Greg C.
14 years ago
Here's a good article from Ann Killion, who is based in San Francisco, about what it's like to be a 49ers fan watching Aaron Rodgers right now:

49ers fans watch in agony as local boy Rodgers stars for Packers

If, over the weekend, you heard a god-awful noise coming from the direction of the setting sun, don't worry.

That was just the moaning, teeth-grinding and stomach-churning coming from Northern California, while Aaron Rodgers was ascending to the pantheon of NFL greats.

It's a complicated relationship the top half of California has with Rodgers, one that was expressed on Twitter and Facebook on Saturday night in the wake of Rodgers' near-flawless performance in Green Bay's convincing win over Atlanta. Bursting with pride over a native son. Cursing the fact that he isn't blossoming near home. Packer green with envy, 49ers scarlet with frustration.

Rodgers, of course, is the man the 49ers didn't want. Six years ago, the 49ers chose Alex Smith with the first pick of the 2005 draft. And Rodgers sat. And sat. And sat some more, all alone in the green room, until he was finally selected by the Green Bay Packers with the 24th pick.

The sense then was that, despite the agonizing wait, the local boy got the better deal, going to an established franchise to wait his turn behind a legend.

The sense now? It was an even better deal than we thought at the time. Rodgers' emerging greatness is a direct result of not being a 49er.

The knee-jerk reaction is that the 49ers fate was sealed that day. If they had picked Rodgers over Smith everything would be rainbows and lemon drops now, instead of starting over again with their third coach and no discernible starting quarterback six years later.

But that's not true. Rodgers is a far superior player to Smith and has a stronger personality. But the 49ers problems were too twisted for one young quarterback to unravel.

Would Rodgers have survived six offensive coordinators? In the 49ers fans alternate universe, Mike McCarthy doesn't depart after the 2005 season, instead replaces a fired Mike Nolan and installs his version of the West Coast offense in San Francisco. Couldn't have happened: Nolan had the keys to the 49ers kingdom for a few more years.

Would Rodgers have survived being forced directly into the starting lineup, rather than wait his turn behind a veteran? Smith -- already handicapped by not coming out of a pro-style college offense -- became an immediate starter, behind a terrible offensive line. Rodgers, despite the passion play that ensued with Brett Favre, benefited from sitting. And, it must be noted, was fortunate that the legend he replaced quickly wore out his welcome around the league so that Packers fans weren't pining for Favre and, instead, smartly accepted Rodgers.

Would Rodgers have survived two head coaches, Nolan and Mike Singletary, who acted as though a quarterback was a foreign visitor they couldn't communicate with and barely tolerated? Not likely. A more plausible scenario would be that Rodgers would have been vocal about the problems with the defensive mindset and increasingly Neanderthal style of football. Rodgers probably wouldn't have renegotiated his contract as Smith did in 2009, to stay with the dysfunctional team and may have been cut, as Smith almost was.

So, no, that alternate universe could never have existed.
But it is puzzling to look back on the 49ers choice, one that seems so obviously wrong six years later.

Smith was slightly taller (two inches). Smith's stock rose before the draft, in the inexplicable ways that have to do with agents and "insider" buzz. The younger Smith was deemed more "coachable" and pliant by the 49ers -- he was willing to do a series of oddball tasks like hop on one foot without questioning why Nolan was asking him to do so (note: pliant is not a good quality in quarterbacks). Rodgers, in contrast, was viewed as cocky (note: cocky is a good quality in quarterbacks). Smith's college coach, Urban Meyer, was the next big thing while Rodgers' coach, Jeff Tedford, was best known for grooming quarterbacks like Kyle Boller and Akili Smith, who turned into first-round busts.

But the biggest issue was that Rodgers was right there, right under the 49ers nose, and wanted to play for the 49ers. Somehow that made him less desirable for a new regime determined to do things its own way.
Rodgers had been passed over before. He grew up in Chico, Calif., halfway between the Bay Area and the Oregon border. Overlooked by Division I schools, he went to Butte Community College, where Tedford stumbled upon him while scouting another player.

Rodgers played two years at Cal, and was instrumental in helping to turn the program around. He played in 2003 and 2004, set several school records and only lost to USC in his final season. Rodgers left with one year of eligibility remaining. Tedford has struggled to develop another effective quarterback ever since.

