Porn / Sexting· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

Does murder in movies increase the number of murders?

Why are we so worried about people watching sex, which is totally legal, and yet have no problem letting them watch murder and mutilation, which are illegal?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Why are we asking why people are so worried about people watching sex when no one mentioned anything of the sort? Oh, yeah, you just can't let a fucking threat takes it course.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#12

PLEASE NO ONE WATCH PORN OMG THE WORLD WILL COME TO AN END!!

There Rourke, NOW ask your stupid question.

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#13

OK, a more in depth answer for Zero - porn is a thought crime. God forbid my wife has a fantasy.

Sexting I guess could be weird, but it's still not going to get me a disease. If a stalker results, then we got a problem. Cheating is a physical act, not a thought. If cheating was a thought, I'd be in serious trouble. I'd also be a murderer every time I drive. 😉

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Porforis
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#14

Sexting. The difference between porn and sexting is about the equivalent of checking out other women that are walking by and cheating on your wife with them.

dhpackr
Registered

14 years ago

#15

Probably a better question Zero is what percentage of women porn stars were molested or raped?

"DakotaT" wrote:

why is this a better question?

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

djcubez
Senior Member

14 years ago

#16

Sexting = texting sexual comments to another person, e.g. "i want you to touch my dong" or "i wanna motor boat your Himalayas!", sending pictures of gentiles.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Would you care to explain to me why sending pictures of non-Jewish people to your friends is sexual?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#17

OK, a more in depth answer for Zero - porn is a thought crime. God forbid my wife has a fantasy.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Why forbid your wife from having a fantasy? That's pretty damn selfish if you ask me. I sure as hell bet you have many fantasies. If she wants to watch porn, so be it. It's WATCHING for cripes sake. Hell, she'd probably rather watch it with you than a lone if you had the balls to ask.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#18

Probably a better question Zero is what percentage of women porn stars were molested or raped?

"dhpackr" wrote:

why is this a better question?

"DakotaT" wrote:

I think you already KNOW the answer.
Most women involved in that were molested in some way. Thus, their lack of self asteem that makes them lower themselves to be used as a sex toy.
True, not all women in porn have been molested, but way too high a number have been, thus their allowing themselves to be further "abused".

But i know you are a smart cookie, and just wanted someone to put it down in words........probably so you can blast whoever was dumb enough to answer in the first place....hey......that's ME!!!! LOL!

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#19

Most women involved in that were molested in some way.

"Cheesey" wrote:

I would love to see some citations backing this statement up.

DakotaT
Select Member

14 years ago

#20

Most women involved in that were molested in some way.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I would love to see some citations backing this statement up.

"Cheesey" wrote:

Cheesey and I don't need stats, we just know shit.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (38m) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (22h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (22h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22