pack93z made the point I was trying to make. Just brining attention to the fact that his stats are a little misleading, not trying to re-write the books. I never once said we need to discredit him for his 71 yarder, just that it provides a misleading picture of the production we typically see from Bjack.
My original point was to dispute the first point brought up. Someone mentioned if we give the ball to Jackson more, he could have 1,300 all purpose yards. Well big deal, of course we could force feed it to him 40 times/game and he'll have some production, but does saying that you have a 1,000 yard back on your team imply that our running situation is fixed or its the best course of action?
No, that STAT (1k yards) does not a great back make. The team needs a legitimate play maker, and as has been brought up by many, BJack is not that homerun threat, he's really not even someone the team has been able to count on for short yardage situations...that's the point of HIGHLIGTHING, NOT re-writing the statistics.