macbob
14 years ago


But Zombie throws stats like candy on a playground.. I can throw stats out back that support the element of my stance.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



And this is why I'm done arguing this argument.

I did a shitload of research analyzing what it takes to win the Super Bowl. It started with Raider Pride saying "Defense wins Championships" and in the effort to prove him wrong, I proved him right. I found that if we take all the stats there are, the one that had the highest rates of a SB winning team is the #1 D.

Then I found what is more effective - an elite QB or an elite RB. It became obvious an elite QB was more effective and it wasn't even close. I proved all this with hours of research. This stuff isn't exactly easy to do.

In fact, it was so skewed that my conclusion was #1 D is the #1 qualifier for winning the SB. 2nd is an elite QB who doesn't throw INTs in important games. The elite RB couldn't even be considered because it didn't matter. In fact, the elite RB didn't have that much bearing on a team's record, period.

Now if you want to take all the research I've done and just say I'm throwing stats around without any meaning, then you can take my college degree too and I must have apparently paid off my professors as well as I apparently don't know what I'm doing with research, right?

Do you even realize how condescending what you said is? I actually take pride in what I'm doing here. I find football fascinating and would like to believe I'm a contributing member to this forum.

"Pack93z" wrote:



Zombie-

Your analysis above looks spot on to me. D's the #1 factor, followed by a good QB.

Not looking for the elite RB that you mention above (though I'd love to have one...there's examples throughout, such as Denver, where John Elway was not able to win the SB until he had Terrell Davis to take someof the offensive load off of him.)

I'm not looking for the Packers to become primarily a running team. Just want the Pack to run the ball enough to attract the defenses attention and distract them from our passing game, so that they're not loading up all of the time after the QB.

Running 13 times a game (like we did in two early losses) is not enough to attract the D's attention. I thought Mike McCarthy called a pretty good game against NE and NYG, mixing in enough runs to get the D's attention and open up the passing game. I'd be happy with a 35 pass/25 run ratio.

I greatly enjoy your analysis and discussions. Packz is just yanking your chain--you Maddenite. :icon_smile:
Pack93z
14 years ago



However, I will also say that more emphasis on the run has seemed to work better for the Packers this year. Maybe it's because the O-line is just not stout enough to pass protect on play after play when the defense is expecting the pass. Maybe it's because our receivers can't get open consistently enough for that kind of offense to work.

"Greg C." wrote:



Agreed.. I don't want a run based team.. but I want a team that looks like the past two weeks.. run enough to setup the pass and shred them with it.

Nothing more..

I posted my thoughts on why run to help the offense enough.. this is it to a tee.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago

Zombie.. it was intended to be a joke.. if it offended I am truly sorry.

My comment was meant in the number of statistical numbers you put up was extensive..

I apologize once again if I offended and sounded condescending.. that was not the intent.

I understand your frustration with the stats.. I littered this thread and the playground thread with stats countering the pass heavy ratio but they are ignored as well.

Last two games I have been happy with the mix and the amount of totes.. but I took a bit of offense to being told that basically I am blind with what I see.. then post a visual and get told again that they didn't bite.


But I did not intent to come off as condescending. I was wrong again in that matter in my framing of my post.

"Pack93z" wrote:




UserPostedImage
UserPostedImage

:onfloor: ::razz:
UserPostedImage
dhpackr
14 years ago
I'd like to see Kuhn have more opportunities @ halfback with Quinn Johnson as his lead blocker!
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
The rules in the NFL make it easier for their to be an Elite QB than an Elite RB, was that factored into your research?
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
link 


The Green Bay Packers' running game hasn't been great the past two games, but it's at least been good enough to take some of the burden off quarterbacks Aaron Rodgers and Matt Flynn.

The Packers ran the ball a season-high 38 times for 143 yards (3.8 average) during a 31-27 loss to New England two weeks ago with Flynn starting in place of Rodgers, who was sidelined by a concussion. Green Bay had 35 rushing attempts for 119 yards (3.4 average) during a 45-17 victory over the New York Giants last week with Rodgers back in the lineup.

Packers coach Mike McCarthy's faith in the running game has come a long way since a 20-17 loss to the Chicago Bears in Week 3, when the Packers registered a season-low 15 rushing attempts, two of which were scrambles by Rodgers. McCarthy called passes on 78 percent of the plays that Monday night at Soldier Field.

