macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
Matt Bowen, National Football Post, had an intersting article on the Cover 2 defense. In the article he had a link to the cover 2 itself, and then to analysis on how to beat the cover 2.

I'd be interested in those more knowledgeable about the subject whether his analysis is any good or if he's full of stuffing.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Rodgers-vs-the-Bears-Cover-2-defense-4869.html 

Aaron Rodgers is going to see the Cover 2 defense from Lovie Smiths Bears this Sunday up at Lambeau Field. No matter what is said throughout this week about the Chicago zone pressure schemesor their cornerbacks in Cover 1the Packers will see plenty of the 2-deep shell.

What does that mean for the Green Bay QB? Lets look at five things that will have an impact in this crucial Sunday matchup.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Inside-the-playbook-the-Tampa-2.html  -- chalkboard breakdown of the Cover 2 defense.

1. Work for the deep ball: That is the theory behind the defense. Make Rodgers take the underneath throws. The Bears want to get a jam on No.1 and re-route the receiver on an inside release. Give the safety a cushion and play with enough depth to take away the deep 9 (fade), post and the 7 (flag) when the corner sinks at a 45-degree angle. If Rodgers wants to take the check downgive it to him. But make him work to fit the ball into tight holes down the field.

2. Targeting Urlacher: Cover 2 is a 3-deep, 4-under coverage in the NFL when the Mike Backer runs the inside vertical seam. The Packers can align in their empty sets with a WR at No.3 (think Greg Jennings, Jordy Nelson) or in their pro sets with the TE to test the middle of the field. Urlacher will open his hips to the passing strength and carry that vertical route. Both safeties will drive on the throwbut the matchup can be ideal for Green Bay. Get Urlacher running down the field with his back to the QB. A tough play for any linebacker.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Inside-the-playbook-defeating-the-Tampa-2.html  Expect to see these basic Cover 2 beaters in the Packers game plan: 4 verticals, flat-7, the dagger (inside seam, dig combo), OVS (outside vertical stretch: 9, 7, flat combo) and the deep 15-yard dig. Every offense will carry these routes in their playbook when they play the Bears. My guess? Look for 4 verticals (4 go routes) early in the game near mid-field. The same route scheme that resulted in touchdowns for Tom Brady and Brett Favre this season vs. Lovies defense.

4. Long drives: This is what Chicago wants to see. Very similar to their first meeting on Monday night at Soldier Field. Force Rodgers to throw the short to intermediate route tree and put together 10-12 play drives. Why? More opportunity for the offense to make a mistake. Penalties, turnovers and the basic idea that offensive play callers get impatientand start to take too much risk. Every Cover 2 coach I played for in the NFL believed in this theory. Make the offense work the ball down the field and you will make a play on defense.

5. Moving the underneath coverage: This will come into play more in 3rd and medium situations. Rodgers has to use his eyes to move Bears LB Lance Briggs and nickel back D.J. Moore. They are coached to drop to their landmarks (between the numbers and the hash marks) and drive on the throw. Think of Derrick Brooks back in his playing days for the Bucs. An elite player for this reason. Read the QB and drive from the backside to cut off any route breaking to the middle of the field. Cant let Moore and Briggs make plays on Sunday.

NationalFootballPost.com wrote:

tonyagnese
14 years ago
Long drives, while difficult, are certainly achievable.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago

4. Long drives: This is what Chicago wants to see. Very similar to their first meeting on Monday night at Soldier Field. Force Rodgers to throw the short to intermediate route tree and put together 10-12 play drives. Why? More opportunity for the offense to make a mistake. Penalties, turnovers and the basic idea that offensive play callers get impatientand start to take too much risk. Every Cover 2 coach I played for in the NFL believed in this theory. Make the offense work the ball down the field and you will make a play on defense.



Funny, I always thought that the O was trying to get long drives. Yet here, they're saying Cover 2 Ds want long drives because it gives them a chance for a play.

Well, I guess don't make mistakes Packers O.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

4. Long drives: This is what Chicago wants to see. Very similar to their first meeting on Monday night at Soldier Field. Force Rodgers to throw the short to intermediate route tree and put together 10-12 play drives. Why? More opportunity for the offense to make a mistake. Penalties, turnovers and the basic idea that offensive play callers get impatientand start to take too much risk. Every Cover 2 coach I played for in the NFL believed in this theory. Make the offense work the ball down the field and you will make a play on defense.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Funny, I always thought that the O was trying to get long drives. Yet here, they're saying Cover 2 Ds want long drives because it gives them a chance for a play.

Well, I guess don't make mistakes Packers O.



Z-that's one part of his analysis that I thought was poorly worded, at best.

I would have worded it more along the lines...the goal is to prevent the deep strike, thus forcing the offense to drive down the field, with the defense hopefully being able to put pressure on the offense and force a mistake--dropped pass, penalty or turnover (INT or fumble).

Becuase I would agree with the statement (as a general principle) of driving down the field, keeping the opposing teams offense sitting on the sidelines for long periods. When they do get on thefield, they won't be in any kind of rhythm and hopefullly our D can force a 3-and-out, putting their offense back on their keisters on the sidelines.

That's exactly what we did to NE, and sidelines is exactlly where we wanted their offense. It led to a 40/20 time of possession advantage for the Pack. Unfortunately, due to breakdowns in other areas we weren't able to pull the game out, but came close.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (16m) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (16m) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Rude!
beast (4h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (10h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (12h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
14m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.