No Run Game?· Page 4 · PACKERSHOME

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

If anyone feels better we have a better running game than DA dumb ass Bears,Bears are 31th and were 22nd.Honestly were not that bad compared to other teams.Yes we do need it to be better but hell I worrie about other things on are team than are running game which could by all means get better.And it actually looked better yesterday I think it is getting better,Quick note I liked that arod checked out a lot of plays yesterday to turn them into runs they should do it more.Hell even the running game won the game at the end.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

Agreed. I'm not panicking. Jackson corrected his mistakes from earlier and Kuhn looked awesome on that last drive.

We may finish this year around average or slightly under average in rushing yards. I'm fine with that, as long as Aaron can throw 30+ TDs.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Finley88Beast
Registered

14 years ago

#32

"wpr" wrote:

It is not entirely fair to do this but if you take out Rodgers running plays (15 times for 69 yards) most of them scrambles when things broke down, GB has 309 yards on 81 carries. That would make them the 26th best team running the ball. This shows they do have a few problems.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

I agree with you are running game has some problems,but having your QB run for yards by all means count in my book,even if it is a broken play it still is making a play and keeps the drive going.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#33

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

"wpr" wrote:

I agree with you are running game has some problems,but having your QB run for yards by all means count in my book,even if it is a broken play it still is making a play and keeps the drive going.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

Of course they do. But just how many times during the course of the season does Mike & Co sit down and draw up a running play with the line, "Drop back to pass Aaron and when the DL line comes storming in and all the receivers are covered we expect you to run for 15 yards"?
Those yards are a bonus. They are coming at the expense of the passing game. Every team gets a few of those. GB gets more than other teams because of Aaron's mobility. They expect Aaron to do that a couple of times a game. But when they game plan and say they are going to run the ball 15 times and want 85 yards none of them are the yards that Aaron gets.

Finley88Beast
Registered

14 years ago

#34

"wpr" wrote:

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

I agree with you are running game has some problems,but having your QB run for yards by all means count in my book,even if it is a broken play it still is making a play and keeps the drive going.

"wpr" wrote:

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

Well all Im saying with all things you said aside which I agree with,Im more concerned with other areas on are team then are running game.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#35

Well all Im saying with all things you said aside which I agree with,Im more concerned with other areas on are team then are running game.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

Personally, I'm a lot more worried about our STs than I am our running game.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

#36

Well all Im saying with all things you said aside which I agree with,Im more concerned with other areas on are team then are running game.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Personally, I'm a lot more worried about our STs than I am our running game.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

Why do I cringe every time I see you have posted in a thread about the running game?

This is a placeholder

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#37

Why do I cringe every time I see you have posted in a thread about the running game?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

Because unlike a lot of people, I'm willing to back my thesis statement with facts. Want more facts as why we shouldn't panic about our running game?

EDIT: Screw it. Whether you like it or not, I'll give you more facts.

Last year, there were 32 teams. Of those 32 teams, the teams with the #28, #31, and #32 rushing attacks made the Playoffs. So that means 3 of the 5 WORST teams in the NFL at running the ball made the Playoffs.

So should we be panicking? No.

Oh, another little fact. The Saints won the SB and only got 51 yards total rushing.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

#38

Why do I cringe every time I see you have posted in a thread about the running game?

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Because unlike a lot of people, I'm willing to back my thesis statement with facts. Want more facts as why we shouldn't panic about our running game?

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

I was just screwing with you, don't trip.

I think our main goal is to fix the special teams and make Rodgers more accurate when we are ahead.

This is a placeholder

LambeauEast
Rookie

14 years ago

#39

I have been wondering if it is time to call Kuhn the #1 RB. Let him pound away at the line 15-18 times a game. I realize he doesn't have breakaway speed but if he consistently picks up 3-4 yards and wears down the DL that is something.

Move Jackson back to the 3rd down back and let hi do what he does best.

Leave room for Starks. If he shows he can do something work him in. If not either put him on IR or inactivate him for the games.

"wpr" wrote:

I agree 100%.

wpr
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#40

Well all Im saying with all things you said aside which I agree with,Im more concerned with other areas on are team then are running game.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Personally, I'm a lot more worried about our STs than I am our running game.

"Finley88Beast" wrote:

me too. that's why my fixes were simple ones.
fix it and forget it. move on to something else.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (16h) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22