wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago


MJS link 
There are a lot of ways to measure the competence of a defense, and the National Football League's army of statisticians has got them covered.

Yards per rush. Opponent passer rating. Red-zone defense. Quarterback hits. Third-down conversion percentage. Takeaways.

Really, though, only one statistic directly affects the outcome of games: points allowed. It's first-grade math. The fewer points a defense gives up, the better the chance its team will win.

Scoring defense is an area in which the Green Bay Packers have excelled and it has been instrumental in their four-game winning steak and 7-3 record, tied for second-best in the NFC.

When it comes to giving up points, the Packers and Chicago Bears are the stingiest teams in the NFL. Each has allowed 146 points in 10 games (14.6 average); the Pittsburgh Steelers rank third at 165 (16.5).

But Green Bay leads the league with only 14 touchdowns allowed, two fewer than the Steelers. And the defense wasn't responsible for Devin Hester's 62-yard punt return for a touchdown Sept. 27.

Thirteen touchdowns in 10 games? But wait, it gets better. The Packers have allowed only four defensive touchdowns in five road games.

"If they can't get in the end zone, they can't win," said safety Nick Collins. "That's our motto."

What's remarkable is that the Packers have accomplished this with a non-drafted rookie starting at outside linebacker (Frank Zombo), a non-drafted rookie playing nickel cornerback (Sam Shields), a midseason waiver acquisition playing extensively at defensive end (Howard Green) and career backups starting at inside linebacker (Desmond Bishop) and strong safety (Charlie Peprah).

It's a testament to defensive coordinator Dom Capers and his assistants that the Packers have overcome injuries to key players and have continued to improve each week.

The coaches have a knack for putting players in positions to succeed in terms of scheme, covering up individual weaknesses with team strengths.

"We've got a group of guys that are doing a good job of communicating," Capers said. "They're getting a feel for each other. They're playing well together. That's what it takes to play good team defense.

"I think there's a confidence level to where guys know they can count on the guy next to them to take care of his job, his gap responsibility, and consequently guys play faster."

The Packers have been off-the-charts good the last three games, shutting out the New York Jets on the road, 9-0; stifling Dallas, 45-7, at home, and on Sunday limiting Minnesota to a field goal in a 31-3 victory at the Metrodome.

The three-game averages: 3.3 points, 83.6 rushing yards, 204.6 passing yards and 288.3 total yards.

Maybe it's time people started talking about the Packers' defense as one of the best in the NFL.

Green Bay ranks 12th in total defense (323.4) but is tied for third in sacks (29), tied for second in interceptions (15) and is No. 2 in opponents' quarterback rating (66.5).

The Packers held Minnesota's Adrian Peterson to 72 yards (25 of them on one carry), harassed Brett Favre into an inconsistent 17-for-38, 208-yard day and came up with two huge second-quarter turnovers.

"I think our formula right now, with the offense not turning the ball over, the special teams giving us better field position on both sides of the ball and then our ability to take the ball away, that all fits together," Capers said. "Over the years, that's normally a winning formula."

Coach Mike McCarthy said the defense's performance against Minnesota graded out as its finest of the year.

"Our defense is in excellent rhythm as far as the communication, tackling, playing with the fundamentals, getting in and out of the personnel groups, the ability to play an approximate 40-60 pressure-coverage ratio," McCarthy said. "It gives you the ability to play fast.

"We're in Year 2 (of the 3-4 alignment under Capers). There's an excellent understanding. I'm very happy with the progress we've made and with where we are on defense."

The Packers also have made big improvements in their red-zone defense, which has been another area of emphasis. Capers said the defense was playing more zone coverage and avoiding unfavorable man-on-man matchups.

There is no denying the Packers' success, but they have not yet faced a red-hot quarterback this season. In 2009, a seemingly stout Green Bay defense was exposed down the stretch by Pittsburgh's Ben Roethlisberger, who completed 29 for 46 for 503 yards and three touchdowns.

Then, in a 51-45 overtime playoff loss to Arizona, Kurt Warner completed 29 of 33 for 379 yards and five touchdowns.

With that in mind, the Packers' defense faces a big test Sunday in Atlanta. The Falcons are an NFC-best 8-2 and their quarterback, Matt Ryan, has been impressive.

Ryan has completed 238 of 377 passes (63.1%) for 2,518 yards, with 18 touchdowns and five interceptions. His numbers are similar to those of the Packers' Aaron Rodgers, who has completed 214 of 334 (64.1%) for 2,601 yards, with 19 touchdowns and nine interceptions.

It's unrealistic to expect the Packers to pitch a shutout. But that's their goal.

"We've constantly tried to sell that our No. 1 goal is to keep people out of the end zone because it gives you the best chance of winning," Capers said. "It's interesting to see people start to take pride in those things."



STINGY ALLOWANCE

NFL leaders in fewest points allowed:

Green Bay Packers 	146
Chicago Bears 	        146
Pittsburgh Steelers 	165
New Orleans Saints 	170
New York Jets 	        177
Baltimore Ravens 	178
Atlanta Falcons 	192
St. Louis Rams 	        198
Tennessee Titans 	198
Cleveland Browns 	206
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 	206 



While I agree with the concept that the fewest points is the best indicator there are a lot of other factors that go into it.