Now Rodgers is on the brink of leading the Packers to a Super Bowl. Green Bay may be in the process of accomplishing something only the 49ers have managed to do in the modern era: replace a legendary quarterback with another legend. Rodgers isn't quite there yet, but he looks the part.
And the 49ers? They've never recovered from their draft day mistake. But picking Smith over Rodgers is just one of many miscues the team is trying to rectify, having hired an offensive mind in Jim Harbaugh to oversee yet another do-over.

It's tempting to say that the fate of two teams was sealed on April 23, 2005. But it's not that simple.



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/ann_killion/01/18/aaron-rodgers/index.html#ixzz1BX9ezYdn 
blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I can't keep adding the quotes to your stuff, can you quote the article to disassociate your words, from that of you which you copied please? 🙂
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

I can't keep adding the quotes to your stuff, can you quote the article to disassociate your words, from that of you which you copied please? :)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



What's the standard? Do I have to put quotation marks in front of every single paragraph? Maybe I should just provide the link and be done with it. That's what I used to do, but then some people complain because they don't like to go to a link.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Just put the article in

tags. Or use the UserPostedImage button.

By the way, how is this for a line of revisionist history?

And, it must be noted, was fortunate that the legend he replaced quickly wore out his welcome around the league so that Packers fans weren't pining for Favre and, instead, smartly accepted Rodgers.



Some were, sure. I'm not convinced a majority were.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

What's the standard? Do I have to put quotation marks in front of every single paragraph? Maybe I should just provide the link and be done with it. That's what I used to do, but then some people complain because they don't like to go to a link.

"Greg C." wrote:



Wow, wasn't expecting a response like that from you.

If you highlight the contents of the article, then click the UserPostedImage icon and it'll put it in a quote that will separate your words, from the article.

It only takes a brief second and prevents the poster from appearing as someone who plagiarized.

And I do appreciate you (and others) posting the full articles accompanied with the source link.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

Just put the article in quote tags. Or use the UserPostedImage button.

By the way, how is this for a line of revisionist history?

And, it must be noted, was fortunate that the legend he replaced quickly wore out his welcome around the league so that Packers fans weren't pining for Favre and, instead, smartly accepted Rodgers.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Some were, sure. I'm not convinced a majority were.



Hey, it worked, though it took me awhile to find that icon. It's buried in amongst all the others, right next to the all-important skull and crossbones. Thanks for your patience, guys. I'm no good at this computer stuff.

As for your comment, Nonstop, I wouldn't call it revisionist history, but she is definitely glossing over a complicated situation there. In the context of the article, I can see why she did it. And I think that for the most part, the fans did accept Rodgers. As much division as there was among fans, it could've been much, much worse than it was, especially when viewed by an outsider.

Here's the part of the article that I found most interesting:

The younger Smith was deemed more "coachable" and pliant by the 49ers -- he was willing to do a series of oddball tasks like hop on one foot without questioning why Nolan was asking him to do so (note: pliant is not a good quality in quarterbacks). Rodgers, in contrast, was viewed as cocky (note: cocky is a good quality in quarterbacks).


blank
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Thank you Greg C.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
That may be true, but I do wonder how many quarterbacks have been booed in their first start or told they suck by little kids.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

That may be true, but I do wonder how many quarterbacks have been booed in their first start or told they suck by little kids.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Who was booed on their first start?
UserPostedImage
RaiderPride
14 years ago
ZERO.

You are a brilliant computer mind.

Some of us loyal members have far less knowledge. It is indeed a challenge for us. This is not a huge thing, and it most likely has to do with age, and or the work we do.

Greg C wrote:

Hey, it worked, though it took me awhile to find that icon. It's buried in amongst all the others, right next to the all-important skull and crossbones. Thanks for your patience, guys. I'm no good at this computer stuff.



Zero.... You took the time to explain this to Peons like Greg and I in this comment. I just tried the quote icon...

I hope it works.

Always remember.. Not everyone is as smart as you are. And I mean that sincerely. Be slow... explain some things like you were talking to a two year old.
""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (27m) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.
Mucky Tundra (10h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh
dfosterf (11h) : Happy Birthday Dave!
Mucky Tundra (12h) : happy birthday dhazer
TheKanataThrilla (14h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!
buckeyepackfan (14h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : well, he was
TheKanataThrilla (14h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL
Mucky Tundra (15h) : I think this games over
beast (15h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs
Mucky Tundra (15h) : This game looks too big for Washington
packerfanoutwest (19h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
packerfanoutwest (19h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
packerfanoutwest (19h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
20m / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.