Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Eagles
Falcons
Bears (snicker)
Patriots

"wpr" wrote:



Kind of neat we have the chance to "avenge" a few losses.
UserPostedImage
blueleopard
14 years ago
Yes, I want revenge against Atlanta. If we beat Atlanta, the NFC Championship is ours. It's that simple.

In the AFC, even though I'd love to kick Tom Brady's ass, I want Pittsburgh. That game last year where Roethislberger beat us at the last second and threw for 500 yards? Bullshit.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago

Yes, I want revenge against Atlanta. If we beat Atlanta, the NFC Championship is ours. It's that simple.

In the AFC, even though I'd love to kick Tom Brady's ass, I want Pittsburgh. That game last year where Roethislberger beat us at the last second and threw for 500 yards? Bullshit.

"blueleopard" wrote:



I want to be the best the AFC has to offer. I don't want anyone to say GB lucked out and had to face a lesser team in the SB (like when they faced NE instead of Denver). THAT is bullshit.
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
14 years ago

Yes, I want revenge against Atlanta. If we beat Atlanta, the NFC Championship is ours. It's that simple.

In the AFC, even though I'd love to kick Tom Brady's ass, I want Pittsburgh. That game last year where Roethislberger beat us at the last second and threw for 500 yards? Bullshit.

"wpr" wrote:



I want to be the best the AFC has to offer. I don't want anyone to say GB lucked out and had to face a lesser team in the SB (like when they faced NE instead of Denver). THAT is bullshit.

"blueleopard" wrote:



The same would be said about the Packers if we were to make the SB. We are the #6 WC team. All things considered to other fans and other teams, the Packers are not the best team in the NFC. We know that we have lost 6 games by a total of 20 points and can therefore be considered among the top, but the fact is that anybody, if asked, would say that Atlanta is better than GB because (as Zero2Cool said earlier this season) if they have a better record and won head to head, it is as simple as that. They are better. If we were to make the playoffs, we would be the "lesser team" from the NFC.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
If I remember correctly, the Packers have already made the playoffs. :scratch:
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago

Yes, I want revenge against Atlanta. If we beat Atlanta, the NFC Championship is ours. It's that simple.

In the AFC, even though I'd love to kick Tom Brady's ass, I want Pittsburgh. That game last year where Roethislberger beat us at the last second and threw for 500 yards? Bullshit.

"peteralan71" wrote:



I want to be the best the AFC has to offer. I don't want anyone to say GB lucked out and had to face a lesser team in the SB (like when they faced NE instead of Denver). THAT is bullshit.

"wpr" wrote:



The same would be said about the Packers if we were to make the SB. We are the #6 WC team. All things considered to other fans and other teams, the Packers are not the best team in the NFC. We know that we have lost 6 games by a total of 20 points and can therefore be considered among the top, but the fact is that anybody, if asked, would say that Atlanta is better than GB because (as Zero2Cool said earlier this season) if they have a better record and won head to head, it is as simple as that. They are better. If we were to make the playoffs, we would be the "lesser team" from the NFC.

"blueleopard" wrote:



point taken. but I don't care what other fans say if they have to face GB. We are there.
It is no stretch of the imagination to say GB could have been 13-3
Chicago game 1
Washington
Miami
Detroit
just 3 of the 4. (I'll ignore Atl and NE for conversation sake.)
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
14 years ago
I agree completely. Like I said in my little rant before, we fans know how good the Packers are because we live and breathe Green Bay, so we will never fully believe that we are underdogs or are a lesser team. So that is no different than us looking at any team in the AFC that are not the Patriots as a lesser team. We have not spent hours pouring over their stats like we have for the Packers. What I am trying to get at is basically the same things that NSD said. We are in the playoffs, and we are able to beat any team in the playoffs. The same might be said for many teams on the AFC side of the bracket, so if we are fortunate enough to make it to the SB, I don't care who we beat, it shouldn't be overlooked, because the other team earned their way there just like us.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago
Well it has to be Atlanta after the first round because we're the #6 seed.

After that I hope its the Seahawks because that would be the easiest. I guess I'm a coward but I want the easiest road possible, haha. I don't want to go into Chicago, we barely won at home against the Bears and they had nothing to play for. I don't want to go into New Oreleans either.

Then I want to the Chiefs or Jets. I want no part of the Pats in the Super Bowl or the Steelers or the Ravens or the Colts for that matter.

So

Seahawks in NFCCG
Chiefs or Jets in SB
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Well it has to be Atlanta after the first round because we're the #6 seed.

After that I hope its the Seahawks because that would be the easiest. I guess I'm a coward but I want the easiest road possible, haha. I don't want to go into Chicago, we barely won at home against the Bears and they had nothing to play for. I don't want to go into New Oreleans either.

Then I want to the Chiefs or Jets. I want no part of the Pats in the Super Bowl or the Steelers or the Ravens or the Colts for that matter.

So

Seahawks in NFCCG
Chiefs or Jets in SB

"RedSoxExcel" wrote:



Heh. What if we play the Jets again in the SB and shut them out again. Has there ever been a shutout in the SB? I don't think there ever has been one.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago


Heh. What if we play the Jets again in the SB and shut them out again. Has there ever been a shutout in the SB? I don't think there ever has been one.

"zombieslayer" wrote:




nope. 3 points is the least.

Super Bowl VI
Jan. 16, 1972
Tulane Stadium
New Orleans, Louisiana
MVP: Roger Staubach, QB, Dallas
Dallas Cowboys 24
Miami Dolphins 3
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (1h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (3h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (14h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (19h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
7m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

21h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.