



I've heard and seen plenty of Colledge interviews in the past five years for me to feel confident in saying that he is, in my opinion, a douche that talks a lot and doesn't have the skills to back up all that talk. That, again in my opinion, makes him a loudmouth douche. I don't like the way he plays and I don't like the way he carries himself and I don't like the way he talks. I don't need quotes to know how I feel about him. And I don't care if you agree with my opinion.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



You DO need to be able to back something as strong as "loudmouth douche" up, if you want anyone to take your opinion seriously though. Just referring to "all that talk" without being able to produce any of it makes you look like the loudmouth douche instead of Colledge, whether you care or not.

Most people on this board can and will back their shit up. If you choose not to, that's on you. :tongue:
gbguy20
14 years ago

Colledge is a loudmouth douche.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



I have a feeling that you probably wouldn't be able to find many quotes from Colledge to back that up. Probably something or another, but not enough to really qualify that strong of a statement.

"bozz_2006" wrote:



I've heard and seen plenty of Colledge interviews in the past five years for me to feel confident in saying that he is, in my opinion, a douche that talks a lot and doesn't have the skills to back up all that talk. That, again in my opinion, makes him a loudmouth douche. I don't like the way he plays and I don't like the way he carries himself and I don't like the way he talks. I don't need quotes to know how I feel about him. And I don't care if you agree with my opinion.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:



You DO need to be able to back something as strong as "loudmouth douche" up, if you want anyone to take your opinion seriously though. Just referring to "all that talk" without being able to produce any of it makes you look like the loudmouth douche instead of Colledge, whether you care or not.

Most people on this board can and will back their shit up. If you choose not to, that's on you. :tongue:

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Well, most people on this board have also seen enough of what he is talking about to either agree with him, or at least understand where hes coming from.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
bozz_2006
14 years ago
There's a difference between not "being able to produce" the the evidence to back up my opinion and just not wanting spend the time and energy to do it. I feel like the majority of people who've paid attention to him and watched his interviews over the last five years know what I'm talking about. If not wanting to find the evidence to back up my opinion on Colledge means you dismiss my opinion, so be it.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
14 years ago

I always thought Lang would man LG and McDonald would take up C after Wells was done.

"djcubez" wrote:





Yeah, whatever happened to McDonald playing C?
As for Colledge being a douche, alot of that is in regards to the comments he made, was it last year? It was reported by the Milwuakee media, iirc how pissed he was that they weren't giving him the contract he wanted. Something like that. Then he came out out and denied it. But his wife wrote some bullshit column for a Green Bay paper.
Anyway, far as I'm concerned if Lang can bounce back this offseason, he should be able to compate at G or T. Nice problem to have, as they say.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Stevetarded
14 years ago
The way they talk about McDonalds potential and raw ability reminds me of how they used to talk about Sitton when he was a rookie.

(before you over-reactors get all gung-ho on me I am NOT saying McDonald is or will be as good as Sitton so STFU)
blank
millertime
14 years ago
The McDonald situation kind of reminds me of Tramon Williams. We were all pretty shocked when he made the final 53 in 2007. By the end of the year, he was the nickel back and the rest was history.

He was definitely a developmental guy. Hopefully he pans out better than Barbre or Giacomini did.
Greg C.
14 years ago
Offensive line is the one area where I don't have a lot of confidence in this GM or coaching staff, so I'm not going to get excited about McDonald or any of these other young guys until they show something on the field.

I do think Colledge can be replaced if necessary. He is not the most likeable player, but "loudmouth douche" seems a bit strong to me. He's been publicly criticized a lot, and most players don't respond gracefully to that sort of thing, even when it is largely deserved.
blank
bozz_2006
14 years ago
Perhaps I should have been particular, saying that often he has come off as a loudmouth douche, rather than using a blanket statement and generalizing that he is a loudmouth douche
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (8h) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (12h) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (12h) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (13h) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (13h) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (13h) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (13h) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (14h) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (14h) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (14h) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (14h) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (14h) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (14h) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (14h) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (14h) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16h) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16h) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16h) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
2h / Random Babble / bboystyle

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.