Cheesey
16 years ago

I'm not going to complain about a call like this when we sucked as bad as we did.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



So true.

I stepped away from the game for a few of minutes with the score 10-21, came back and saw we were leading 24-21.... I was ready to slap myself silly to make sure I wasn't dreaming.

"IronMan" wrote:


You're already silly......no need to slap yourself.
UserPostedImage
Formo
16 years ago

Actually, it's been reported several times it was a bad call and should not have been flagged. As has been said many times, if the ball was caught it would have been a legal pass, but since it was not caught it was not?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Of course it wouldn't have been called.. Because it wouldn't have been an intentional grounding call.. which is what the REAL penalty is.

The problem is.. Like I said before.. There is not a single WR, now or past, that would have been able to catch that 'pass'. None. Which would deem said 'pass' as one with no realistic chance of being caught. Which would rule as... Yup. You guessed it.

Intentional grounding.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Formo
16 years ago

It was B.S. period.
Rodgers threw the ball underhand in the area of a receiver.
Thats ALL he had to do in that situation.
Thats NOT an illegal pass OR intentional grounding.
The refs don't even know the rules they are supposed to be inforcing.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Actually the rule for intentional grounding says ball has to land AT or beyond los..

the ball landed at the 8.5 yard line los was the 10

"Formo" wrote:


Not if there is a receiver in the area, which there was.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Just because he's out of pocket, doesn't disqualify the intentional grounding call. Because he was out of the pocket (which could be argued either way), the other prerequisite is the ball has to land at or BEYOND the line of scrimmage, regardless of a receiver having a REALISTIC CHANCE of catching the ball. And, sorry, no receiver, now or ever, would have had any sort of chance of catching that ball. Because the ball came up short of the line of scrimmage, the intentional grounding call is good.

Also, to look at it realistically, I think it's safe to say that Rodgers wasn't attempting any sort of pass. He was simply just trying to get rid of it to avoid a sack/safety. Isn't that, by definition, an 'intentional grounding'?

The call is good. The way they announced it was bad.

"longtimefan" wrote:


Then any pass that falls incomplete that doesn't pass the line of scrimmage should be flagged, right?
If a player is in the area, it's not grounding. Thats the rule. There WAS a player in the area. THEY make up the damn rules and don't even know how to enforce them. Had there NOT been a receiver there, i'd agree with the intentional grounding. But he WAS there. Thats makes a HUGE difference.

"Cheesey" wrote:



http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/intentionalgrounding 
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
dfosterf
16 years ago
OK then, PLAN B EXCUSE:

This just posted on PFT:
Peterson should have been penalized near end of game 

Scroll down to it. Watch the video. This WOULD have changed the game. I shall tag this as excuse 2B :icon_smile:

Posted by Mike Florio on November 11, 2008, 5:17 p.m.

"Apart from the well-documented confusion regarding the illegal forward pass call that gave the Vikings two extra points in a game they won by one, readers continue to raise with us the contention that Vikings running back Adrian Peterson removed his helmet after scoring the decisive touchdown with 2:22 to play, and that the Vikings should have drawn a 15-yard penalty.

So, in an effort to get them to leave us alone fulfill our mission of embracing the issues that PFT Planets wants us to tackle, we decided to give the matter a look-see.

And theyre right.

The rule is clear; per Rule 12, Section 3, Article 1(h), the removal of a helmet during or after the play except when in the bench area constitutes unsportsmanlike conduct.

Even more clear is the fact that Peterson took his helmet off (or, perhaps more accurately given the thing that Peterson was wearing on his head, took it out) promptly after scoring. Heres the video forward to 2:35.





Thus, the Vikings should have been kicking off from their own 15, which would have changed the entire dynamic for the Packers potential game-winning drive.

Bottom line? Minnesotas 28-27 win carries almost as much tarnish as Denvers Week Two win over San Diego."


___________________________________

Here is a shorter and crappier version of what Florio put up. If you want to see the good one, click on the link above.

