Green Bay Packers QB Aaron Rodgers must find ways to win· Page 4

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

#31

I thought Majkowski wore #12?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Thinking of Dickey, maybe?

*Inset ZS comment on pretty deep ball here*

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#32

read a stat that said rodgers is 1-11 when behind in the 4th quarter. ppl on sports radio are starting to talk....just saying.

"dhpackr" wrote:

Just sayin, NO FUCKING SHIT, WE JUST READ THE PRECEDING COMMENT OF WHAT YOU'RE SAYING!

:pukeright: :physassult: :thumbright:

Sorry, it's a rule, I have to do that.

I had a comment but the whole reading of 'jus sayin' made me forget, lol.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#33

Well, dhazer once showed me a highlight video he said showed Majkowski in action, but the QB was clearly wearing #12, so it must have actually been Dickey.

dhpackr
Registered

14 years ago

#34

Well, dhazer once showed me a highlight video he said showed Majkowski in action, but the QB was clearly wearing #12, so it must have actually been Dickey.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Majik = #7

Dickey =#12
4 sho

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

#35

read a stat that said rodgers is 1-11 when behind in the 4th quarter. ppl on sports radio are starting to talk....just saying.

"dhpackr" wrote:

I don't think it was 1-11 when behind in fourth. It was 1-11 in close games. And that's even more worrying than just being behind at the start of the fourth.

This is a placeholder

Greg C.
Registered

14 years ago

#36

Well, dhazer once showed me a highlight video he said showed Majkowski in action, but the QB was clearly wearing #12, so it must have actually been Dickey.

"dhpackr" wrote:

Majik = #7

Dickey =#12
4 sho

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

As I recall, Dickey started out as #10, then switched to #12 later. But don't get me started with numbers....

blank

yooperfan
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#37

read a stat that said rodgers is 1-11 when behind in the 4th quarter. ppl on sports radio are starting to talk....just saying.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

I don't think it was 1-11 when behind in fourth. It was 1-11 in close games. And that's even more worrying than just being behind at the start of the fourth.

"dhpackr" wrote:

I believe the actual stat being thrown out there by the sports pundits this week is, Rodgers is 1 - 11 in games decided by 4 points or less.

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

#38

read a stat that said rodgers is 1-11 when behind in the 4th quarter. ppl on sports radio are starting to talk....just saying.

"yooperfan" wrote:

I don't think it was 1-11 when behind in fourth. It was 1-11 in close games. And that's even more worrying than just being behind at the start of the fourth.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

I believe the actual stat being thrown out there by the sports pundits this week is, Rodgers is 1 - 11 in games decided by 4 points or less.

"dhpackr" wrote:

4 points or less = close games. I didn't remember what the actual number for the spread was. Thanks.

This is a placeholder

Wade
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#39

Of course if the Packers didn't let the other team stay in the game, this wouldn't be such a big deal.

How many of those 11 losses are games that the other team should not have been within 4 points at any time in the fourth quarter?

Yeah, I'd rather have a quarterback who had a better record in close games. But what I'd like even more is a dominant team that didn't have so damn many close games.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

PackerTraxx
Senior Member

14 years ago

#40

read a stat that said rodgers is 1-11 when behind in the 4th quarter. ppl on sports radio are starting to talk....just saying.

"dhpackr" wrote:

It's all his fault the D couldn't hold the other team when he tied or put the Packer s ahead.

And it's his fault Neal is out for the year too.

Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (3h) : meh

Zero2Cool (7h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (7h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (7h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (11h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (11h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (13h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (14h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24