Pack93z
14 years ago
2 Safeties at this point for two reasons..

1. The DLine hits have a greater priority at this point.. we can utilize Bush at the safety spot.

2. Another point, after week 10 I believe we can resign Blackmon if he is healthy.. more potential depth. He knows the system, probably a quicker fix than a streeter.. it is how MM/Ted seem to work. Agree or not... seems their MO.

Now roll in possibly Bigby coming back.. I can understand it.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Seriously? Still 2 safeties?

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



Ya we do really need to sign one.
But for the time being Bush was moved to S

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



...

Seriously, that's even worse than no changes.

He was good at cornerback last week but I don't think we should switch him up to safety just as he started getting the hang of it.
This is a placeholder
Finley88Beast
14 years ago

Seriously? Still 2 safeties?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Ya we do really need to sign one.
But for the time being Bush was moved to S

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



...

Seriously, that's even worse than no changes.

He was good at cornerback last week but I don't think we should switch him up to safety just as he started getting the hang of it.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



better than no S's what if a guy gets hurt and we only got one S?

He is prob. a better S than CB.
A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Seriously? Still 2 safeties?

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



Ya we do really need to sign one.
But for the time being Bush was moved to S

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



...

Seriously, that's even worse than no changes.

He was good at cornerback last week but I don't think we should switch him up to safety just as he started getting the hang of it.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



better than no S's what if a guy gets hurt and we only got one S?

He is prob. a better S than CB.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



The first part of my post was a joke.

I really think moving people around too much will hurt them in the long run for both positions.
This is a placeholder
14 years ago

Seriously? Still 2 safeties?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Ya we do really need to sign one.
But for the time being Bush was moved to S

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



...

Seriously, that's even worse than no changes.

He was good at cornerback last week but I don't think we should switch him up to safety just as he started getting the hang of it.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



better than no S's what if a guy gets hurt and we only got one S?

He is prob. a better S than CB.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:



The first part of my post was a joke.

I really think moving people around too much will hurt them in the long run for both positions.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Agreed.

Daryn Colledge comes to mind.
UserPostedImage 
Zero2Cool is my captain.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
We'll use a LB in place of a S if it comes to that. I think it's the "Big Okie" or something.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago

Bush - the Rodney Dangerfield of the GBP. I would tender a guess that his versatility is why he is on this team.

"DakotaT" wrote:



2 depth spots/1 roster spot. Not the greatest at either but not many teams if any have a better CB or S at the bottom of the depth.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Yerko
14 years ago
I can cope with losing Barnett. the past couple of years I have zoned in on watching him and even though some think we give up a little pass coverage with Bishop taking over, there were many times Barnett blew coverage in the past couple years (Shiancoe comes to mind last year in the endzone- Barnett had man coverage).

Nick Barnett made a lot of small plays here and there. He talks more than he walks. I'm not saying he is a terrible player but I think we are lucky to have a guy like Bishop waiting to fill the position.

I am going to go out on a limb and say a lot of people might prefer Bishop over Barnett come the end of this season.

(Please prove me right Bishop)
UserPostedImage
doddpower
14 years ago
ugh, I've never been a fan of Montgomery. I have a hard time believing he's the best option available at any of our positions of need. Sure, he might have a jump on the system but the little impact he will make anytime soon anyway nullifies that.

Sure hope he proves me wrong.
zombieslayer
14 years ago

Bush - the Rodney Dangerfield of the GBP. I would tender a guess that his versatility is why he is on this team.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Exactly. For all the Bush hate on this board, there's something to be said for a guy who can play a lot of positions. This is the NFL. People get injured.

Back to Nick, bad blow. Remember that top 10 thread of players we don't want to lose to injury someone started earlier in the year? I think I had Nick B at something like 7 or 8. He was in my top 10.

He's a solid LB and it's not like solid LBs grow on trees.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (40m) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (16h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
16h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

18h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.