Expect that ratio to be closer to 50-50 when the Packers (9-6) and Bears (11-4) meet again Sunday at Lambeau Field.

"When our attempts are where they have been the last couple weeks, that's the vision of the offense," McCarthy said. "The vision of the offense is not to go out and line up with five wide receivers for 35 snaps. That's not what we're trying to do here.

"I think sometimes that's what people try to say that's what we're trying to do here. I think the quarterbacks and receivers like to do that. But this is not a game of seven-on-seven. It's a game that starts at the line of scrimmage, and it's important to the success of the quarterback which the system is ultimately built around, making him successful that you need to run the ball."

Rodgers was very successful against the Giants, completing 25 of 37 passes for a career-high 404 yards with four touchdowns and no interceptions for a passer rating of 139.9.

According to ESPN's Stats & Information, Rodgers was 11 of 12 for 241 yards with three touchdowns a perfect 158.3 passer rating on play-action passes against the Giants. The play-action fakes were effective because the Giants had to respect the Packers' running game, which produced just enough to warrant attention.

John Kuhn opened the game with a 5-yard run and Brandon Jackson followed with four yards on the next play. The series eventually ended with a punt, but Rodgers hit wide receiver Jordy Nelson for an 80-yard score on the opening play of the second series after Giants safety Antrel Rolle bit on a fake handoff to Jackson.

Backup halfback Dimitri Nance opened the next series with two runs for a combined 11 yards to spark a 10-play drive that ended with a field goal.

"If we can get the ball where it's second-and-6, Mike has a lot of good calls on that sheet," Packers offensive coordinator Joe Philbin said. "A bunch of good ones. Second-and-12, there's still some good ones, but not as many."

Rodgers also had completions of 38 yards to Nelson, 33 to Donald Driver, 26 and 24 to Greg Jennings and 16 to Andrew Quarless off play-action fakes against the Giants. A 5-yard touchdown pass to Kuhn was set up by a fake, as was a 1-yard touchdown pass to tight end Donald Lee.

"We have action passing plays in the plan every week," Packers quarterbacks coach Tom Clements said. "And obviously if you get the running game going, the defense has to react a little bit more to the run fake and you get the opportunity for big chunks of yards. I think it's an important part of our thought process."

Rodgers finished with 45 pass attempts against the Bears on Sept. 27. He completed 75.6 percent of those attempts for 316 yards, but the Packers managed just two touchdowns and a field goal despite gaining 376 yards and holding the ball for 35 minutes, 49 seconds.

Clements thought Rodgers did a good job of staying patient and taking what the Bears gave him.

"That's a large part of it," Clements said. "Because when teams play that, they're trying to take away the easy passes and still prevent the down-the-field throws. You have to be patient; you've got to make sure you're making the right decisions. And if the opportunity is there to make the downfield throw, take it, but don't get bored just taking easy completions."

The Packers averaged 4.2 yards per carry against the Bears, with three runs of 11 yards or longer. But Green Bay went long stretches without running the ball, which showed how little McCarthy trusted the ground game.

Clearly, his attitude has changed as the Packers reach the end of the regular season.

"You have to honor the run now," said Jackson, who leads the Packers with 684 yards. "You just can't disregard it now. We're at a stage now where we're running the ball, eating up clock, and if you don't honor it, we'll get you."


UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago


According to ESPN's Stats & Information, Rodgers was 11 of 12 for 241 yards with three touchdowns a perfect 158.3 passer rating on play-action passes against the Giants. The play-action fakes were effective because the Giants had to respect the Packers' running game, which produced just enough to warrant attention.

"wpr" wrote:



A few more than I had counted.. but it definitely was effective.

Thanks WPR.. +1
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

A few more than I had counted.. but it definitely was effective.

Thanks WPR.. +1

"Pack93z" wrote:



Should have taken your socks an sho.....nm
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago
What.. the left one has five toes as well.. kind of webbed and rubberier.. but toes no less. lol.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

What.. the left one has five toes as well.. kind of webbed and rubberier.. but toes no less. lol.

"Pack93z" wrote:

hah thats hot
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (6h) : meh
Zero2Cool (10h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (10h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (10h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (14h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (14h) : Only 4
wpr (14h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (16h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (17h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.