[youtube]a7RKew_e1k4[/youtube]
Cheesey
16 years ago
I guess rules arn't enforced all the way around fairly.
I guess AP gets the "star" treatment already, and isn't held by the nasty ol' rulebook.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
16 years ago

I guess rules arn't enforced all the way around fairly.
I guess AP gets the "star" treatment already, and isn't held by the nasty ol' rulebook.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Cheese, as our (for now) "unofficial" elected official, why don't you you take a moment to act as our "counter-parlimentarian" with Formo? HE's the one whippin' out rule-books! (SEE HIS LAST POST IN THIS THREAD :icon_smile: )
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
Oh please, Adrian removed his helmet twice on the field that should have been flagged. Still wouldn't have made a difference.

Adrian Peterson had our number, period. Nothing was going to change that, no excuse, no flag, no nothing. Maybe a broken leg, that's it.

Get over it already. (says the guy who's still pissed about the Titans loss)
UserPostedImage
Packnic
16 years ago
Both of those bogus made and unmade calls hurt us.


but its not gonna change anything at all. we still lost. they won one game out of the last 6... i say let em have this one. we don't want to make our domination too obvious.
blank
Packnic
16 years ago

Oh please, Adrian removed his helmet twice on the field that should have been flagged. Still wouldn't have made a difference.

Adrian Peterson had our number, period. Nothing was going to change that, no excuse, no flag, no nothing. Maybe a broken leg, that's it.

Get over it already. (says the guy who's still pissed about the Titans loss)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




so you don't think them kicking from their own 15 for our 2 minute drill would have made a difference?
blank
dfosterf
16 years ago
If we had scored a touchdown, gotten ahead, but called for a helmet coming off with a little over 2 minutes to go, kicked from the 15, lost the game to a field goal... Someone would be mad. Mad at our player. Mad at our coaches. It didn't happen, to us or them. I'll go back to the golf analogy. There is a fine line between hero and goat. I don't much give a damn about the "no call". They cleaned our clocks, period. This board would be whistling a little bit different tune about our players, coaches and penalties had they made that call and a different outcome ensued...I'm just sayin' ...
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (16h) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Ravens still alive, but barely
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA
Mucky Tundra (19h) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Time to make dinner
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (19h) : DAGGER
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : pass plays
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire
Mucky Tundra (19h) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Do or die time for the Rams
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Kicking field goals are impressive
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh that might be a backbreaker
Mucky Tundra (20h) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Kicking doesn't make much sense
Mucky Tundra (20h) : If the Rams score a TD on the upcoming drive, they go for 2, right?
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Stafford is pretty good with 4th quarter comebacks. I would like to see it.
Mucky Tundra (20h) : YUGE stand by the Rams D there
Mucky Tundra (20h) : killer penalty!
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Philly has to go for this right?
Mucky Tundra (20h) : FUMBLE
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : pre-safety
TheKanataThrilla (20h) : Hurts being a gamer, that tackle on him looked painful on his knee
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Ooo a safety! Things are getting spicy
Martha Careful (20h) : quick analysis, Philly Oline, for the most part, is what our Oline should strive to be
Zero2Cool (21h) : I just saw score. Teams are really struggling with place kicks.
Martha Careful (22h) : nevermind...its on NBC
Martha Careful (22h) : does anyone have a thread to a broadcast? I do not have Peacock.
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Baltimore-Buffalo line has been BAL -1 to -1.5. Gotta be rare that a divisional home team that won 13 games is an underdog at home
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : Ironically, our QB played the best of all 3
beast (19-Jan) : 0-3 NFC North Dominated the Regular season and shutout in the post season
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Burn Detroit to the ground over losing to the Commanders? Bit extreme
packerfanoutwest (19-Jan) : Burn your city Lion fans!!
packerfanoutwest (19-Jan) : suck it lions!!!
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Knew that playoffs loss for the Lions would hit like crack but I could absolutely OD on this
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Gonna sleep better after that game
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : goodnight!
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : goodnight
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : (not you Martha, it's a saying lol)
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : America loves an underdog
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That'll do pig, that'll do
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : 4 turnovers by Goff
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : that INT was definately on Goff!
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : we arent the only guys who blow contain
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : it should be 4th down
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : I can't blame the call, Ijust would have gone for it
Martha Careful (19-Jan) : miss
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : I had the feeling he was gonna miss
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : The football gods chortled
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

54m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

19-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.