For example-
1. Did the offense turn the ball over at their own 20? (Can't blame the defense if the other team scores from there.)
2. Did the special teams allow a 60 yard punt return?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
or those stupid pass interference penalties that move the ball to the spot of the foul. I do not like that at all. It should be a 10 yard or 15 yard penalty.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

or those stupid pass interference penalties that move the ball to the spot of the foul. I do not like that at all. It should be a 10 yard or 15 yard penalty.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I could live with a rule like that. Works well enough in the college game.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
14 years ago
Does this count how many times the defense itself scores? We've had some pick 6's. Woody and Clay come to mind.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

Does this count how many times the defense itself scores? We've had some pick 6's. Woody and Clay come to mind.

"nerdmann" wrote:



nope this is talking about how many times GB has let the other team score. Not how many times they have scored.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago

or those stupid pass interference penalties that move the ball to the spot of the foul. I do not like that at all. It should be a 10 yard or 15 yard penalty.

"wpr" wrote:



I could live with a rule like that. Works well enough in the college game.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



DB's would abuse this. They would tackle a guy on any long ball to make a potential 30+ bomb into just a 10-15 yard penalty.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago

or those stupid pass interference penalties that move the ball to the spot of the foul. I do not like that at all. It should be a 10 yard or 15 yard penalty.

"djcubez" wrote:



I could live with a rule like that. Works well enough in the college game.

"wpr" wrote:



DB's would abuse this. They would tackle a guy on any long ball to make a potential 30+ bomb into just a 10-15 yard penalty.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



yep they would. just reload and run it again and again until they don't.
actually they would only do it if they got beat on the play.
So a team gets a new set of downs 10-15 yards down field that is not a crime. Sure beats seeing them get 30 when there is no way to know if the receiver would have even caught the ball. Even though it is the NFL and the player SHOULD catch the ball, there are an awful lot of dropped passes.
I hate it when the offense's big play is to throw down field and hope for the PI call from the ref.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago

or those stupid pass interference penalties that move the ball to the spot of the foul. I do not like that at all. It should be a 10 yard or 15 yard penalty.

"wpr" wrote:



I could live with a rule like that. Works well enough in the college game.

"djcubez" wrote:



DB's would abuse this. They would tackle a guy on any long ball to make a potential 30+ bomb into just a 10-15 yard penalty.

"wpr" wrote:



yep they would. just reload and run it again and again until they don't.
actually they would only do it if they got beat on the play.
So a team gets a new set of downs 10-15 yards down field that is not a crime. Sure beats seeing them get 30 when there is no way to know if the receiver would have even caught the ball. Even though it is the NFL and the player SHOULD catch the ball, there are an awful lot of dropped passes.
I hate it when the offense's big play is to throw down field and hope for the PI call from the ref.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I hate PI calls just as much as you but a rule like this would kill hail mary's and the long ball.

What if a receiver totally should have caught a ball but a guy got to him before he even had a chance? 10-15 yards for what could have been 40? That doesn't sound right. I also think the auto-first down would be going too far. What if the pass interference occurred on 3rd and 25 and the pass was only for 5 yards? That's a ridiculous rule. The problem with tweaking the PI rule is it only creates more problems.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
I guess I would rather give 10 or 15 yards and a 1st down that 30-40 yards for a penalty. If it really is a problem they can always change the rule back in a year two. It is not as if the NFL hasn't waffled before.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
14 years ago

I guess I would rather give 10 or 15 yards and a 1st down that 30-40 yards for a penalty. If it really is a problem they can always change the rule back in a year two. It is not as if the NFL hasn't waffled before.

"wpr" wrote:



If "solving" a problem creates even more problems was the action taken actually a solution? Sometimes yes, but not in this instance. The rule itself is fine, it's the enforcement of the rule that's the issue.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
Mucky Tundra (11h) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
Zero2Cool (11h) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
Mucky Tundra (11h) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Who's Theo?
Zero2Cool (12h) : How is Theo alliteration?
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
Zero2Cool (13h) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Oh, it's toe injury
Zero2Cool (15h) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
dfosterf (16h) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
dfosterf (16h) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
Zero2Cool (16h) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
Zero2Cool (16h) : He's on Browns, right?
dfosterf (16h) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
dfosterf (16h) : Fleece 'em again!
Zero2Cool (16h) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : No sir. I did not.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
wpr (23-Jul) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
wpr (23-Jul) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
Mucky Tundra (23-Jul) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
wpr (23-Jul) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
wpr (23-Jul) : The site is much more better.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
dfosterf (23-Jul) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Other times, it's turtle ass
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
beast (23-Jul) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
beast (23-Jul) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
beast (23-Jul) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
wpr (23-Jul) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : SSL might be settled now.
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
42m / Around The NFL / beast

10h / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.